[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] xen/console: remove max_init_domid dependency


  • To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 08:11:51 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx, julien@xxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, dmukhin@xxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 06:12:25 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 03.06.2025 02:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2025, dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/domain.c
>> @@ -2461,6 +2461,39 @@ void domid_free(domid_t domid)
>>      spin_unlock(&domid_lock);
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Find the ID of the next possible console owner domain.
>> + *
>> + * @return Domain ID: DOMID_XEN or non-system domain IDs within
>> + * the range of [0..DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED-1].
>> + */
>> +domid_t domid_find_with_input_allowed(domid_t hint)
>> +{
>> +    domid_t domid = DOMID_XEN;
>> +
>> +    if ( hint < DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED )
>> +    {
>> +        struct domain *d;
>> +
>> +        rcu_read_lock(&domlist_read_lock);
>> +
>> +        for ( d = domid_to_domain(hint);
>> +              d && get_domain(d) && d->domain_id < DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED;
> 
> The get_domain(d) worries me because it is increasing the domain's
> refcnt but I don't see a corresponding call to put_domain to decrease
> it.
> 
> If I keep rotating between consoles, I could keep increasing refcnt
> indefinitely?
> 
> I think we either need a corresponding put_domain(d) call when the domain
> loses input focus, or we remove the get_domain(d) based on the fact that
> we don't need it. I think before this patch we didn't increment refcnt
> when a domain has focus but I am not sure it was correct.

I think it was. The code was - aiui - specifically prepared to deal with
domains going away behind its back. A domain having input focus should
not prevent it from being (fully) destroyed.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.