[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 3/3] CHANGELOG: Minimum toolchain requirements
On 3/20/25 4:59 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> --- CC: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> CC: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx> --- CHANGELOG.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md index 9a5919585d43..4e333e608a96 100644 --- a/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/CHANGELOG.md @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/) ## [4.21.0 UNRELEASED](https://xenbits.xenproject.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=staging) - TBD ### Changed + - The minimum toolchain requirements have been increased to either: + - GCC 5.1 and Binutils 2.25, or + - Clang/LLVM 11 I think we want here to specify for which architectures it was done as RISC-V, for example, uses different versions: - GCC 12.2 or later - GNU Binutils 2.39 or later And for clang the version will be 17 as: f873029386dd415cd9caa78f600a593d9570c9ae("[BOLT] Add minimal RISC-V 64-bit support") $ git tag --contains f873029386dd415cd9caa78f600a593d9570c9ae llvmorg-17.0.0 ... I have some patch to build Xen RISC-V using clang-17 but I haven't sent to upstream yet as I am not really sure that if we need (or why we need) clang support just from the start. ~ Oleksii
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |