|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] vpci/rebar: Remove registers when init_rebar() fails
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:19:01PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> When init_rebar() fails, the previous new changes will hide Rebar
> capability, it can't rely on vpci_deassign_device() to remove all
> Rebar related registers anymore, those registers must be removed
> fini_rebar().
>
> To do that, call vpci_remove_registers() to remove all possible
> registered registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2->v3 changes:
> * Use fini_rebar() to remove all register instead of in the failure path of
> init_rebar();
>
> v1->v2 changes:
> * Called vpci_remove_registers() to remove all possible registered registers
> instead of using a array to record all registered register.
>
> Best regards,
> Jiqian Chen.
> ---
> xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c
> index 026f8f7972d9..325090afb0f8 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,26 @@ static void cf_check rebar_ctrl_write(const struct pci_dev
> *pdev,
> bar->guest_addr = bar->addr;
> }
>
> +static void fini_rebar(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + uint32_t ctrl;
> + unsigned int nbars;
> + unsigned int rebar_offset = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev->sbdf,
> +
> PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR);
> +
> + if ( !rebar_offset || !is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain) )
Maybe add an ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() here? I don't think we are expected
to get into the cleanup function for the capability if it's not
present, or if the owner of the device is not the hardware domain.
> + return;
> +
> + ctrl = pci_conf_read32(pdev->sbdf, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL(0));
> + nbars = MASK_EXTR(ctrl, PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_MASK);
> + /*
> + * Remove all possible registered registers except header.
> + * Header register will be removed in mask function.
> + */
> + vpci_remove_registers(pdev->vpci, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CAP(0),
> + PCI_REBAR_CTRL(nbars - 1));
> +}
> +
> static int cf_check init_rebar(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> uint32_t ctrl;
> @@ -80,7 +100,7 @@ static int cf_check init_rebar(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> printk(XENLOG_ERR "%pd %pp: too big BAR number %u in
> REBAR_CTRL\n",
> pdev->domain, &pdev->sbdf, index);
> - continue;
> + return -EINVAL;
-E2BIG might be better here. In general I try to avoid using EINVAL,
as it's a catch all that makes differentiating error later on harder.
> }
>
> bar = &pdev->vpci->header.bars[index];
> @@ -88,7 +108,7 @@ static int cf_check init_rebar(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> printk(XENLOG_ERR "%pd %pp: BAR%u is not in memory space\n",
> pdev->domain, &pdev->sbdf, index);
> - continue;
> + return -EINVAL;
Maybe -EDOM here? -ENXIO or EIO might also be appropriate.
Overall looks good.
Thanks, Roger.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |