|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] docs/xen-headers: use alphabetical sorting for @incontents
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:19:33AM +0000, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 06:01:56PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > From: Frédéric Pierret (fepitre) <frederic.pierret@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > It makes the build reproducible with fileordering flags
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pierret (fepitre) <frederic.pierret@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > docs/xen-headers | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/docs/xen-headers b/docs/xen-headers
> > index 8c434d77e20e..98ffe814500b 100755
> > --- a/docs/xen-headers
> > +++ b/docs/xen-headers
> > @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ sub output_index () {
> > <h2>Starting points</h2>
> > <ul>
> > END
> > - foreach my $ic (sort { $a->{Seq} <=> $b->{Seq} or $a->{Title} cmp
> > $b->{Title} } @incontents) {
> > + foreach my $ic (sort { $a->{Href} cmp $b->{Href} } @incontents) {
>
> Why is `Seq` been ignored? As I understand, the index is supposed to use
> it as first ordering key.
>
> Comment in that same file:
> # extra syntax:
> # `incontents <seq> <shortname> <anchor text html>...
> # make a table of contents entry; they
> # will be sorted by increasing seq, and
> # shortname will be used as the anchor target
>
> Also, we already have a fix for reproducible build:
> e18dadc5b709 ("docs: use predictable ordering in generated documentation")
>
> Would it be enough to replace `Title` by `Href` for the second sorting
> key instead?
Hmm, right. It looks like this may be not needed anymore, as long as
title is unique (it looks like it is right now).
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
Attachment:
signature.asc
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |