Re: [PATCH v6 14/14] mm: Add basic tests for lazy_mmu

[Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>]

On 17/12/2025 09:26, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> On 17/12/2025 05:14, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:03:23 +0000 Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Add basic KUnit tests for the generic aspects of the lazy MMU mode:
>>> ensure that it appears active when it should, depending on how
>>> enable/disable and pause/resume pairs are nested.
>> I needed this for powerpc allmodconfig;
>>
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c~mm-add-basic-tests-for-lazy_mmu-fix
>> +++ a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>>  #include <trace/events/thp.h>
>>  
>>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ppc64_tlb_batch, ppc64_tlb_batch);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ppc64_tlb_batch);
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * A linux PTE was changed and the corresponding hash table entry
>> @@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ void __flush_tlb_pending(struct ppc64_tl
>>              flush_hash_range(i, local);
>>      batch->index = 0;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__flush_tlb_pending);
>>  
>>  void hash__tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
>>  {
>> _
> 
> Oh indeed I hadn't considered that arch_{enter,leave}_lazy_mmu_mode()
> refer to those symbols on powerpc... Maybe a bit overkill to export
> those just for a test module, but I'm not sure there's a good
> alternative. Forcing LAZY_MMU_MODE_KUNIT_TEST=y is ugly as it would also
> force KUNIT=y. Alternatively we could depend on !PPC, not pretty either.

Does EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT() help?

> 
> - Kevin