[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/hvm: fix write emulation of RO ranges



On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 02:59:45PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.04.2025 12:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:00:16PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 09.04.2025 11:07, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 03:57:17PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>> On 08.04.2025 11:31, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >>>>> When running on AMD hardware in HVM mode the guest linear address (GLA)
> >>>>> will not be provided to hvm_emulate_one_mmio(), and instead is
> >>>>> unconditionally set of ~0.  As a consequence mmio_ro_emulated_write() 
> >>>>> will
> >>>>> always report an error, as the fault GLA generated by the emulation of 
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> access won't be ~0.
> >>>>
> >>>> Which means subpage_mmio_write_accept() is flawed, too, on AMD (or more
> >>>> generally whenever .gla_valid isn't set).
> >>>
> >>> Oh, yes, good catch.  I didn't notice that one.  We should move all
> >>> those checks to use a paddr rather than a gla.
> >>
> >> Really that function could just be passed the offset into the page.
> >>
> >>>>> Fix this by only checking for the fault GLA in mmio_ro_emulated_write()
> >>>>> when the guest is PV.
> >>>>
> >>>> This narrows checking too much, imo. For VT-x we could continue to do so,
> >>>> provided we pass e.g. npfec down into hvm_emulate_one_mmio(), i.e. make
> >>>> the gla_valid flag visible there.
> >>>
> >>> I don't think we should rely on the gla at all in
> >>> mmio_ro_emulated_write(), and instead just use the physical address.
> >>
> >> But you can't validate a physical address against a CR2 value. And I view
> >> this validation as meaningful, to guard (best effort, but still) against
> >> e.g. insn re-writing under our feet.
> > 
> > But we have the mfn in mmio_ro_ctxt, and could possibly use that to
> > validate?  I could expand the context to include the offset also, so
> > that we could fully validate it.
> 
> How would you use the MFN to validate against the VA in CR2?

I would use hvmemul_virtual_to_linear() and hvm_translate_get_page()
to get the underlying mfn of the linear address.  But maybe there's a
part of this that I'm missing, I've certainly haven't tried to
implement any of it.

Thanks, Roger.



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.