[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] x86/vmx: rework VMX wrappers to use `asm goto()`


  • To: dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 21:10:12 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsFNBFLhNn8BEADVhE+Hb8i0GV6mihnnr/uiQQdPF8kUoFzCOPXkf7jQ5sLYeJa0cQi6Penp VtiFYznTairnVsN5J+ujSTIb+OlMSJUWV4opS7WVNnxHbFTPYZVQ3erv7NKc2iVizCRZ2Kxn srM1oPXWRic8BIAdYOKOloF2300SL/bIpeD+x7h3w9B/qez7nOin5NzkxgFoaUeIal12pXSR Q354FKFoy6Vh96gc4VRqte3jw8mPuJQpfws+Pb+swvSf/i1q1+1I4jsRQQh2m6OTADHIqg2E ofTYAEh7R5HfPx0EXoEDMdRjOeKn8+vvkAwhviWXTHlG3R1QkbE5M/oywnZ83udJmi+lxjJ5 YhQ5IzomvJ16H0Bq+TLyVLO/VRksp1VR9HxCzItLNCS8PdpYYz5TC204ViycobYU65WMpzWe LFAGn8jSS25XIpqv0Y9k87dLbctKKA14Ifw2kq5OIVu2FuX+3i446JOa2vpCI9GcjCzi3oHV e00bzYiHMIl0FICrNJU0Kjho8pdo0m2uxkn6SYEpogAy9pnatUlO+erL4LqFUO7GXSdBRbw5 gNt25XTLdSFuZtMxkY3tq8MFss5QnjhehCVPEpE6y9ZjI4XB8ad1G4oBHVGK5LMsvg22PfMJ ISWFSHoF/B5+lHkCKWkFxZ0gZn33ju5n6/FOdEx4B8cMJt+cWwARAQABzSlBbmRyZXcgQ29v cGVyIDxhbmRyZXcuY29vcGVyM0BjaXRyaXguY29tPsLBegQTAQgAJAIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkI CwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCWKD95wIZAQAKCRBlw/kGpdefoHbdD/9AIoR3k6fKl+RFiFpyAhvO 59ttDFI7nIAnlYngev2XUR3acFElJATHSDO0ju+hqWqAb8kVijXLops0gOfqt3VPZq9cuHlh IMDquatGLzAadfFx2eQYIYT+FYuMoPZy/aTUazmJIDVxP7L383grjIkn+7tAv+qeDfE+txL4 SAm1UHNvmdfgL2/lcmL3xRh7sub3nJilM93RWX1Pe5LBSDXO45uzCGEdst6uSlzYR/MEr+5Z JQQ32JV64zwvf/aKaagSQSQMYNX9JFgfZ3TKWC1KJQbX5ssoX/5hNLqxMcZV3TN7kU8I3kjK mPec9+1nECOjjJSO/h4P0sBZyIUGfguwzhEeGf4sMCuSEM4xjCnwiBwftR17sr0spYcOpqET ZGcAmyYcNjy6CYadNCnfR40vhhWuCfNCBzWnUW0lFoo12wb0YnzoOLjvfD6OL3JjIUJNOmJy RCsJ5IA/Iz33RhSVRmROu+TztwuThClw63g7+hoyewv7BemKyuU6FTVhjjW+XUWmS/FzknSi dAG+insr0746cTPpSkGl3KAXeWDGJzve7/SBBfyznWCMGaf8E2P1oOdIZRxHgWj0zNr1+ooF /PzgLPiCI4OMUttTlEKChgbUTQ+5o0P080JojqfXwbPAyumbaYcQNiH1/xYbJdOFSiBv9rpt TQTBLzDKXok86M7BTQRS4TZ/ARAAkgqudHsp+hd82UVkvgnlqZjzz2vyrYfz7bkPtXaGb9H4 Rfo7mQsEQavEBdWWjbga6eMnDqtu+FC+qeTGYebToxEyp2lKDSoAsvt8w82tIlP/EbmRbDVn 7bhjBlfRcFjVYw8uVDPptT0TV47vpoCVkTwcyb6OltJrvg/QzV9f07DJswuda1JH3/qvYu0p vjPnYvCq4NsqY2XSdAJ02HrdYPFtNyPEntu1n1KK+gJrstjtw7KsZ4ygXYrsm/oCBiVW/OgU g/XIlGErkrxe4vQvJyVwg6YH653YTX5hLLUEL1NS4TCo47RP+wi6y+TnuAL36UtK/uFyEuPy wwrDVcC4cIFhYSfsO0BumEI65yu7a8aHbGfq2lW251UcoU48Z27ZUUZd2Dr6O/n8poQHbaTd 6bJJSjzGGHZVbRP9UQ3lkmkmc0+XCHmj5WhwNNYjgbbmML7y0fsJT5RgvefAIFfHBg7fTY/i kBEimoUsTEQz+N4hbKwo1hULfVxDJStE4sbPhjbsPCrlXf6W9CxSyQ0qmZ2bXsLQYRj2xqd1 bpA+1o1j2N4/au1R/uSiUFjewJdT/LX1EklKDcQwpk06Af/N7VZtSfEJeRV04unbsKVXWZAk uAJyDDKN99ziC0Wz5kcPyVD1HNf8bgaqGDzrv3TfYjwqayRFcMf7xJaL9xXedMcAEQEAAcLB XwQYAQgACQUCUuE2fwIbDAAKCRBlw/kGpdefoG4XEACD1Qf/er8EA7g23HMxYWd3FXHThrVQ HgiGdk5Yh632vjOm9L4sd/GCEACVQKjsu98e8o3ysitFlznEns5EAAXEbITrgKWXDDUWGYxd pnjj2u+GkVdsOAGk0kxczX6s+VRBhpbBI2PWnOsRJgU2n10PZ3mZD4Xu9kU2IXYmuW+e5KCA vTArRUdCrAtIa1k01sPipPPw6dfxx2e5asy21YOytzxuWFfJTGnVxZZSCyLUO83sh6OZhJkk b9rxL9wPmpN/t2IPaEKoAc0FTQZS36wAMOXkBh24PQ9gaLJvfPKpNzGD8XWR5HHF0NLIJhgg 4ZlEXQ2fVp3XrtocHqhu4UZR4koCijgB8sB7Tb0GCpwK+C4UePdFLfhKyRdSXuvY3AHJd4CP 4JzW0Bzq/WXY3XMOzUTYApGQpnUpdOmuQSfpV9MQO+/jo7r6yPbxT7CwRS5dcQPzUiuHLK9i nvjREdh84qycnx0/6dDroYhp0DFv4udxuAvt1h4wGwTPRQZerSm4xaYegEFusyhbZrI0U9tJ B8WrhBLXDiYlyJT6zOV2yZFuW47VrLsjYnHwn27hmxTC/7tvG3euCklmkn9Sl9IAKFu29RSo d5bD8kMSCYsTqtTfT6W4A3qHGvIDta3ptLYpIAOD2sY3GYq2nf3Bbzx81wZK14JdDDHUX2Rs 6+ahAA==
  • Cc: anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, julien@xxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, dmukhin@xxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 20:10:24 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 03/04/2025 7:23 pm, dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Denis Mukhin <dmukhin@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Improve error handling in VMX wrappers by switching to `asm goto()` where
> possible.
>
> vmread_safe() kept as is because the minimally required baseline GCC does
> not support output operands in `asm goto`.
>
> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/work_items/210
> Signed-off-by: Denis Mukhin <dmukhin@xxxxxxxx>

