|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Strange symbols_lookup() behaviour in test-symbols on arm64 CI
On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 6:23 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11.12.2025 17:05, Mykola Kvach wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 5:59 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 11.12.2025 16:57, Mykola Kvach wrote: > >>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 5:31 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On 11.12.2025 13:06, Mykola Kvach wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 1:44 PM Mykola Kvach <xakep.amatop@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> I tested the issue with the provided patch, and it is still > >>>>>> reproducible. > >>>>> > >>>>> I also triggered a pipeline with the patch you provided on top of my > >>>>> changes [1], > >>>>> and it failed there as well. In fact, it exposed additional problems > >>>>> in other jobs. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] > >>>>> https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/mykola_kvach/xen/-/pipelines/2209153728 > >>>> > >>>> These are the failures we're trying to hunt down. > >>>> > >>>> Looking at one of the Arm build logs, I can't see any indication that > >>>> you actually > >>>> extended the patch to Arm's linking rule. Hence my conclusion in the > >>>> other reply > >>>> may be wrong - we simply still don't know what the situation is there. > >>> > >>> You're right, I missed the necessary changes. Would this diff be > >>> sufficient? > >> > >> Yes, this looks to be what is needed. > > > > Unfortunately, with this diff applied the issue is still reproducible > > on my side. > > Please see the attached logs for details. > > IOW the build succeeded with the check added? You didn't provide the build > log, > so I feel I should double check. I have now attached the corresponding build log. > > Jan Attachment:
build.log Attachment:
boot.log
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |