Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

[Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:14:22 -0800 Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> On 12/10/2024 2:02 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> > This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
> > secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
> > that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with
> > Coccinelle. [2] This is part 1 that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies()
> > that use the multiply pattern of either of:
> > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000), or
> > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)
> > 
> > where N is a constant, to avoid the multiplication.
> > 
> > The entire conversion is made with Coccinelle in the script added in
> > patch 2. Some changes suggested by Coccinelle have been deferred to
> > later parts that will address other possible variant patterns.
> > 
> > CC: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I have the same question as before: How do you expect these to land?
> Do you now have a maintainer who will take all of them?
> Or do you want individual maintainers to take the ones applicable to them?

I'll just grab everything and see if anyone complains ;)