[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] xen: add bitmap to indicate per-domain state changes
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:46:00 +0100
- Autocrypt: addr=jgross@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsBNBFOMcBYBCACgGjqjoGvbEouQZw/ToiBg9W98AlM2QHV+iNHsEs7kxWhKMjrioyspZKOB ycWxw3ie3j9uvg9EOB3aN4xiTv4qbnGiTr3oJhkB1gsb6ToJQZ8uxGq2kaV2KL9650I1SJve dYm8Of8Zd621lSmoKOwlNClALZNew72NjJLEzTalU1OdT7/i1TXkH09XSSI8mEQ/ouNcMvIJ NwQpd369y9bfIhWUiVXEK7MlRgUG6MvIj6Y3Am/BBLUVbDa4+gmzDC9ezlZkTZG2t14zWPvx XP3FAp2pkW0xqG7/377qptDmrk42GlSKN4z76ELnLxussxc7I2hx18NUcbP8+uty4bMxABEB AAHNH0p1ZXJnZW4gR3Jvc3MgPGpncm9zc0BzdXNlLmNvbT7CwHkEEwECACMFAlOMcK8CGwMH CwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCw3p3WKL8TL8eZB/9G0juS/kDY9LhEXseh mE9U+iA1VsLhgDqVbsOtZ/S14LRFHczNd/Lqkn7souCSoyWsBs3/wO+OjPvxf7m+Ef+sMtr0 G5lCWEWa9wa0IXx5HRPW/ScL+e4AVUbL7rurYMfwCzco+7TfjhMEOkC+va5gzi1KrErgNRHH kg3PhlnRY0Udyqx++UYkAsN4TQuEhNN32MvN0Np3WlBJOgKcuXpIElmMM5f1BBzJSKBkW0Jc Wy3h2Wy912vHKpPV/Xv7ZwVJ27v7KcuZcErtptDevAljxJtE7aJG6WiBzm+v9EswyWxwMCIO RoVBYuiocc51872tRGywc03xaQydB+9R7BHPzsBNBFOMcBYBCADLMfoA44MwGOB9YT1V4KCy vAfd7E0BTfaAurbG+Olacciz3yd09QOmejFZC6AnoykydyvTFLAWYcSCdISMr88COmmCbJzn sHAogjexXiif6ANUUlHpjxlHCCcELmZUzomNDnEOTxZFeWMTFF9Rf2k2F0Tl4E5kmsNGgtSa aMO0rNZoOEiD/7UfPP3dfh8JCQ1VtUUsQtT1sxos8Eb/HmriJhnaTZ7Hp3jtgTVkV0ybpgFg w6WMaRkrBh17mV0z2ajjmabB7SJxcouSkR0hcpNl4oM74d2/VqoW4BxxxOD1FcNCObCELfIS auZx+XT6s+CE7Qi/c44ibBMR7hyjdzWbABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlOMcBYCGwwACgkQsN6d 1ii/Ey9D+Af/WFr3q+bg/8v5tCknCtn92d5lyYTBNt7xgWzDZX8G6/pngzKyWfedArllp0Pn fgIXtMNV+3t8Li1Tg843EXkP7+2+CQ98MB8XvvPLYAfW8nNDV85TyVgWlldNcgdv7nn1Sq8g HwB2BHdIAkYce3hEoDQXt/mKlgEGsLpzJcnLKimtPXQQy9TxUaLBe9PInPd+Ohix0XOlY+Uk QFEx50Ki3rSDl2Zt2tnkNYKUCvTJq7jvOlaPd6d/W0tZqpyy7KVay+K4aMobDsodB3dvEAs6 ScCnh03dDAFgIq5nsB11j3KPKdVoPlfucX2c7kGNH+LUMbzqV6beIENfNexkOfxHfw==
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 16:46:09 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 07.01.25 17:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.01.2025 11:17, Juergen Gross wrote:
Add a bitmap with one bit per possible domid indicating the respective
domain has changed its state (created, deleted, dying, crashed,
shutdown).
Registering the VIRQ_DOM_EXC event will result in setting the bits for
all existing domains and resetting all other bits.
As the usage of this bitmap is tightly coupled with the VIRQ_DOM_EXC
event, it is meant to be used only by a single consumer in the system,
just like the VIRQ_DOM_EXC event.
Resetting a bit will be done in a future patch.
This information is needed for Xenstore to keep track of all domains.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
---
V2:
- use DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED instead of DOMID_MASK + 1 (Jan Beulich)
- use const (Jan Beulich)
- move call of domain_reset_states() into evtchn_bind_virq() (Jan Beulich)
- dynamically allocate dom_state_changed bitmap (Jan Beulich)
V3:
- use xvzalloc_array() (Jan Beulich)
- don't rename existing label (Jan Beulich)
V4:
- add __read_mostly (Jan Beulich)
- use __set_bit() (Jan Beulich)
This change looks to have been lost, ...
- fix error handling in evtchn_bind_virq() (Jan Beulich)
V5:
- domain_init_states() may be called only if evtchn_bind_virq() has been
called validly (Jan Beulich)
V6:
- guard dom_state_changed bitmap with d->event_lock (Jan Beulich)
... without it being mentioned anywhere, and without it becoming clear why
it would have needed undoing.
Oh, thanks for spotting. I changed that by accident and missed to undo
this change.
--- a/xen/common/domain.c
+++ b/xen/common/domain.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <xen/irq.h>
#include <xen/argo.h>
#include <xen/llc-coloring.h>
+#include <xen/xvmalloc.h>
#include <asm/p2m.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <public/sched.h>
@@ -139,6 +140,51 @@ bool __read_mostly vmtrace_available;
bool __read_mostly vpmu_is_available;
+static unsigned long *__read_mostly dom_state_changed;
+
+int domain_init_states(void)
+{
+ const struct domain *d;
+
+ ASSERT(!dom_state_changed);
+ ASSERT(rw_is_write_locked(¤t->domain->event_lock));
rw_is_write_locked_by_me()?
Yes, probably better.
+ dom_state_changed = xvzalloc_array(unsigned long,
+ BITS_TO_LONGS(DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED));
+ if ( !dom_state_changed )
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ rcu_read_lock(&domlist_read_lock);
+
+ for_each_domain ( d )
+ set_bit(d->domain_id, dom_state_changed);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock(&domlist_read_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void domain_deinit_states(const struct domain *d)
+{
+ ASSERT(rw_is_write_locked(&d->event_lock));
Again.
Yes.
Juergen
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|