[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/mm: limit non-scrubbed allocations to a specific order


  • To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:13:25 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:13:52 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 15.01.2026 12:18, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> The current logic allows for up to 1G pages to be scrubbed in place, which
> can cause the watchdog to trigger in practice.  Reduce the limit for
> in-place scrubbed allocations to a newly introduced define:
> CONFIG_DIRTY_MAX_ORDER.  This currently defaults to CONFIG_DOMU_MAX_ORDER
> on all architectures.  Also introduce a command line option to set the
> value.
> 
> Fixes: 74d2e11ccfd2 ("mm: Scrub pages in alloc_heap_pages() if needed")
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>  - Split from previous patch.
>  - Introduce a command line option to set the limit.
> ---
>  docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc |  9 +++++++++
>  xen/common/page_alloc.c           | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

If you confine the change to page_alloc.c, won't this mean that patch 2's
passing of MEMF_no_scrub will then also be bounded (in which case the need
for patch 2 would largely disappear)?

> --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
> +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
> @@ -1822,6 +1822,15 @@ Specify the deepest C-state CPUs are permitted to be 
> placed in, and
>  optionally the maximum sub C-state to be used used.  The latter only applies
>  to the highest permitted C-state.
>  
> +### max-order-dirty
> +> `= <integer>`
> +
> +Specify the maximum allocation order allowed when scrubbing allocated pages
> +in-place.  The allocation is non-preemptive, and hence the value must be keep
> +low enough to avoid hogging the CPU for too long.
> +
> +Defaults to `CONFIG_DIRTY_MAX_ORDER` or if unset to `CONFIG_DOMU_MAX_ORDER`.

This may end up misleading, as - despite their names - these aren't really
Kconfig settings that people could easily control in their builds.

>  ### max_gsi_irqs (x86)
>  > `= <integer>`

I also wonder whether your addition wouldn't more naturally go a litter
further down, by assuming / implying that the sorting used largely ignores
separator characters (underscore vs dash here).

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.