[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v6] Avoid crash calling PrintErrMesg from efi_multiboot2
On 20.03.2025 15:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 3:02 PM Frediano Ziglio > <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 2:26 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 26.02.2025 19:54, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:31:00PM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:16 PM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki >>>>> <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:57:13PM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 8:20 PM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki >>>>>>> <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 04:26:59PM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote: >>>>>>>>> Although code is compiled with -fpic option data is not position >>>>>>>>> independent. This causes data pointer to become invalid if >>>>>>>>> code is not relocated properly which is what happens for >>>>>>>>> efi_multiboot2 which is called by multiboot entry code. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Code tested adding >>>>>>>>> PrintErrMesg(L"Test message", EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL); >>>>>>>>> in efi_multiboot2 before calling efi_arch_edd (this function >>>>>>>>> can potentially call PrintErrMesg). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Before the patch (XenServer installation on Qemu, xen replaced >>>>>>>>> with vanilla xen.gz): >>>>>>>>> Booting `XenServer (Serial)'Booting `XenServer (Serial)' >>>>>>>>> Test message: !!!! X64 Exception Type - 0E(#PF - Page-Fault) CPU >>>>>>>>> Apic ID - 00000000 !!!! >>>>>>>>> ExceptionData - 0000000000000000 I:0 R:0 U:0 W:0 P:0 PK:0 SS:0 >>>>>>>>> SGX:0 >>>>>>>>> RIP - 000000007EE21E9A, CS - 0000000000000038, RFLAGS - >>>>>>>>> 0000000000210246 >>>>>>>>> RAX - 000000007FF0C1B5, RCX - 0000000000000050, RDX - >>>>>>>>> 0000000000000010 >>>>>>>>> RBX - 0000000000000000, RSP - 000000007FF0C180, RBP - >>>>>>>>> 000000007FF0C210 >>>>>>>>> RSI - FFFF82D040467CE8, RDI - 0000000000000000 >>>>>>>>> R8 - 000000007FF0C1C8, R9 - 000000007FF0C1C0, R10 - >>>>>>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>>>>>> R11 - 0000000000001020, R12 - FFFF82D040467CE8, R13 - >>>>>>>>> 000000007FF0C1B8 >>>>>>>>> R14 - 000000007EA33328, R15 - 000000007EA332D8 >>>>>>>>> DS - 0000000000000030, ES - 0000000000000030, FS - >>>>>>>>> 0000000000000030 >>>>>>>>> GS - 0000000000000030, SS - 0000000000000030 >>>>>>>>> CR0 - 0000000080010033, CR2 - FFFF82D040467CE8, CR3 - >>>>>>>>> 000000007FC01000 >>>>>>>>> CR4 - 0000000000000668, CR8 - 0000000000000000 >>>>>>>>> DR0 - 0000000000000000, DR1 - 0000000000000000, DR2 - >>>>>>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>>>>>> DR3 - 0000000000000000, DR6 - 00000000FFFF0FF0, DR7 - >>>>>>>>> 0000000000000400 >>>>>>>>> GDTR - 000000007F9DB000 0000000000000047, LDTR - 0000000000000000 >>>>>>>>> IDTR - 000000007F48E018 0000000000000FFF, TR - 0000000000000000 >>>>>>>>> FXSAVE_STATE - 000000007FF0BDE0 >>>>>>>>> !!!! Find image based on IP(0x7EE21E9A) (No PDB) >>>>>>>>> (ImageBase=000000007EE20000, EntryPoint=000000007EE23935) !!!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After the patch: >>>>>>>>> Booting `XenServer (Serial)'Booting `XenServer (Serial)' >>>>>>>>> Test message: Buffer too small >>>>>>>>> BdsDxe: loading Boot0000 "UiApp" from >>>>>>>>> Fv(7CB8BDC9-F8EB-4F34-AAEA-3EE4AF6516A1)/FvFile(462CAA21-7614-4503-836E-8AB6F4662331) >>>>>>>>> BdsDxe: starting Boot0000 "UiApp" from >>>>>>>>> Fv(7CB8BDC9-F8EB-4F34-AAEA-3EE4AF6516A1)/FvFile(462CAA21-7614-4503-836E-8AB6F4662331) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This partially rollback commit 00d5d5ce23e6. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fixes: 9180f5365524 ("x86: add multiboot2 protocol support for EFI >>>>>>>>> platforms") >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I tried testing this patch, but it seems I cannot reproduce the >>>>>>>> original >>>>>>>> failure... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did as the commit message suggests here: >>>>>>>> https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/marmarek/xen/-/commit/ca3d6911c448eb886990f33d4380b5646617a982 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> With blexit() in PrintErrMesg(), it went back to the bootloader, so I'm >>>>>>>> sure this code path was reached. But with blexit() commented out, Xen >>>>>>>> started correctly both with and without this patch... The branch I used >>>>>>>> is here: >>>>>>>> https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/marmarek/xen/-/commits/automation-tests?ref_type=heads >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are there some extra condition to reproduce the issue? Maybe it depends >>>>>>>> on the compiler version? I guess I can try also on QEMU, but based on >>>>>>>> the description, I would expect it to crash in any case. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did you see the correct message in both cases? >>>>>>> Did you use Grub or direct EFI? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With Grub and without this patch you won't see the message, with grub >>>>>>> with the patch you see the correct message. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did use grub, and I didn't see the message indeed. >>>>>> But in the case it was supposed to crash (with added PrintErrMesg(), >>>>>> commented out blexit and without your patch) it did _not_ crashed and >>>>>> continued to normal boot. Is that #PF non-fatal here? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I tried again with my test environment. >>>>> Added the PrintErrMesg line before efi_arch_edd call, I got a #PF, in >>>>> my case the system hangs. With the fix patch machine is rebooting and >>>>> I can see the message in the logs. >>>>> I'm trying with Xen starting inside Qemu, EFI firmware, xen.gz >>>>> compiled as ELF file. Host system is an Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS. Gcc is >>>>> version 11.4. >>>> >>>> My test was wrong, commenting out blexit made "mesg" variable unused. >>>> After fixing that, I can reproduce it on both QEMU and real hardware: >>>> without your patch it crashes and with your patch it works just fine. >>>> While there may be more places with similar issue, this patch clearly >>>> improves the situation, so: >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> This had to be reverted, for breaking the build with old Clang. See the >>> respective Matrix conversation. >> >> To sum up the failure is: >> >> clang: error: unknown argument: '-fno-jump-tables' > > Now that the minimum clang version supports this option, can this > change be applied? Not sure. I for one would expect that we actively reject building with too old tool chains then, which is yet to be carried out. Plus I think you'd want to re-submit, with all tags dropped. The change was wrong to go in at that earlier point, and hence any such tags weren't quite accurate. Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |