[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-4.20 1/2] x86/shutdown: quiesce devices ahead of AP shutdown


  • To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:29:14 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:29:22 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 04.02.2025 12:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 11:13:09AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 28.01.2025 17:27, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>>> @@ -1803,6 +1803,38 @@ int iommu_do_pci_domctl(
>>>      return ret;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +struct segment_iter {
>>> +    int (*handler)(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *arg);
>>> +    void *arg;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int cf_check iterate_all(struct pci_seg *pseg, void *arg)
>>> +{
>>> +    const struct segment_iter *iter = arg;
>>> +    struct pci_dev *pdev;
>>> +
>>> +    list_for_each_entry ( pdev, &pseg->alldevs_list, alldevs_list )
>>> +    {
>>> +        int rc = iter->handler(pdev, iter->arg);
>>> +
>>> +        if ( rc )
>>> +            return rc;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int pci_iterate_devices(int (*handler)(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *arg),
>>> +                        void *arg)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct segment_iter iter = {
>>> +        .handler = handler,
>>> +        .arg = arg,
>>> +    };
>>> +
>>> +    return pci_segments_iterate(iterate_all, &iter);
>>> +}
>>
>> For the specific purpose during shutdown it may be okay to do all of this
>> without locking (but see below) and without preemption checks. Yet then a
>> warning will want putting here to indicate that from other environments
>> this isn't okay to use as-is.
>>
>> This use then also requires that msi{,x}_set_enable() paths never gain
>> lock-related assertions.
> 
> Good point.  It might be better to just wrap the code in
> pci_iterate_devices() with pcidevs_{,un}lock().

I'd recommend against doing so. If this was just for ordinary reboot or
shutdown, then yes. But we can crash with this (or any other) lock held.
And this particular lock we hold for sometimes pretty long sequences of
code.

There's anyway the wider issue of how much code we want to involve in
rebooting (or kexec-ing) after a crash: The more we do, the more likely
that we run into a knock-on issue from the earlier crash.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.