Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] vfio/pci: Use never-managed version of pci_intx()

[Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:21:30 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> [cc->to: Alex W]
> 
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 02:06:28PM +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be managed through
> > devres. To remove this hybrid nature from pci_intx(), it is necessary to
> > port users to either an always-managed or a never-managed version.
> > 
> > vfio enables its PCI-Device with pci_enable_device(). Thus, it
> > needs the never-managed version.
> > 
> > Replace pci_intx() with pci_intx_unmanaged().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@xxxxxxxxxx>  
> 
> Not applied yet, pending ack from Alex.

Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c  |  2 +-
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c 
> > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> > index 1ab58da9f38a..90240c8d51aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> > @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int vfio_pci_core_enable(struct vfio_pci_core_device 
> > *vdev)
> >             if (vfio_pci_nointx(pdev)) {
> >                     pci_info(pdev, "Masking broken INTx support\n");
> >                     vdev->nointx = true;
> > -                   pci_intx(pdev, 0);
> > +                   pci_intx_unmanaged(pdev, 0);
> >             } else
> >                     vdev->pci_2_3 = pci_intx_mask_supported(pdev);
> >     }
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c 
> > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> > index 8382c5834335..40abb0b937a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static bool __vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct 
> > vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> >      */
> >     if (unlikely(!is_intx(vdev))) {
> >             if (vdev->pci_2_3)
> > -                   pci_intx(pdev, 0);
> > +                   pci_intx_unmanaged(pdev, 0);
> >             goto out_unlock;
> >     }
> >  
> > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static bool __vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct 
> > vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> >              * mask, not just when something is pending.
> >              */
> >             if (vdev->pci_2_3)
> > -                   pci_intx(pdev, 0);
> > +                   pci_intx_unmanaged(pdev, 0);
> >             else
> >                     disable_irq_nosync(pdev->irq);
> >  
> > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_intx_unmask_handler(void *opaque, 
> > void *data)
> >      */
> >     if (unlikely(!is_intx(vdev))) {
> >             if (vdev->pci_2_3)
> > -                   pci_intx(pdev, 1);
> > +                   pci_intx_unmanaged(pdev, 1);
> >             goto out_unlock;
> >     }
> >  
> > @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int vfio_intx_enable(struct vfio_pci_core_device 
> > *vdev,
> >      */
> >     ctx->masked = vdev->virq_disabled;
> >     if (vdev->pci_2_3) {
> > -           pci_intx(pdev, !ctx->masked);
> > +           pci_intx_unmanaged(pdev, !ctx->masked);
> >             irqflags = IRQF_SHARED;
> >     } else {
> >             irqflags = ctx->masked ? IRQF_NO_AUTOEN : 0;
> > @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void vfio_msi_disable(struct 
> > vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool msix)
> >      * via their shutdown paths.  Restore for NoINTx devices.
> >      */
> >     if (vdev->nointx)
> > -           pci_intx(pdev, 0);
> > +           pci_intx_unmanaged(pdev, 0);
> >  
> >     vdev->irq_type = VFIO_PCI_NUM_IRQS;
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 2.47.1
> >   
>