I'd suggest limiting this patch to the asm-goto transformations only.

> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/vmx/vmx.h | 141 +++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/vmx/vmx.h 
> b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index ed6a6986b9..19d41f7b90 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -294,54 +294,57 @@ extern uint8_t posted_intr_vector;
>  
>  static always_inline void __vmptrld(u64 addr)
>  {
> -    asm volatile ( "vmptrld %0\n"
> -                   /* CF==1 or ZF==1 --> BUG() */
> -                   UNLIKELY_START(be, vmptrld)
> -                   _ASM_BUGFRAME_TEXT(0)
> -                   UNLIKELY_END_SECTION
> -                   :
> -                   : "m" (addr),
> -                     _ASM_BUGFRAME_INFO(BUGFRAME_bug, __LINE__, __FILE__, 0)
> -                   : "memory" );
> +    asm goto ( "vmptrld %[addr]\n"
> +               "jbe %l[vmfail]\n\t"

Also cosmetic, but the very final line in the asm block ideally doesn't
want the \n\t.  Except, this tends to be hard to spot because of the way
we use macros such as UNLIKELY_START() or _ASM_EXTABLE() which do just
expand to more strings under the hood.

> +               :
> +               : [addr] "m" (addr)
> +               : "memory"
> +               : vmfail );
> +    return;
> +
> + vmfail:
> +    BUG();
>  }
>  
>  static always_inline void __vmpclear(u64 addr)
>  {
> -    asm volatile ( "vmclear %0\n"
> -                   /* CF==1 or ZF==1 --> BUG() */
> -                   UNLIKELY_START(be, vmclear)
> -                   _ASM_BUGFRAME_TEXT(0)
> -                   UNLIKELY_END_SECTION
> -                   :
> -                   : "m" (addr),
> -                     _ASM_BUGFRAME_INFO(BUGFRAME_bug, __LINE__, __FILE__, 0)
> -                   : "memory" );
> +    asm goto ( "vmclear %[addr]\n"
> +               "jbe %l[vmfail]\n\t"
> +               :
> +               : [addr] "m" (addr)
> +               : "memory"
> +               : vmfail );
> +    return;
> +
> + vmfail:
> +    BUG();
>  }
>  
>  static always_inline void __vmread(unsigned long field, unsigned long *value)
>  {
> -    asm volatile ( "vmread %1, %0\n\t"
> -                   /* CF==1 or ZF==1 --> BUG() */
> -                   UNLIKELY_START(be, vmread)
> -                   _ASM_BUGFRAME_TEXT(0)
> -                   UNLIKELY_END_SECTION
> -                   : "=rm" (*value)
> -                   : "r" (field),
> -                     _ASM_BUGFRAME_INFO(BUGFRAME_bug, __LINE__, __FILE__, 0)
> -        );
> +    bool vmfail;
> +
> +    asm volatile ( "vmread %[field], %[value]\n\t"
> +                    "setbe %[vmfail]\n\t"
> +                    : [value] "=rm" (*value), [vmfail] "=rm" (vmfail)
> +                    : [field] "r" (field)
> +                    : "cc" );
> +    if ( vmfail )
> +        BUG();

This is almost certainly not an improvement in generated code.  You now
need register to hold the boolean, where previously there was a jbe to a
ud2 and no extra state required.

Here's an example https://godbolt.org/z/GG4r1c7bK showing the
difference.   (It also shows up the Clang "rm" constraint bug.  Change
vmfail from "=rm" to "=r" to get sane(er) code generation.)

Also, you've added a "cc" clobber.  This is one thing you don't need on
x86; it's simply assumed, given how many instructions update flags
naturally.

> @@ -369,22 +372,22 @@ static inline enum vmx_insn_errno vmread_safe(unsigned 
> long field,
>  static inline enum vmx_insn_errno vmwrite_safe(unsigned long field,
>                                                 unsigned long value)
>  {
> -    unsigned long ret = VMX_INSN_SUCCEED;
> -    bool fail_invalid, fail_valid;
> +    unsigned long ret;
>  
> -    asm volatile ( "vmwrite %[value], %[field]\n\t"
> -                   ASM_FLAG_OUT(, "setc %[invalid]\n\t")
> -                   ASM_FLAG_OUT(, "setz %[valid]\n\t")
> -                   : ASM_FLAG_OUT("=@ccc", [invalid] "=rm") (fail_invalid),
> -                     ASM_FLAG_OUT("=@ccz", [valid] "=rm") (fail_valid)
> -                   : [field] "r" (field),
> -                     [value] "rm" (value) );
> +    asm goto ( "vmwrite %[value], %[field]\n\t"
> +               "jc %l[vmfail_invalid]\n\t"
> +               "jz %l[vmfail_error]\n\t"
> +               :
> +               : [field] "r" (field), [value] "rm" (value)
> +               :
> +               : vmfail_invalid, vmfail_error );
> +    return VMX_INSN_SUCCEED;
>  
> -    if ( unlikely(fail_invalid) )
> -        ret = VMX_INSN_FAIL_INVALID;
> -    else if ( unlikely(fail_valid) )
> -        __vmread(VM_INSTRUCTION_ERROR, &ret);
> + vmfail_invalid:
> +    return VMX_INSN_FAIL_INVALID;
>  
> + vmfail_error:
> +    __vmread(VM_INSTRUCTION_ERROR, &ret);

Something not technically toolchain cleanup, but is in desperate need of
doing.

__vmread() being void and producing an output by pointer is insane, and
leads to ugly code such as this, even if the compiler can usually fix up
behind the scenes.

It would be lovely to have:

unsigned long vmread(unsigned int field)

which can be wrapped by __vmread() with "*value = vmread(field);" or
so.  (Don't go converting all users; that's a huge task).

Then, this vmfail_error can be simply "return
vmread(VM_INSTRUCTION_ERROR);" and you can drop the ret variable.

~Andrew



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.