[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 25/25] drm/xlnx: Compute dumb-buffer sizes with drm_mode_size_dumb()
- To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mripard@xxxxxxxxxx, airlied@xxxxxxxxx, simona@xxxxxxxx
- From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 14:45:51 +0100
- Authentication-results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=TFLFJF3X; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=qSe023yu
- Autocrypt: addr=tzimmermann@xxxxxxx; keydata= xsBNBFs50uABCADEHPidWt974CaxBVbrIBwqcq/WURinJ3+2WlIrKWspiP83vfZKaXhFYsdg XH47fDVbPPj+d6tQrw5lPQCyqjwrCPYnq3WlIBnGPJ4/jreTL6V+qfKRDlGLWFjZcsrPJGE0 BeB5BbqP5erN1qylK9i3gPoQjXGhpBpQYwRrEyQyjuvk+Ev0K1Jc5tVDeJAuau3TGNgah4Yc hdHm3bkPjz9EErV85RwvImQ1dptvx6s7xzwXTgGAsaYZsL8WCwDaTuqFa1d1jjlaxg6+tZsB 9GluwvIhSezPgnEmimZDkGnZRRSFiGP8yjqTjjWuf0bSj5rUnTGiyLyRZRNGcXmu6hjlABEB AAHNJ1Rob21hcyBaaW1tZXJtYW5uIDx0emltbWVybWFubkBzdXNlLmRlPsLAjgQTAQgAOAIb AwULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBHIX+6yM6c9jRKFo5WgNwR1TC3ojBQJftODH AAoJEGgNwR1TC3ojx1wH/0hKGWugiqDgLNXLRD/4TfHBEKmxIrmfu9Z5t7vwUKfwhFL6hqvo lXPJJKQpQ2z8+X2vZm/slsLn7J1yjrOsoJhKABDi+3QWWSGkaGwRJAdPVVyJMfJRNNNIKwVb U6B1BkX2XDKDGffF4TxlOpSQzdtNI/9gleOoUA8+jy8knnDYzjBNOZqLG2FuTdicBXblz0Mf vg41gd9kCwYXDnD91rJU8tzylXv03E75NCaTxTM+FBXPmsAVYQ4GYhhgFt8S2UWMoaaABLDe 7l5FdnLdDEcbmd8uLU2CaG4W2cLrUaI4jz2XbkcPQkqTQ3EB67hYkjiEE6Zy3ggOitiQGcqp j//OwE0EWznS4AEIAMYmP4M/V+T5RY5at/g7rUdNsLhWv1APYrh9RQefODYHrNRHUE9eosYb T6XMryR9hT8XlGOYRwKWwiQBoWSDiTMo/Xi29jUnn4BXfI2px2DTXwc22LKtLAgTRjP+qbU6 3Y0xnQN29UGDbYgyyK51DW3H0If2a3JNsheAAK+Xc9baj0LGIc8T9uiEWHBnCH+RdhgATnWW GKdDegUR5BkDfDg5O/FISymJBHx2Dyoklv5g4BzkgqTqwmaYzsl8UxZKvbaxq0zbehDda8lv hFXodNFMAgTLJlLuDYOGLK2AwbrS3Sp0AEbkpdJBb44qVlGm5bApZouHeJ/+n+7r12+lqdsA EQEAAcLAdgQYAQgAIAIbDBYhBHIX+6yM6c9jRKFo5WgNwR1TC3ojBQJftOH6AAoJEGgNwR1T C3ojVSkIALpAPkIJPQoURPb1VWjh34l0HlglmYHvZszJWTXYwavHR8+k6Baa6H7ufXNQtThR yIxJrQLW6rV5lm7TjhffEhxVCn37+cg0zZ3j7zIsSS0rx/aMwi6VhFJA5hfn3T0TtrijKP4A SAQO9xD1Zk9/61JWk8OysuIh7MXkl0fxbRKWE93XeQBhIJHQfnc+YBLprdnxR446Sh8Wn/2D Ya8cavuWf2zrB6cZurs048xe0UbSW5AOSo4V9M0jzYI4nZqTmPxYyXbm30Kvmz0rYVRaitYJ 4kyYYMhuULvrJDMjZRvaNe52tkKAvMevcGdt38H4KSVXAylqyQOW5zvPc4/sq9c=
- Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Yan <andyshrk@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:45:57 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Hi
Am 15.01.25 um 14:33 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen:
[...]
Yeah, there are constrains in the scanline and buffer alignments and
orientation. And if we say that bpp==12 means NV12, it will be a
problem for all other cases where bpp==12 makes sense.
I feel I still don't quite understand. Can't we define and document
CREATE_DUMB like this:
If (bpp < 8 || is_power_of_two(bpp))
bpp means bitsperpixel
pitch is args->width * args->bpp / 8, aligned up to
driver-specific-align
else
bpp is a legacy parameter, and we deal with it case by case.
list the cases and what they mean
And describe that when allocating subsampled buffers, the caller must
adjust the width and height accordingly. And that the bpp and width
can also refer to pixel groups.
Or if the currently existing code prevents the above for 16 and 32
bpps, how about defining that any non-RGB or not-simple buffer has to
be allocated with bpp=8, and the userspace has to align the pitch
correctly according to the format and platform's hw restrictions?
What if a hardware requires certain per-format alignments? Or requires
certain alignments for each plane? Or only supports tile modes? Or has
strict limits on the maximum buffer size?
It is not possible to encode all this in a simple 32-bit value. So
user-space code has to be aware of all this and tweak bpp-based
allocation to make it work. Obviously you can use the current UAPI for
your use case. It's just not optimal or future proof.
Best regards
Thomas
Tomi
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
|