Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling v2

["Orzel, Michal" <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>]

On 19/03/2025 15:01, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue Mar 18, 2025 at 9:00 AM GMT, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> We are missing a way to detect whether a user provided a value for
>> nr_spis equal to 0 or did not provide any value (default is also 0) which
>> can cause issues when calculated nr_spis is > 0 and the value from domain
>> config is 0. Fix it by setting default value for nr_spis to UINT32_MAX
>> (max supported nr of SPIs is 960 anyway).
>>
>> Fixes: 55d62b8d4636 ("tools/arm: Reject configuration with incorrect nr_spis 
>> value")
>> Reported-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c     | 7 ++++---
>>  tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
>> index 2d895408cac3..5bb5bac61def 100644
>> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
>> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
>> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc,
>>                                        libxl_domain_config *d_config,
>>                                        struct xen_domctl_createdomain 
>> *config)
>>  {
>> -    uint32_t nr_spis = 0;
>> +    uint32_t nr_spis = 0, cfg_nr_spis = d_config->b_info.arch_arm.nr_spis;
>>      unsigned int i;
>>      uint32_t vuart_irq, virtio_irq = 0;
>>      bool vuart_enabled = false, virtio_enabled = false;
>> @@ -181,13 +181,14 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc,
>>
>>      LOG(DEBUG, "Configure the domain");
>>
>> -    if (nr_spis > d_config->b_info.arch_arm.nr_spis) {
>> +    /* We use UINT32_MAX to denote if a user provided a value or not */
>> +    if ((cfg_nr_spis != UINT32_MAX) && (nr_spis > cfg_nr_spis)) {
>>          LOG(ERROR, "Provided nr_spis value is too small (minimum required 
>> %u)\n",
>>              nr_spis);
>>          return ERROR_FAIL;
>>      }
>>
>> -    config->arch.nr_spis = max(nr_spis, d_config->b_info.arch_arm.nr_spis);
>> +    config->arch.nr_spis = (cfg_nr_spis != UINT32_MAX) ? cfg_nr_spis : 
>> nr_spis;
>>      LOG(DEBUG, " - Allocate %u SPIs", config->arch.nr_spis);
>>
>>      switch (d_config->b_info.arch_arm.gic_version) {
>> diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl 
>> b/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl
>> index bd4b8721ff19..129c00ce929c 100644
>> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl
>> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl
>> @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ libxl_domain_build_info = Struct("domain_build_info",[
>>      ("arch_arm", Struct(None, [("gic_version", libxl_gic_version),
>>                                 ("vuart", libxl_vuart_type),
>>                                 ("sve_vl", libxl_sve_type),
>> -                               ("nr_spis", uint32),
>> +                               ("nr_spis", uint32, {'init_val': 
>> 'UINT32_MAX'}),
>>                                ])),
>>      ("arch_x86", Struct(None, [("msr_relaxed", libxl_defbool),
>>                                ])),
> 
> Doesn't this regenerate the golang bindings?
FYI, it does not. The bindings are already there for NrSpis and default value is
does not result in a change (for verification I checked max_grant_frames that
uses LIBXL_MAX_GRANT_DEFAULT).

~Michal