|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Ping: [PATCH] flask: fix gcov build with gcc14+
Daniel, On 08.01.2026 10:18, Jan Beulich wrote: > Gcc's "threading" of conditionals can lead to undue warnings, as reported > in e.g. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116519 (no matter > that the overall situation is different there). While my gcc15 complains > ("buf[2] may be used uninitialized in this function") about only two of > the three instances (not about the one in type_read()), adjust all three > to be on the safe side. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> any chance of an ack (or otherwise)? Thanks, Jan > --- > While auditing uses of next_entry(), I noticed POLICYDB_VERSION_ROLETRANS > dependent ones in policydb_read(): How come the 4th slot isn't used at all > there (not even checked for being e.g. zero, i.e. holding no useful data)? > Then again other instances can be found where data is read but outright > ignored. > > --- a/xen/xsm/flask/ss/policydb.c > +++ b/xen/xsm/flask/ss/policydb.c > @@ -1271,7 +1271,10 @@ static int cf_check role_read(struct pol > if ( ver >= POLICYDB_VERSION_BOUNDARY ) > rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(buf[0]) * 3); > else > + { > rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(buf[0]) * 2); > + buf[2] = cpu_to_le32(0); /* gcc14 onwards */ > + } > > if ( rc < 0 ) > goto bad; > @@ -1342,7 +1345,10 @@ static int cf_check type_read(struct pol > if ( ver >= POLICYDB_VERSION_BOUNDARY ) > rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(buf[0]) * 4); > else > + { > rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(buf[0]) * 3); > + buf[3] = cpu_to_le32(0); /* gcc14 onwards */ > + } > > if ( rc < 0 ) > goto bad; > @@ -1436,7 +1442,10 @@ static int cf_check user_read(struct pol > if ( ver >= POLICYDB_VERSION_BOUNDARY ) > rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(buf[0]) * 3); > else > + { > rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(buf[0]) * 2); > + buf[2] = cpu_to_le32(0); /* gcc14 onwards */ > + } > > if ( rc < 0 ) > goto bad;
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |