|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] xen/arm: gic-v3: Implement GICv3 suspend/resume functions
Hi,
Mykola Kvach <xakep.amatop@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Mykola Kvach <mykola_kvach@xxxxxxxx>
>
> System suspend may lead to a state where GIC would be powered down.
> Therefore, Xen should save/restore the context of GIC on suspend/resume.
>
> Note that the context consists of states of registers which are
> controlled by the hypervisor. Other GIC registers which are accessible
> by guests are saved/restored on context switch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mykola Kvach <mykola_kvach@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c | 233 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 233 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
> index cd3e1acf79..a9b65ff5d4 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
> @@ -1776,6 +1776,231 @@ static bool gic_dist_supports_lpis(void)
> return (readl_relaxed(GICD + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPE_LPIS);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_SUSPEND
> +
> +/* GICv3 registers to be saved/restored on system suspend/resume */
> +struct gicv3_ctx {
> + struct dist_ctx {
> + uint32_t ctlr;
> + /*
> + * This struct represent block of 32 IRQs
> + * TODO: store extended SPI configuration (GICv3.1+)
> + */
> + struct irq_regs {
> + uint32_t icfgr[2];
> + uint32_t ipriorityr[8];
> + uint64_t irouter[32];
> + uint32_t isactiver;
> + uint32_t isenabler;
> + } *irqs;
> + } dist;
> +
> + /* have only one rdist structure for last running CPU during suspend */
> + struct redist_ctx {
> + uint32_t ctlr;
> + /* TODO: handle case when we have more than 16 PPIs (GICv3.1+) */
> + uint32_t icfgr[2];
> + uint32_t igroupr;
> + uint32_t ipriorityr[8];
> + uint32_t isactiver;
> + uint32_t isenabler;
> + } rdist;
> +
> + struct cpu_ctx {
> + uint32_t ctlr;
> + uint32_t pmr;
> + uint32_t bpr;
> + uint32_t sre_el2;
> + uint32_t grpen;
> + } cpu;
> +};
> +
> +static struct gicv3_ctx gicv3_ctx;
> +
> +static void __init gicv3_alloc_context(void)
> +{
> + uint32_t blocks = DIV_ROUND_UP(gicv3_info.nr_lines, 32);
> +
> + if ( gicv3_its_host_has_its() )
> + return;
I think this needs a comment at least. And/or printk() message. Because
for it is unclear why we are doing nothing if host has ITS
> +
> + /* according to spec it is possible don't have SPIs */
> + if ( blocks == 1 )
> + return;
> +
> + gicv3_ctx.dist.irqs = xzalloc_array(typeof(*gicv3_ctx.dist.irqs), blocks
> - 1);
> + if ( !gicv3_ctx.dist.irqs )
> + dprintk(XENLOG_ERR,
> + "%s:%d: failed to allocate memory for GICv3 suspend
> context\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
dprintk() already prints function and line. Here and everywhere in this
patch.
> +}
> +
> +static void gicv3_disable_redist(void)
> +{
> + void __iomem* waker = GICD_RDIST_BASE + GICR_WAKER;
> +
> + writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(waker) | GICR_WAKER_ProcessorSleep, waker);
> + while ( (readl_relaxed(waker) & GICR_WAKER_ChildrenAsleep) == 0 );
> +}
> +
> +static int gicv3_suspend(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + typeof(gicv3_ctx.rdist)* rdist = &gicv3_ctx.rdist;
> +
> + /* TODO: implement support for ITS */
> + if ( gicv3_its_host_has_its() )
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if ( !gicv3_ctx.dist.irqs && gicv3_info.nr_lines > NR_GIC_LOCAL_IRQS )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,
> + "%s:%d: GICv3 suspend context is not allocated!\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + gicv3_save_state(current);
> +
> + /* Save GICC configuration */
> + gicv3_ctx.cpu.ctlr = READ_SYSREG(ICC_CTLR_EL1);
> + gicv3_ctx.cpu.pmr = READ_SYSREG(ICC_PMR_EL1);
> + gicv3_ctx.cpu.bpr = READ_SYSREG(ICC_BPR1_EL1);
> + gicv3_ctx.cpu.sre_el2 = READ_SYSREG(ICC_SRE_EL2);
> + gicv3_ctx.cpu.grpen = READ_SYSREG(ICC_IGRPEN1_EL1);
> +
> + gicv3_disable_interface();
> + gicv3_disable_redist();
> +
> + /* Save GICR configuration */
> + gicv3_redist_wait_for_rwp();
> +
> + base = GICD_RDIST_SGI_BASE;
> +
> + rdist->ctlr = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_CTLR);
> +
> + /* Set priority on PPI and SGI interrupts */
Probably you wanted to say "Save priority..."
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_GIC_LOCAL_IRQS / 4; i += 4)
> + rdist->ipriorityr[i] = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_IPRIORITYR0 + 4 *
> i);
Is this correct? You are writing to every 4th rdist->ipriorityr and
reading every 4th GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>
> +
> + rdist->isactiver = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_ISACTIVER0);
> + rdist->isenabler = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_ISENABLER0);
> + rdist->igroupr = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_IGROUPR0);
> + rdist->icfgr[0] = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_ICFGR0);
> + rdist->icfgr[1] = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_ICFGR1);
> +
> + /* Save GICD configuration */
> + gicv3_dist_wait_for_rwp();
> + gicv3_ctx.dist.ctlr = readl_relaxed(GICD + GICD_CTLR);
> +
> + for ( i = 1; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(gicv3_info.nr_lines, 32); i++ )
> + {
> + typeof(gicv3_ctx.dist.irqs) irqs = gicv3_ctx.dist.irqs + i - 1;
> + unsigned int irq;
> +
> + base = GICD + GICD_ICFGR + 8 * i;
> + irqs->icfgr[0] = readl_relaxed(base);
> + irqs->icfgr[1] = readl_relaxed(base + 4);
> +
> + base = GICD + GICD_IPRIORITYR + 32 * i;
> + for ( irq = 0; irq < 8; irq++ )
> + irqs->ipriorityr[irq] = readl_relaxed(base + 4 * irq);
> +
> + base = GICD + GICD_IROUTER + 32 * i;
> + for ( irq = 0; irq < 32; irq++ )
> + irqs->irouter[irq] = readq_relaxed_non_atomic(base + 8 * irq);
> +
> + irqs->isactiver = readl_relaxed(GICD + GICD_ISACTIVER + 4 * i);
> + irqs->isenabler = readl_relaxed(GICD + GICD_ISENABLER + 4 * i);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void gicv3_resume(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + typeof(gicv3_ctx.rdist)* rdist = &gicv3_ctx.rdist;
> +
> + if ( !gicv3_ctx.dist.irqs && gicv3_info.nr_lines > NR_GIC_LOCAL_IRQS )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "%s:%d: GICv3 suspend context not
> allocated!\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writel_relaxed(0, GICD + GICD_CTLR);
> +
> + for ( i = NR_GIC_LOCAL_IRQS; i < gicv3_info.nr_lines; i += 32 )
> + writel_relaxed(GENMASK(31, 0), GICD + GICD_IGROUPR + (i / 32) * 4);
> +
> + for ( i = 1; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(gicv3_info.nr_lines, 32); i++ )
> + {
> + typeof(gicv3_ctx.dist.irqs) irqs = gicv3_ctx.dist.irqs + i - 1;
> + unsigned int irq;
> +
> + base = GICD + GICD_ICFGR + 8 * i;
> + writel_relaxed(irqs->icfgr[0], base);
> + writel_relaxed(irqs->icfgr[1], base + 4);
> +
> + base = GICD + GICD_IPRIORITYR + 32 * i;
> + for ( irq = 0; irq < 8; irq++ )
> + writel_relaxed(irqs->ipriorityr[irq], base + 4 * irq );
style: space before )
> +
> + base = GICD + GICD_IROUTER + 32 * i;
> + for ( irq = 0; irq < 32; irq++ )
> + writeq_relaxed_non_atomic(irqs->irouter[irq], base + 8 * irq);
> +
> + writel_relaxed(irqs->isenabler, GICD + GICD_ISENABLER + i * 4);
> + writel_relaxed(irqs->isactiver, GICD + GICD_ISACTIVER + i * 4);
> + }
> +
> + writel_relaxed(gicv3_ctx.dist.ctlr, GICD + GICD_CTLR);
> + gicv3_dist_wait_for_rwp();
> +
> + /* Restore GICR (Redistributor) configuration */
> + gicv3_enable_redist();
> +
> + base = GICD_RDIST_SGI_BASE;
> +
> + writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GICR_ICENABLER0);
> + gicv3_redist_wait_for_rwp();
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_GIC_LOCAL_IRQS / 4; i += 4)
> + writel_relaxed(rdist->ipriorityr[i], base + GICR_IPRIORITYR0 + i *
> 4);
Is this correct? You are writing to every 4th GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>
> +
> + writel_relaxed(rdist->isactiver, base + GICR_ISACTIVER0);
> +
> + writel_relaxed(rdist->igroupr, base + GICR_IGROUPR0);
> + writel_relaxed(rdist->icfgr[0], base + GICR_ICFGR0);
> + writel_relaxed(rdist->icfgr[1], base + GICR_ICFGR1);
> +
> + gicv3_redist_wait_for_rwp();
> +
> + writel_relaxed(rdist->isenabler, base + GICR_ISENABLER0);
> + writel_relaxed(rdist->ctlr, GICD_RDIST_BASE + GICR_CTLR);
> +
> + gicv3_redist_wait_for_rwp();
> +
> + WRITE_SYSREG(gicv3_ctx.cpu.sre_el2, ICC_SRE_EL2);
> + isb();
> +
> + /* Restore CPU interface (System registers) */
> + WRITE_SYSREG(gicv3_ctx.cpu.pmr, ICC_PMR_EL1);
> + WRITE_SYSREG(gicv3_ctx.cpu.bpr, ICC_BPR1_EL1);
> + WRITE_SYSREG(gicv3_ctx.cpu.ctlr, ICC_CTLR_EL1);
> + WRITE_SYSREG(gicv3_ctx.cpu.grpen, ICC_IGRPEN1_EL1);
> + isb();
> +
> + gicv3_hyp_init();
> +
> + gicv3_restore_state(current);
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SYSTEM_SUSPEND */
> +
> /* Set up the GIC */
> static int __init gicv3_init(void)
> {
> @@ -1850,6 +2075,10 @@ static int __init gicv3_init(void)
>
> gicv3_hyp_init();
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_SUSPEND
> + gicv3_alloc_context();
> +#endif
> +
> out:
> spin_unlock(&gicv3.lock);
>
> @@ -1889,6 +2118,10 @@ static const struct gic_hw_operations gicv3_ops = {
> #endif
> .iomem_deny_access = gicv3_iomem_deny_access,
> .do_LPI = gicv3_do_LPI,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_SUSPEND
> + .suspend = gicv3_suspend,
> + .resume = gicv3_resume,
> +#endif
> };
>
> static int __init gicv3_dt_preinit(struct dt_device_node *node, const void
> *data)
--
WBR, Volodymyr
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |