[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] xen/arm: ffa: Enable VM to VM without firmware


  • To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:24:48 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=arm.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=uJDk9iMhHIfWAxfGb4UmJff0X6lwV69ph0p5zU41ses=; b=SVkrAGxhNS07pv9g30//I8FpKqBm48B9s0kMCHuBfcyMxgCL7ZLQMBG79BjWwCn2XBbq8RXvEujCQ40fp2sxDPxhrpGUL7UNaIOJvpyq0JNGAFnyomN9ACtoVqyyqF/QxeXQHhQYNtP5qknmSX1bYn1GYWkKbfvBz35fLLYXIb0fwvrZhhSPh11ZgtCX3ZW3jabPX3g+uPWrThUq//JmhBxHVd4uiIuvKtmk70k7k9CSuJoxvzZ8+RRZqdWOWUcw2478Y4IigZ/Yvsw9BZ44pcysJrN6ryPGo2r8n1EYL3hsfchQ4E07jko8pO31uECVMjR7JdanezhhvxZbhPoDqg==
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=uJDk9iMhHIfWAxfGb4UmJff0X6lwV69ph0p5zU41ses=; b=WNfsjUIH0R30FisR/uPcZ7+CGtYIeYEQNCuM1Kwhsyq6FWNL+KLcijraAnS2Rcbah+MlPehOgdFNVHRdrTL/FjVwbBu7V+sBKdgGQTZADpbBA4/5w72Tqe6dxNxtpJvZjL6l8Fm/LTXVf95tyTPhU9+v10cieSr9nw244/ojH9zZdSBMsTDWczIxslzKBj9xBgK2S3fIcTyxEpR8kwUbpT1U0L0KOTiyU0gWeNKW1JHj8vu7+cuqbC0lJ8OdAb/xFsWRgur62h4R/MbPgwH7ZQcyKcpuWSMJbx8Xi6L858qiMoVLQhOTGxfuOmVU36qFWbkj1jSkGiBiRlG2mHMmMQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=xGvFT8senL4pnmW6/zCETCamJFKINcyt5Q3oNyh6SiRpxDGzuZZWth5jFgwQoP7xYqNZAe3kr1KOPxicuqQljfKNDSxlVyGcPAFDC1QV9gP8+t8gmlG52xaJEwmtCYQbar0YiicHJo+TKSKgM5hTF8JlR4WDomZhWvayXryozHq+ur0PZsAONZhc9nGAO3ilulAHXhdkcAguVV2Btm2vMMolBmi1BrLHspBKNapOHNPpHMraApTOFb578p17D7EjRQQzeEoZ2N3ENCF1g2sbKTBYjcGSFFMFD/4x4/sYhF6Mqww8nW+zQmDPp5xIuL+l9SRbVglxiIXWDldesdj/LA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=pLoaaVs03TWL5GCba3xUkDFJU319Ae01BGFQroWZjNNBJWh2UuMQAbzAiLfwJAXFDDF8m8lcccglYlwJxSrBM1iid6IARpvNNcIs/ApkUlDolvck+dMbiXtWbsjXNzk4KvAzlIs28QuxN+qrXGdOg868vXCuCgEuBrD99fbaIjX3bWVbZ428D8nfVUOiEYvpFHxU/HDwQrt0Le3p2yaK00g9SY2c8Iwky5pUKJf2hmu8pDhVp3FwQ7OrJpkAhldChV+WkIuuXDFA7WNTLj/vLluL4Gk2DRbQR12ZXfJb6YHC/Q083E2I6kovnIUKPu8xEEeiawVT+XdfBy/66FyArQ==
  • Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:25:10 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Nodisclaimer: true
  • Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Thread-index: AQHbkcvqUcfBAkFPRke6B/ThQimwz7N9WnkAgAAIEIA=
  • Thread-topic: [PATCH v2 5/5] xen/arm: ffa: Enable VM to VM without firmware

Hi Jens,

> On 21 Mar 2025, at 09:55, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bertrand,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 3:51 PM Bertrand Marquis
> <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> When VM to VM support is activated and there is no suitable FF-A support
>> in the firmware, enable FF-A support for VMs to allow using it for VM to
>> VM communications.
>> If there is Optee running in the secure world and using the non FF-A
> 
> It's spelled OP-TEE in text, and optee or OPTEE in identifiers.

ack

> 
>> communication system, having CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM could be non functional
>> (if optee is probed first) or Optee could be non functional (if FF-A is
>> probed first) so it is not recommended to activate the configuration
>> option for such systems.
>> 
>> To make buffer full notification work between VMs when there is not
> 
> s/not/no/

ack

> 
>> firmware, rework the notification handling and modify the global flag to
>> only be used as check for firmware notification support instead.
>> 
>> Modify part_info_get to return the list of VMs when there is no firmware
>> support.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED when possible
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c          |  12 +++-
>> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c    | 114 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c |   3 +-
>> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
>> index 3bbdd7168a6b..f6582d2e855a 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
>> @@ -324,8 +324,9 @@ static int ffa_domain_init(struct domain *d)
>>     struct ffa_ctx *ctx;
>>     int ret;
>> 
>> -    if ( !ffa_fw_version )
>> +    if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) && !ffa_fw_version )
>>         return -ENODEV;
>> +
>>     /*
>>      * We are using the domain_id + 1 as the FF-A ID for VMs as FF-A ID 0 is
>>      * reserved for the hypervisor and we only support secure endpoints using
>> @@ -549,6 +550,15 @@ err_no_fw:
>>     bitmap_zero(ffa_fw_abi_supported, FFA_ABI_BITMAP_SIZE);
>>     printk(XENLOG_WARNING "ARM FF-A No firmware support\n");
>> 
>> +    if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) )
>> +    {
>> +        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ffa_teardown_head);
>> +        init_timer(&ffa_teardown_timer, ffa_teardown_timer_callback, NULL, 
>> 0);
>> +
>> +        printk(XENLOG_INFO "ARM FF-A only available between VMs\n");
>> +        return true;
>> +    }
>> +
>>     return false;
>> }
>> 
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
>> index d19aa5c5bef6..0673e53a9def 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>> 
>> #include "ffa_private.h"
>> 
>> -static bool __ro_after_init notif_enabled;
>> +static bool __ro_after_init fw_notif_enabled;
>> static unsigned int __ro_after_init notif_sri_irq;
>> 
>> int ffa_handle_notification_bind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> @@ -27,21 +27,17 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_bind(struct cpu_user_regs 
>> *regs)
>>     uint32_t bitmap_lo = get_user_reg(regs, 3);
>>     uint32_t bitmap_hi = get_user_reg(regs, 4);
>> 
>> -    if ( !notif_enabled )
>> -        return FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> -
>>     if ( (src_dst & 0xFFFFU) != ffa_get_vm_id(d) )
>>         return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> 
>>     if ( flags )    /* Only global notifications are supported */
>>         return FFA_RET_DENIED;
>> 
>> -    /*
>> -     * We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the sender
>> -     * endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
>> -     */
>> -    return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags, bitmap_lo,
>> -                           bitmap_hi);
>> +    if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(src_dst>>16) && fw_notif_enabled )
> 
> Please add space before and after '>>', here and in the function below
> in this patch.

ack

> 
>> +        return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags,
>> +                               bitmap_lo, bitmap_hi);
>> +
>> +    return FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> }
>> 
>> int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> @@ -51,32 +47,34 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs 
>> *regs)
>>     uint32_t bitmap_lo = get_user_reg(regs, 3);
>>     uint32_t bitmap_hi = get_user_reg(regs, 4);
>> 
>> -    if ( !notif_enabled )
>> -        return FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> -
>>     if ( (src_dst & 0xFFFFU) != ffa_get_vm_id(d) )
>>         return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> 
>> -    /*
>> -     * We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the
>> -     * destination endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
>> -     */
>> -    return  ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, bitmap_lo,
>> -                            bitmap_hi);
>> +    if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(src_dst>>16) && fw_notif_enabled )
>> +        return  ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, 
>> bitmap_lo,
>> +                                bitmap_hi);
>> +
>> +    return FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> }
>> 
>> void ffa_handle_notification_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> {
>>     struct domain *d = current->domain;
>>     struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee;
>> +    bool notif_pending = false;
>> 
>> -    if ( !notif_enabled )
>> +    if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) && !fw_notif_enabled )
>>     {
>>         ffa_set_regs_error(regs, FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED);
>>         return;
>>     }
>> 
>> -    if ( test_and_clear_bool(ctx->notif.secure_pending) )
>> +    notif_pending = ctx->notif.secure_pending;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM
>> +    notif_pending |= ctx->notif.buff_full_pending;
>> +#endif
> 
> Shouldn't ctx->notif.secure_pending and ctx->notif.secure_pending be
> cleared also, like:
> notif_pending = test_and_clear_bool(ctx->notif.secure_pending) ||
>                test_and_clear_bool(ctx->notif.buff_full_pending);

Notification info get is returning who has pending notification but only
notification get should erase pending notifications.

> 
>> +
>> +    if ( notif_pending )
>>     {
>>         /* A pending global notification for the guest */
>>         ffa_set_regs(regs, FFA_SUCCESS_64, 0,
>> @@ -103,7 +101,7 @@ void ffa_handle_notification_get(struct cpu_user_regs 
>> *regs)
>>     uint32_t w6 = 0;
>>     uint32_t w7 = 0;
>> 
>> -    if ( !notif_enabled )
>> +    if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) && !fw_notif_enabled )
>>     {
>>         ffa_set_regs_error(regs, FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED);
>>         return;
>> @@ -115,7 +113,8 @@ void ffa_handle_notification_get(struct cpu_user_regs 
>> *regs)
>>         return;
>>     }
>> 
>> -    if ( flags & ( FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_SP | FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_SPM ) )
>> +    if ( fw_notif_enabled && (flags & ( FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_SP
>> +                                        | FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_SPM )) )
> 
> Please end the previous line with the '|' operator.

ack

> 
>>     {
>>         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs arg = {
>>             .a0 = FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET,
>> @@ -170,15 +169,14 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_set(struct cpu_user_regs 
>> *regs)
>>     uint32_t bitmap_lo = get_user_reg(regs, 3);
>>     uint32_t bitmap_hi = get_user_reg(regs, 4);
>> 
>> -    if ( !notif_enabled )
>> -        return FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> -
>>     if ( (src_dst >> 16) != ffa_get_vm_id(d) )
>>         return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> 
>> -    /* Let the SPMC check the destination of the notification */
>> -    return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET, src_dst, flags, bitmap_lo,
>> -                           bitmap_hi);
>> +    if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(src_dst>>16) && fw_notif_enabled )
>> +        return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET, src_dst, flags, 
>> bitmap_lo,
>> +                               bitmap_hi);
>> +
>> +    return FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> }
>> 
>> #ifdef CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM
>> @@ -190,7 +188,7 @@ void ffa_raise_rx_buffer_full(struct domain *d)
>>         return;
>> 
>>     if ( !test_and_set_bool(ctx->notif.buff_full_pending) )
>> -        vgic_inject_irq(d, d->vcpu[0], notif_sri_irq, true);
>> +        vgic_inject_irq(d, d->vcpu[0], GUEST_FFA_NOTIF_PEND_INTR_ID, true);
> 
> Please move this to the patch "xen/arm: ffa: Add buffer full
> notification support"

Ack

> 
>> }
>> #endif
>> 
>> @@ -363,7 +361,7 @@ void ffa_notif_init_interrupt(void)
>> {
>>     int ret;
>> 
>> -    if ( notif_enabled && notif_sri_irq < NR_GIC_SGI )
>> +    if ( fw_notif_enabled && notif_sri_irq < NR_GIC_SGI )
>>     {
>>         /*
>>          * An error here is unlikely since the primary CPU has already
>> @@ -394,41 +392,41 @@ void ffa_notif_init(void)
>>     int ret;
>> 
>>     /* Only enable fw notification if all ABIs we need are supported */
>> -    if ( !(ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP_CREATE) &&
>> -           ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP_DESTROY) &&
>> -           ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET) &&
>> -           ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET_64)) )
>> -        return;
>> -
>> -    arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&arg, &resp);
>> -    if ( resp.a0 != FFA_SUCCESS_32 )
>> -        return;
>> -
>> -    irq = resp.a2;
>> -    notif_sri_irq = irq;
>> -    if ( irq >= NR_GIC_SGI )
>> -        irq_set_type(irq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING);
>> -    ret = request_irq(irq, 0, notif_irq_handler, "FF-A notif", NULL);
>> -    if ( ret )
>> +    if ( ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP_CREATE) &&
>> +         ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP_DESTROY) &&
>> +         ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET) &&
>> +         ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET_64) )
>>     {
>> -        printk(XENLOG_ERR "ffa: request_irq irq %u failed: error %d\n",
>> -               irq, ret);
>> -        return;
>> -    }
>> +        arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&arg, &resp);
>> +        if ( resp.a0 != FFA_SUCCESS_32 )
>> +            return;
>> 
>> -    notif_enabled = true;
>> +        irq = resp.a2;
>> +        notif_sri_irq = irq;
>> +        if ( irq >= NR_GIC_SGI )
>> +            irq_set_type(irq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING);
>> +        ret = request_irq(irq, 0, notif_irq_handler, "FF-A notif", NULL);
>> +        if ( ret )
>> +        {
>> +            printk(XENLOG_ERR "ffa: request_irq irq %u failed: error %d\n",
>> +                   irq, ret);
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +        fw_notif_enabled = true;
>> +    }
>> }
>> 
>> int ffa_notif_domain_init(struct domain *d)
>> {
>>     int32_t res;
>> 
>> -    if ( !notif_enabled )
>> -        return 0;
>> +    if ( fw_notif_enabled )
>> +    {
>> 
>> -    res = ffa_notification_bitmap_create(ffa_get_vm_id(d), d->max_vcpus);
>> -    if ( res )
>> -        return -ENOMEM;
>> +        res = ffa_notification_bitmap_create(ffa_get_vm_id(d), 
>> d->max_vcpus);
>> +        if ( res )
>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>> +    }
>> 
>>     return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -439,6 +437,6 @@ void ffa_notif_domain_destroy(struct domain *d)
>>      * Call bitmap_destroy even if bitmap create failed as the SPMC will
>>      * return a DENIED error that we will ignore.
>>      */
>> -    if ( notif_enabled )
>> +    if ( fw_notif_enabled )
>>         ffa_notification_bitmap_destroy(ffa_get_vm_id(d));
>> }
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c 
>> b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c
>> index 7af1eca2d0c4..291396c8f635 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c
>> @@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ void ffa_handle_partition_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs 
>> *regs)
>>         goto out;
>>     }
>> 
>> -    if ( !ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET) )
>> +    if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) &&
> 
> Doesn't this belong in the patch "xen/arm: ffa: Introduce VM to VM support"?
> And wouldn't ffa_vm_count make more sense?

ack. I will modify that and fold it into the VM to VM support patch.

Cheers
Bertrand

> 
> Cheers,
> Jens
> 
>> +         !ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET) )
>>     {
>>         /* Just give an empty partition list to the caller */
>>         ret = FFA_RET_OK;
>> --
>> 2.47.1



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.