|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] xen/domain: rewrite emulation_flags_ok()
On Wed, 28 May 2025, dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Denis Mukhin <dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> From: Denis Mukhin <dmukhin@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Rewrite emulation_flags_ok() to simplify future modifications.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Mukhin <dmukhin@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - addressed review feedback
> - added some explanatory comments for emulation_flags_ok()
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> index 0363ccb384..1d41d26c4d 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -743,32 +743,88 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct
> xen_domctl_createdomain *config)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Verify that the domain's emulation flags resolve to a supported
> configuration.
> + *
> + * This ensures we only allow a known, safe subset of emulation combinations
> + * (for both functionality and security). Arbitrary mixes are likely to cause
> + * errors (e.g., null pointer dereferences).
> + *
> + * NB: use the internal X86_EMU_XXX symbols, not the public XEN_X86_EMU_XXX
> + * symbols.
> + */
> static bool emulation_flags_ok(const struct domain *d, uint32_t emflags)
> {
> + enum {
> + CAP_PV = BIT(0, U),
> + CAP_HVM = BIT(1, U),
> + CAP_HWDOM = BIT(2, U),
> + CAP_DOMU = BIT(3, U),
> + };
> + static const struct {
> + unsigned int caps;
> + uint32_t min;
> + uint32_t opt;
> + } configs[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PV
> + /* PV */
> + {
> + .caps = CAP_PV | CAP_DOMU,
> + .min = 0,
> + .opt = 0,
> + },
> +
> + /* PV (likely dom0) */
> + {
> + .caps = CAP_PV | CAP_HWDOM,
> + .min = X86_EMU_PIT,
> + .opt = 0,
> + },
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PV */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HVM
> + /* PVH dom0/domU or HVM domU */
> + {
> + .caps = CAP_HVM | CAP_HWDOM,
> + .min = X86_EMU_LAPIC | X86_EMU_IOAPIC | X86_EMU_VPCI,
> + .opt = 0,
> + },
> +
> +
NIT: double \n
I checked carefully and the new semantic matches the old one with the
extra clarification that X86_EMU_PIT is only for hwdom.
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + /* HVM domU */
> + {
> + .caps = CAP_HVM | CAP_DOMU,
> + .min = X86_EMU_ALL & ~(X86_EMU_VPCI | X86_EMU_USE_PIRQ),
> + /* HVM PIRQ feature is user-selectable. */
> + .opt = X86_EMU_USE_PIRQ,
> + },
> +
> + /* PVH */
> + {
> + .caps = CAP_HVM | CAP_DOMU,
> + .min = X86_EMU_LAPIC,
> + .opt = 0,
> + },
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HVM */
> + };
> + unsigned int i, caps = is_hardware_domain(d) ? CAP_HWDOM : CAP_DOMU;
> +
> + if ( is_pv_domain(d) )
> + caps |= CAP_PV;
> + else if ( is_hvm_domain(d) )
> + caps |= CAP_HVM;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_HVM
> /* This doesn't catch !CONFIG_HVM case but it is better than nothing */
> BUILD_BUG_ON(X86_EMU_ALL != XEN_X86_EMU_ALL);
> #endif
>
> - if ( is_hvm_domain(d) )
> - {
> - if ( is_hardware_domain(d) &&
> - emflags != (X86_EMU_VPCI | X86_EMU_LAPIC | X86_EMU_IOAPIC) )
> - return false;
> - if ( !is_hardware_domain(d) &&
> - /* HVM PIRQ feature is user-selectable. */
> - (emflags & ~X86_EMU_USE_PIRQ) !=
> - (X86_EMU_ALL & ~(X86_EMU_VPCI | X86_EMU_USE_PIRQ)) &&
> - emflags != X86_EMU_LAPIC )
> - return false;
> - }
> - else if ( emflags != 0 && emflags != X86_EMU_PIT )
> - {
> - /* PV or classic PVH. */
> - return false;
> - }
> + for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(configs); i++ )
> + if ( caps == configs[i].caps &&
> + (emflags & ~configs[i].opt) == configs[i].min )
> + return true;
>
> - return true;
> + return false;
> }
>
> void __init arch_init_idle_domain(struct domain *d)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |