[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] x86/cpufreq: Add Kconfig option for CPU frequency scaling


  • To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:05:51 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx>, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx, alejandro.garciavallejo@xxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:06:02 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 10.02.2026 03:04, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2026, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 07.02.2026 00:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:> --- a/xen/common/Kconfig
>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/sched.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/sched.h
>>> @@ -1255,9 +1255,14 @@ static always_inline bool is_iommu_enabled(const 
>>> struct domain *d)
>>>  extern bool sched_smt_power_savings;
>>>  extern bool sched_disable_smt_switching;
>>>  
>>> -extern enum cpufreq_controller {
>>> +enum cpufreq_controller {
>>>      FREQCTL_none, FREQCTL_dom0_kernel, FREQCTL_xen
>>> -} cpufreq_controller;
>>
>> This enum would better ...
>>
>>> +};
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPUFREQ
>>> +extern enum cpufreq_controller cpufreq_controller;
>>
>> ... stay inside here, then also making the split of type and var decl 
>> unnecessary.
>>
>> The two affected platform-ops likely want compiling out, too.
>  
> I am not sure I understood your suggestion. If this is what you are
> thinking about, it doesn't seem like an improvement.
> 
> --- a/xen/include/xen/sched.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/sched.h
> @@ -1255,13 +1255,15 @@ static always_inline bool is_iommu_enabled(const 
> struct domain *d)
>  extern bool sched_smt_power_savings;
>  extern bool sched_disable_smt_switching;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPUFREQ
>  enum cpufreq_controller {
>      FREQCTL_none, FREQCTL_dom0_kernel, FREQCTL_xen
>  };
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPUFREQ
>  extern enum cpufreq_controller cpufreq_controller;
>  #else
> -#define cpufreq_controller FREQCTL_none
> +#define FREQCTL_none        0
> +#define FREQCTL_dom0_kernel 1
> +#define cpufreq_controller  FREQCTL_none
>  #endif

No. FREQCTL_* shouldn't need to be visible at all when CPUFREQ=n. Hence
the reference to the two platform-ops, where one (and cpufreq_controller)
is used. If those uses are also suitably compiled out, the #define-s
above shouldn't be necessary. That said, use of IS_ENABLED() there would
of course require the arrangement to stay as you had it originally.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.