Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] x86/dom0: be less restrictive with the Interrupt Address Range

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 03:27:18PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.02.2025 17:48, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > First two patches are preparatory changes to reduce the changes required
> > in patch 3.  I would have wanted those to go in 4.20 to fix the issues
> > on Lenovo Thinkpads, but it's too late now.
> > 
> > Thanks, Roger.
> > 
> > Roger Pau Monne (3):
> >   x86/dom0: correctly set the maximum ->iomem_caps bound for PVH
> >   x86/iommu: account for IOMEM caps when populating dom0 IOMMU
> >     page-tables
> >   x86/dom0: be less restrictive with the Interrupt Address Range
> 
> I'm uncertain whether to take this and "x86/pvh: workaround missing MMIO
> regions in dom0 p2m" for backport. The sole Fixes: tag is in patch 1 here.
> Thoughts?

At least the ones here would be helpful for the reported Lenovo
Thinkpad issue.  The PVH p2m addition would be nice IMO.

Thanks, Roger.