|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] vpci/header: Emulate legacy capability list for dom0
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 05:05:34PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> Current logic of emulating legacy capability list is only for domU.
> So, expand it to emulate for dom0 too. Then it will be easy to hide
> a capability whose initialization fails in a function.
>
> And restrict adding PCI_STATUS register only for domU since dom0
> has no limitation to access that register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3->v4 changes:
> * Also pass supported_caps to pci_find_next_cap_ttl() for dom0 since the n is
> zero when dom0,
> and add a comment to explain it.
> * Restrict adding PCI_STATUS register only for domU since dom0 has no
> limitation to access that register.
> * For dom0 register handler, set vpci_hw_write8 to it instead of NULL.
>
> v2->v3 changes:
> * Not to add handler of PCI_CAP_LIST_ID when domain is dom0.
>
> v1->v2 changes:
> new patch.
>
> Best regards,
> Jiqian Chen.
> ---
> xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c | 6 +++++
> xen/include/xen/vpci.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> index 3e9b44454b43..a06c518c506c 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> @@ -749,9 +749,9 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> int rc;
> bool mask_cap_list = false;
> + bool is_hwdom = is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain);
>
> - if ( !is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain) &&
> - pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_STATUS) & PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST )
> + if ( pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_STATUS) & PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST )
> {
> /* Only expose capabilities to the guest that vPCI can handle. */
> unsigned int next, ttl = 48;
> @@ -759,12 +759,18 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
> PCI_CAP_ID_MSI,
> PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX,
> };
> + /*
> + * For dom0, we should expose all capabilities instead of a fixed
> + * capabilities array, so setting n to 0 here is to get the next
> + * capability position directly in pci_find_next_cap_ttl.
> + */
> + const unsigned int n = is_hwdom ? 0 : ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps);
>
> next = pci_find_next_cap_ttl(pdev->sbdf, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST,
> - supported_caps,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps), &ttl);
> + supported_caps, n, &ttl);
>
> - rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, NULL,
> + rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val,
> + is_hwdom ? vpci_hw_write8 : NULL,
> PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST, 1,
> (void *)(uintptr_t)next);
> if ( rc )
> @@ -772,7 +778,7 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> next &= ~3;
>
> - if ( !next )
> + if ( !next && !is_hwdom )
> /*
> * If we don't have any supported capabilities to expose to the
> * guest, mask the PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST bit in the status
> @@ -786,15 +792,18 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
>
> next = pci_find_next_cap_ttl(pdev->sbdf,
> pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT,
> - supported_caps,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps), &ttl);
> + supported_caps, n, &ttl);
>
> - rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read8, NULL,
> - pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_ID, 1, NULL);
> - if ( rc )
> - return rc;
> + if ( !is_hwdom )
> + {
> + rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read8, NULL,
> + pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_ID, 1, NULL);
> + if ( rc )
> + return rc;
> + }
>
> - rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, NULL,
> + rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val,
> + is_hwdom ? vpci_hw_write8 : NULL,
> pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT, 1,
> (void *)(uintptr_t)next);
> if ( rc )
> @@ -805,13 +814,17 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
> }
>
> /* Utilize rsvdp_mask to hide PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST from the guest. */
> - return vpci_add_register_mask(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read16,
> vpci_hw_write16,
> - PCI_STATUS, 2, NULL,
> - PCI_STATUS_RO_MASK &
> - ~(mask_cap_list ? PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST :
> 0),
> - PCI_STATUS_RW1C_MASK,
> - mask_cap_list ? PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST : 0,
> - PCI_STATUS_RSVDZ_MASK);
> + return is_hwdom ? 0 : vpci_add_register_mask(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read16,
> + vpci_hw_write16, PCI_STATUS,
> + 2, NULL,
> + PCI_STATUS_RO_MASK &
> + ~(mask_cap_list ?
> + PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST :
> + 0),
> + PCI_STATUS_RW1C_MASK,
> + mask_cap_list ?
> + PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST : 0,
> + PCI_STATUS_RSVDZ_MASK);
Wow, that's a bit too much indentation for my taste. Do you think you
could do:
/* Return early for the hw domain, no masking of PCI_STATUS. */
if ( is_hwdom )
return 0;
...
So that you don't have to touch the current return chunk?
Thanks, Roger.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |