Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/8] kernel-hacking: introduce CONFIG_NO_AUTO_INLINE

[Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu May 1, 2025 at 3:02 PM UTC, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 02:19:47PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
>> On Tue Apr 29, 2025 at 12:35 PM UTC, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:06:04PM +0800, Chen Linxuan via B4 Relay wrote:
>> >> This series introduces a new kernel configuration option NO_AUTO_INLINE,
>> >> which can be used to disable the automatic inlining of functions.
>> >> 
>> >> This will allow the function tracer to trace more functions
>> >> because it only traces functions that the compiler has not inlined.
>> >
>> > This still feels like a bad idea because it is extremely fragile.
>> 
>> Can you elaborate on that - does it introduce new fragility?
>
> given it needs to sprinkle __always_inline around where it wasn't needed
> before, yeah.

Right, I guess I just wouldn't have associated that with the word
"fragility", but that's a reasonable complaint!

> Also, why would you want this? function tracer is already too much
> output. Why would you want even more?

Yes, tracing every function is already too noisy, this would make it
even more too-noisy, not sure "too noisy" -> "way too noisy" is a
particularly meaningful degradation.

Whereas enlarging the pool of functions that you can _optionally target_
for tracing, or nice reliable breakpoints in GDB, and disasm that's
easier to mentally map back to C, seems like a helpful improvement for
test builds. Personally I sometimes spam a bunch of `noinline` into code
I'm debugging so this seems like a way to just slap that same thing on
the whole tree without dirtying the code, right?

Not that I have a strong opinion on the cost/benefit here, but the
benefit seems nonzero to me.