[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] x86/mm: adjust loop in arch_init_memory() to iterate over the PDX space
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 04:33:53PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.07.2025 13:04, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > There's a loop in arch_init_memory() that iterates over holes and non-RAM > > regions to possibly mark any page_info structures matching those addresses > > as IO. The looping there is done over the PFN space. > > > > PFNs not covered by the PDX space will always fail the mfn_valid() check, > > hence re-write the loop to iterate over the PDX space and avoid checking > > any holes that are not covered by the PDX translation. > > > > On a system with a ~6TiB hole this change together with using PDX > > compression reduces boot time in approximately 20 seconds. Xen boot time > > without the change is ~50s, with the change it's ~30s. > > That's nice, and I agree what we currently do isn't very efficient, but ... > > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > > @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static void __init assign_io_page(struct page_info > > *page) > > > > void __init arch_init_memory(void) > > { > > - unsigned long i, pfn, rstart_pfn, rend_pfn, iostart_pfn, ioend_pfn; > > + unsigned long i, pfn, rstart_pfn, rend_pfn, iostart_pfn, ioend_pfn, > > pdx; > > > > /* > > * Basic guest-accessible flags: > > @@ -328,9 +328,14 @@ void __init arch_init_memory(void) > > destroy_xen_mappings((unsigned long)mfn_to_virt(iostart_pfn), > > (unsigned long)mfn_to_virt(ioend_pfn)); > > > > - /* Mark as I/O up to next RAM region. */ > > - for ( ; pfn < rstart_pfn; pfn++ ) > > + /* > > + * Mark as I/O up to next RAM region. Iterate over the PDX space > > to > > + * skip holes which would always fail the mfn_valid() check. > > + */ > > + for ( pdx = pfn_to_pdx(pfn); pdx < pfn_to_pdx(rstart_pfn); pdx++ ) > > ... pfn_to_pdx() isn't well-defined for a non-RAM PFN, or more precisely for > any > PFN that fails the mfn_valid() check. That is, I think, particularly > noticeable > with the new offset compression you introduce. rstart_pfn will always point to the start of the next RAM region (or the end of the current region if it's the last one). So for that case pfn_to_pdx() is always provided a RAM PFN as input parameter. However for the pfn parameter, we would need to do pfn_to_pdx(pfn - 1), as that's the last address in the previous RAM range. The loop would then possibly be: for ( pdx = pfn_to_pdx((pfn ?: 1) - 1) + 1; pdx < pfn_to_pdx(rstart_pfn); pdx++ ) { ... This also assumes that PFN 0 will always have a valid PDX translation, regardless of whether it's RAM or not (which is the case given the PDX code currently used). Thanks, Roger.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |