[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] xen/domain: adjust domain ID allocation for Arm
Hi Denis, On 05/06/2025 23:05, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Denis, On 28/05/2025 23:50, dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx wrote:From: Denis Mukhin <dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx> From: Denis Mukhin <dmukhin@xxxxxxxx>Remove the hardcoded domain ID 0 allocation for hardware domain and replace it with a call to get_initial_domain_id() (returns the value of hardware_domid onArm).I am not entirely why this is done. Are you intending to pass a different domain ID? If so...Update domid_alloc(DOMID_INVALID) case to ensure that get_initial_domain_id()ID is skipped during domain ID allocation to cover domU case in dom0lessconfiguration. That also fixes a potential issue with re-using ID#0 for domUswhen get_initial_domain_id() returns non-zero. Signed-off-by: Denis Mukhin <dmukhin@xxxxxxxx> --- Changes since v8: - rebased --- xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 4 ++-- xen/common/device-tree/dom0less-build.c | 9 +++------ xen/common/domain.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c index e9d563c269..0ad80b020a 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c @@ -2035,9 +2035,9 @@ void __init create_dom0(void)... naming like create_dom0() probably wants to be renamed.That said, I am not convinced a domain other than 0 should have full privilege by default. So I would argue it should stay as ...if ( !llc_coloring_enabled ) flags |= CDF_directmap; - domid = domid_alloc(0); + domid = domid_alloc(get_initial_domain_id());... 0. Looking at the implementation of get_initial_domain_id(), I noticed the behavior was changed for x86 by [1]. Before, get_initial_domain_id() was returning 0 except for the PV shim.But now, it would could return the domain ID specified on the command line (via hardware_dom). From my understanding, the goal of the command line was to create the hardware domain *after* boot. So initially we create dom0 and then initialize the hardware domain. With the patch below, this has changed. However, from the commit message, I don't understand why. It seems like we broke late hwdom? For instance, late_hwdom_init() has the following assert: dom0 = rcu_lock_domain_by_id(0); ASSERT(dom0 != NULL);Jan, I saw you were involved in the review of the series. Any idea why this was changed? Cheers, [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250306075819.154361-1-dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx/ -- Julien Grall
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |