[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] xen: add bitmap to indicate per-domain state changes
On 07.01.25 17:14, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.01.2025 11:17, Juergen Gross wrote:Add a bitmap with one bit per possible domid indicating the respective domain has changed its state (created, deleted, dying, crashed, shutdown). Registering the VIRQ_DOM_EXC event will result in setting the bits for all existing domains and resetting all other bits. As the usage of this bitmap is tightly coupled with the VIRQ_DOM_EXC event, it is meant to be used only by a single consumer in the system, just like the VIRQ_DOM_EXC event. Resetting a bit will be done in a future patch. This information is needed for Xenstore to keep track of all domains. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> --- V2: - use DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED instead of DOMID_MASK + 1 (Jan Beulich) - use const (Jan Beulich) - move call of domain_reset_states() into evtchn_bind_virq() (Jan Beulich) - dynamically allocate dom_state_changed bitmap (Jan Beulich) V3: - use xvzalloc_array() (Jan Beulich) - don't rename existing label (Jan Beulich) V4: - add __read_mostly (Jan Beulich) - use __set_bit() (Jan Beulich)This change looks to have been lost, ...- fix error handling in evtchn_bind_virq() (Jan Beulich) V5: - domain_init_states() may be called only if evtchn_bind_virq() has been called validly (Jan Beulich) V6: - guard dom_state_changed bitmap with d->event_lock (Jan Beulich)... without it being mentioned anywhere, and without it becoming clear why it would have needed undoing. Oh, thanks for spotting. I changed that by accident and missed to undo this change. --- a/xen/common/domain.c +++ b/xen/common/domain.c @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ #include <xen/irq.h> #include <xen/argo.h> #include <xen/llc-coloring.h> +#include <xen/xvmalloc.h> #include <asm/p2m.h> #include <asm/processor.h> #include <public/sched.h> @@ -139,6 +140,51 @@ bool __read_mostly vmtrace_available;bool __read_mostly vpmu_is_available; +static unsigned long *__read_mostly dom_state_changed;+ +int domain_init_states(void) +{ + const struct domain *d; + + ASSERT(!dom_state_changed); + ASSERT(rw_is_write_locked(¤t->domain->event_lock));rw_is_write_locked_by_me()? Yes, probably better. + dom_state_changed = xvzalloc_array(unsigned long, + BITS_TO_LONGS(DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED)); + if ( !dom_state_changed ) + return -ENOMEM; + + rcu_read_lock(&domlist_read_lock); + + for_each_domain ( d ) + set_bit(d->domain_id, dom_state_changed); + + rcu_read_unlock(&domlist_read_lock); + + return 0; +} + +void domain_deinit_states(const struct domain *d) +{ + ASSERT(rw_is_write_locked(&d->event_lock));Again. Yes. Juergen Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |