[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 10/14] x86/xen/msr: Remove pmu_msr_{read,write}()



On 25.04.25 10:34, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
As pmu_msr_{read,write}() are now wrappers of pmu_msr_chk_emulated(),
remove them and use pmu_msr_chk_emulated() directly.

As pmu_msr_chk_emulated() could easily return false in the cases where
it would set *emul to false, remove the "emul" argument and use the
return value instead.

While at it, convert the data type of MSR index to u32 in functions
called in pmu_msr_chk_emulated().

Suggested-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@xxxxxxxxx>
---

Change in v3:
*) Remove the "emul" argument of pmu_msr_chk_emulated() (Juergen Gross).
---
  arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 15 ++++++++-------
  arch/x86/xen/pmu.c          | 30 ++++++------------------------
  arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h      |  3 +--
  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
index 61e51a970f3c..528a2f4df050 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
@@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ static u64 xen_do_read_msr(unsigned int msr, int *err)
  {
        u64 val = 0;    /* Avoid uninitialized value for safe variant. */
- if (pmu_msr_read_emulated(msr, &val))
+       if (pmu_msr_chk_emulated(msr, &val, true))
                return val;
if (err)
@@ -1162,12 +1162,13 @@ static void xen_do_write_msr(unsigned int msr, unsigned 
int low,
        default:
                val = (u64)high << 32 | low;
- if (!pmu_msr_write_emulated(msr, val)) {
-                       if (err)
-                               *err = native_write_msr_safe(msr, low, high);
-                       else
-                               native_write_msr(msr, low, high);
-               }
+               if (pmu_msr_chk_emulated(msr, &val, false))
+                       return;
+
+               if (err)
+                       *err = native_write_msr_safe(msr, low, high);
+               else
+                       native_write_msr(msr, low, high);
        }
  }
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
index b6557f2d1a2e..6bee83018694 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline uint32_t get_fam15h_addr(u32 addr)
        return addr;
  }
-static inline bool is_amd_pmu_msr(unsigned int msr)
+static bool is_amd_pmu_msr(u32 msr)
  {
        if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD &&
            boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
@@ -194,8 +194,7 @@ static bool is_intel_pmu_msr(u32 msr_index, int *type, int 
*index)
        }
  }
-static bool xen_intel_pmu_emulate(unsigned int msr, u64 *val, int type,
-                                 int index, bool is_read)
+static bool xen_intel_pmu_emulate(u32 msr, u64 *val, int type, int index, bool 
is_read)
  {
        uint64_t *reg = NULL;
        struct xen_pmu_intel_ctxt *ctxt;
@@ -257,7 +256,7 @@ static bool xen_intel_pmu_emulate(unsigned int msr, u64 
*val, int type,
        return false;
  }
-static bool xen_amd_pmu_emulate(unsigned int msr, u64 *val, bool is_read)
+static bool xen_amd_pmu_emulate(u32 msr, u64 *val, bool is_read)
  {
        uint64_t *reg = NULL;
        int i, off = 0;
@@ -298,33 +297,16 @@ static bool xen_amd_pmu_emulate(unsigned int msr, u64 
*val, bool is_read)
        return false;
  }
-static bool pmu_msr_chk_emulated(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *val, bool is_read,
-                                bool *emul)
+bool pmu_msr_chk_emulated(u32 msr, u64 *val, bool is_read)
  {
        int type, index = 0;
if (is_amd_pmu_msr(msr))
-               *emul = xen_amd_pmu_emulate(msr, val, is_read);
+               return xen_amd_pmu_emulate(msr, val, is_read);
        else if (is_intel_pmu_msr(msr, &type, &index))
-               *emul = xen_intel_pmu_emulate(msr, val, type, index, is_read);
+               return xen_intel_pmu_emulate(msr, val, type, index, is_read);
        else

Can you please remove the two "else" instances above? With directly returning
form the "if" clause they are no longer needed.

With that you can add my:

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.