[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] xen/riscv: implement vcpu_csr_init()


  • To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 15:23:07 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Romain Caritey <Romain.Caritey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 14:23:18 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 13.02.2026 17:28, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/domain.c
> @@ -6,10 +6,74 @@
>  #include <xen/sched.h>
>  #include <xen/vmap.h>
>  
> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <asm/csr.h>
> +#include <asm/riscv_encoding.h>
>  #include <asm/setup.h>
>  
>  struct csr_masks __ro_after_init csr_masks;
>  
> +#define HEDELEG_DEFAULT (BIT(CAUSE_MISALIGNED_FETCH, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_FETCH_ACCESS, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_ILLEGAL_INSTRUCTION, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_BREAKPOINT, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_MISALIGNED_LOAD, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_LOAD_ACCESS, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_MISALIGNED_STORE, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_STORE_ACCESS, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_USER_ECALL, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_FETCH_PAGE_FAULT, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT, U) | \
> +                         BIT(CAUSE_STORE_PAGE_FAULT, U))
> +
> +#define HIDELEG_DEFAULT (MIP_VSSIP | MIP_VSTIP | MIP_VSEIP)
> +
> +static void vcpu_csr_init(struct vcpu *v)
> +{
> +    v->arch.hedeleg = HEDELEG_DEFAULT & csr_masks.hedeleg;
> +
> +    vcpu_guest_cpu_user_regs(v)->hstatus = HSTATUS_SPV | HSTATUS_SPVP;
> +
> +    v->arch.hideleg = HIDELEG_DEFAULT & csr_masks.hideleg;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * VS should access only the time counter directly.
> +     * Everything else should trap.
> +     */
> +    v->arch.hcounteren = HCOUNTEREN_TM;
> +
> +    if ( riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, RISCV_ISA_EXT_svpbmt) )
> +        v->arch.henvcfg = ENVCFG_PBMTE & csr_masks.henvcfg;
> +
> +    if ( riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, RISCV_ISA_EXT_smstateen) )
> +    {
> +        register_t hstateen0 = 0;
> +
> +        if ( riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ssaia) )
> +            /*
> +             * If the hypervisor extension is implemented, the same three
> +             * bits are defined also in hypervisor CSR hstateen0 but concern
> +             * only the state potentially accessible to a virtual machine
> +             * executing in privilege modes VS and VU:
> +             *      bit 60 CSRs siselect and sireg (really vsiselect and
> +             *             vsireg)
> +             *      bit 59 CSRs siph and sieh (RV32 only) and stopi (really
> +             *             vsiph, vsieh, and vstopi)
> +             *      bit 58 all state of IMSIC guest interrupt files, 
> including
> +             *             CSR stopei (really vstopei)
> +             * If one of these bits is zero in hstateen0, and the same bit is
> +             * one in mstateen0, then an attempt to access the corresponding
> +             * state from VS or VU-mode raises a virtual instruction 
> exception.
> +             */
> +            hstateen0 = SMSTATEEN0_AIA | SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC | 
> SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT;
> +
> +        /* Allow guest to access CSR_ENVCFG */
> +        hstateen0 |= SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;

I continue to be puzzled by the use of = vs |=. If you use |=, best do so
uniformly. Then inserting new code ahead of the one you have now is not a
problem. I wonder anyway why you don't do (omitting commentary):

        register_t hstateen0 = SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;

        if ( riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ssaia) )
            hstateen0 |= SMSTATEEN0_AIA | SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC | SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT;

As to CSR_ENVCFG - what's that referring to? I'm aware of menvcfg, henvcfg,
and senvcfg. But I'm unaware of plain envcfg, and there's also no CSR_ENVCFG
constant in riscv_encoding.h afaics. I assume it's senvcfg that you mean
here. And then - is this CSR unconditionally available? The "Supervisor ISA"
isn't called an extension, yet at the same time it's also part of the
separate "privileged" specification, not the general one.

> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/domain.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ struct arch_vcpu {
>      } xen_saved_context;
>  
>      struct cpu_info *cpu_info;
> +
> +    register_t hcounteren;
> +    register_t hedeleg;
> +    register_t henvcfg;
> +    register_t hideleg;
> +    register_t hstateen0;
>  };

One question about the ordering here: It looks to be alphabetically sorted
right now, yet I wonder whether that's optimal. Some CSRs might typically
be used together, in which case they may best live close together (for
chances to be good that they end up in the same cache line).

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.