[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 01/16] iommu: Add checks before calling iommu suspend/resume
Hi, On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 6:45 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 05.03.2025 10:11, Mykola Kvach wrote: > > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > > @@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ int __init iommu_setup(void) > > > > int iommu_suspend(void) > > { > > - if ( iommu_enabled ) > > + if ( iommu_enabled && iommu_get_ops() && iommu_get_ops()->suspend ) > > return iommu_call(iommu_get_ops(), suspend); > > > > return 0; > > @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ int iommu_suspend(void) > > > > void iommu_resume(void) > > { > > - if ( iommu_enabled ) > > + if ( iommu_enabled && iommu_get_ops() && iommu_get_ops()->resume ) > > iommu_vcall(iommu_get_ops(), resume); > > } > > When iommu_enabled is true, surely iommu_get_ops() is required to return > non-NULL? As far as I can see, in some cases, the handler is still checked even if iommu_enabled is true, such as in the case of the iommu_quiesce call. However, it might be better to drop this patch from the current patch series or add a patch that introduces the handlers. > > Jan Best regards, Mykola
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |