|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [XEN PATCH] xen/arm: ffa: fix bind/unbind notification
The notification bitmask is in passed in the FF-A ABI in two 32-bit
registers w3 and w4. The lower 32-bits should go in w3 and the higher in
w4. These two registers has unfortunately been swapped for
FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND and FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND in the FF-A mediator.
So fix that by using the correct registers.
Fixes: b490f470f58d ("xen/arm: ffa: support notification")
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
index 21b9e78f6399..00efaf8f7353 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_bind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
* We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the sender
* endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
*/
- return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags, bitmap_hi,
- bitmap_lo);
+ return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags, bitmap_lo,
+ bitmap_hi);
}
int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
* We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the
* destination endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
*/
- return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, bitmap_hi,
- bitmap_lo);
+ return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, bitmap_lo,
+ bitmap_hi);
}
void ffa_handle_notification_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
--
2.43.0
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |