[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: blowfish failure to compile


  • To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:06:27 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:06:47 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 12.02.2025 18:20, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> I've noticed the following failure in XenServer's build environment
> 
>> make[6]: Leaving directory
>> '/builddir/build/BUILD/xen-4.19.1/tools/tests/x86_emulator'
>> In file included from /usr/include/features.h:535,
>>                  from /usr/include/bits/libc-header-start.h:33,
>>                  from /usr/include/stdint.h:26,
>>                  from
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-xenserver-linux/12/include/stdint.h:9,
>>                  from blowfish.c:18:
>> /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:11: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such
>> file or directory
>>     7 | # include <gnu/stubs-32.h>
>>       |           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> compilation terminated.
>> make[6]: *** [testcase.mk:15: blowfish.bin] Error 1
> 
> It's non-fatal, but it reduces the content in test_x86_emulator which we
> do care about running.

Hmm, yes, I did see such in the past, and solved it by putting the seemingly
missing header in place on the distro.

> Elsewhere in the tree we fix this with -ffreestanding -nostdinc
> -I$(XEN_ROOT)/tools/firmware/include but that isn't an option for
> test_x86_emulator in general which is hosted.
> 
> However, it is an option for blowfish.c specifically which is
> freestanding, and for which we build a 32bit form in an otherwise 64bit
> build.
> 
> Therefore, it stands to reason that:
> 
> diff --git a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile
> b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile
> index 294d27ebaa08..e46fd8becb96 100644
> --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ HOSTCFLAGS += -m32 -I..
>  
>  else
>  
> -blowfish-cflags := ""
> -blowfish-cflags-x86_32 := "-mno-accumulate-outgoing-args -Dstatic="
> +blowfish-cflags := "-ffreestanding -nostdinc
> -I$(XEN_ROOT)/tools/firmware/include "
> +blowfish-cflags-x86_32 := "$(blowfish-cflags)
> -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args -Dstatic="

What this does is request the shared (between 32- and 64-bit)) flavor to
be built differently, with the options "-ffreestanding -nostdinc
-I$(XEN_ROOT)/tools/firmware/include". And then the (kind of) nested use
of double quotes in blowfish-cflags-x86_32 ends up asking for several
32-bit flavors: One with -ffreestanding, one with -nostdinc, one with
-I$(XEN_ROOT)/tools/firmware/include (which is what causes the
strangeness you saw), and the pre-existing one with
"-mno-accumulate-outgoing-args -Dstatic=".

Every set of options grouped together by double quotes (or any unquoted
option) designates a flavor (while the quotation isn't meaningful to
make aiui, its use is in a shell construct, where those quotes play
their usual role). That is,

blowfish-cflags := ""

designates a flavor without any special options. What I understand you
want, though, is to have these flags passed to all of the blowfish
flavors.

What complicates things slightly is that the first of the options names
the flavor (i.e. prior to your change, but with my APX changes in place,
we have

blowfish_x86_32[]
blowfish_x86_32_mno_accumulate_outgoing_args[]
blowfish_x86_64[]
blowfish_x86_64_DREX2[]
blowfish_x86_64_mapxf[]

resulting from

blowfish-cflags := ""
blowfish-cflags-x86_32 := "-mno-accumulate-outgoing-args -Dstatic="
blowfish-cflags-x86_64 := "-DREX2 -Dstatic=" "-mapxf -Dstatic="

. I think you can see now how the compiler ends up choking on

blowfish_x86_32_I/local/xen.spec/scm/tools/tests/x86_emulator/../../../tools/firmware/include[]

.) Surely we could accommodate for the added options by changing the
references from test_x86_emulator.c, but maybe there's a better way
(and also potentially useful for other test blobs going forward),
modifying the .h generator rule(s):

                $(MAKE) -f testcase.mk TESTCASE=$* XEN_TARGET_ARCH=$(arch) 
$*-cflags="$$cflags $($*-cflags-common)" all; \

and then the needed addition simply being

blowfish-cflags-common := -ffreestanding -nostdinc 
-I$(XEN_ROOT)/tools/firmware/include

Entirely untested, though, for now.

However, further: The freestanding-ness does apply to all of the test
blobs, doesn't it? Why don't we alter

CFLAGS += -fno-builtin -g0 $($(TESTCASE)-cflags) $(CFLAGS-VSZ)

in testcase.mk to become

CFLAGS += -ffreestanding -nostdinc -I$(XEN_ROOT)/tools/firmware/include
CFLAGS += -g0 $($(TESTCASE)-cflags) $(CFLAGS-VSZ)

(which doesn't appear to become dependent upon anything we don't already
have available in this file, i.e. in particular $(XEN_ROOT) is already
used elsewhere), seeing that -ffreestanding implies -fno-builtin?

>> blowfish.h:617:99: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or
>> ‘__attribute__’ before ‘/’ token
>>   617 | static const unsigned int __attribute__((section(".test,
>> \"ax\", @progbits #")))
>> blowfish_x86_32_I/local/xen.spec/scm/tools/tests/x86_emulator/../../../tools/firmware/include[]
>> = {
>>      
>> |                                                                            
>>                       
>> ^
> 
> and at this point I've got completely lost in this build system.  The .h
> generation seems to loop over each cflag, and while that looks plausible
> for vector generation, I can't see how it works (except by accident) for
> blowfish.
> 
> The problem is the generation of $flavor, but this logic is completely
> opaque.

Can you suggest how to achieve the same in a less opaque way? (Surely it
having grown over time has made quite a bit worse what may have been
okay-ish in the beginning.)

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.