Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] lib: Remove dead code

["Ariel Otilibili-Anieli" <Ariel.Otilibili-Anieli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday, December 20, 2024 09:53 CET, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 09:44:31AM +0100, Ariel Otilibili-Anieli wrote:
> > On Friday, December 20, 2024 08:09 CET, Greg KH 
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:45:01PM +0100, Ariel Otilibili wrote:
> > > > This is a follow up from a discussion in Xen:
> > > > 
> > > > The if-statement tests `res` is non-zero; meaning the case zero is 
> > > > never reached.
> > > > 
> > > > Link: 
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/7587b503-b2ca-4476-8dc9-e9683d4ca5f0@xxxxxxxx/
> > > > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> > > > Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ariel Otilibili <ariel.otilibili-anieli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > --
> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > 
> > > Why is "removing dead code" a stable kernel thing?
> > 
> > Hello Greg,
> > 
> > It is what I understood from the process:
> > 
> > "Attaching a Fixes: tag does not subvert the stable kernel rules process 
> > nor the requirement to Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on all stable patch 
> > candidates." [1]
> > 
> > Does my understanding make sense?
> 
> I'm confused, what are you expecting to happen here?  Why is this even
> marked as a "fix"?
> 
> > [1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
> 
> Please read:
>     https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html

I am, Greg; thanks for the heads up.
> 
> for the stable kernel rules.
> 
> Again, you have a "cc: stable@..." in your patch, why?

Removed stable from the thread.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h