[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/vPMU: move APIC ack past the handling of the interrupt
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 12:31:22 +0000
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=sqC64A7fk6ujRRKnLMrKM4vYk+jM2ISqPkVTxP1X/6s=; b=TyY0nxXdKeRMnfCzxXIssoz48kFzPgaBpMMftDCtaqXiWdFzeSckG6qU0q5FQqwabSW5MSbzN23vtDN8tEy4Ginf5eQ0wCleYOldvU4izSILe5XtJYf9trHvBwK3B23pEXTUnO9bWD7W52ED3gkZNZZEHwE/vWTfAeMl4WKhP0lq4KtNXvfdg4uiZoXTv1rMWqyBAjjWb7Kzjo9+TA94YgVA/aOE5WUPa2LEtQk/VuIbxbKcFyHcqpVz2EMhqHcu5c0hxTsQgMclXolJkpSOE17Mm2uXhDaC46fTEEapPrKZ2H9PDu1y0tx4a2SmZNjRPhmD3TkhaIm08WKO04QSHQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Ct1c35hKZhynlSWaK2e+7wRcwho3W3a2JLGN7Kd2W5AC2waIEgJewKuQM1BS4Qv//iH0ycLX0zXSz0FeS225StUdmjzk7RCAWTnjBNk2wlTLWhNJH41d4s3AlOl8m5XgFy32nTlwjWQprnlPJxC9RgFcBoQYJ4GY8xbfWr8+/wWm1/3gZh4FR6vxV3sI2jjSn9RUjTItWGjn8G5oSSGSS8DD0Clip758d/Hz+WYX5Chm4+e3vi7dC9d9ZHnopoNPInVhqeShLgBLYHLOOaoY5ivVtrHNVc8nGefEgTkG99vjBkLcdYMzU6bkHMELqjS3AhLE8umPo/evDADCQVSHww==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 12:44:02 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 24/11/2025 12:29 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While benign as long as it's using a direct-APIC-vector (handlers for
> which are called with IRQs off), follow the more usual pattern of ack-ing
> the IRQ only after handling it.
>
> Requested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
