[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] xen/arm: Check for Static Heap feature when freeing resources
- To: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- From: Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 14:22:37 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=arm.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=mjg6SbQSrbWZeOUJmTnq+i/dGyvRusweKp9+LjxjinA=; b=swYlE1uX8Fxy30adtFWucCodK5A9UoT1/Zo3cs/eP50t1tkKCsbXSNNC8I1HuEk5M7liGE9uloJybHzrUxDhW/9O7DX1lcYXjQ8YqYVMBbv9UfOQL00UaujyCcT9ROMxijciD0bzAJazTi0gz1RYPtoFwHEhYEEKZbHI9zc9KRIricAbq7u1lv4I2wwaGe1ypDGRi2bMbAL0o5zc3GTDg9pyFX4Qz7HmobWSmavEcWQIOs8/B//n/T5vKZr/jA6tBqFWeMTfHc4KDu68GPByHqXxR8GEsBX9sfTb/bQWjOa1gKHzGC0Kg+hBB1ObCzTg9eOnrje1q1htKy2qDhLInQ==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=mjg6SbQSrbWZeOUJmTnq+i/dGyvRusweKp9+LjxjinA=; b=Q/YdKLbkkZF5p2wwMnHOKNEx98uI1YDSTtk4xE212WmkuCOWJi1ToLDWIJk238sjY5lUEl52s/nn37nWOoEDKHd8HJfIL3rXt5WR7PUG4CCXaPIEXSL8+xL/d3yCe1FFmHQQEdvJv+VfxT2IwpOGVhpRk9/aInF2bFbw3lmM8V/lGdbPI4TJ0biuLUXFR16Y7jg4hb8QsOHpzMgJ/enXB2oINCiYt83A120NFVRYWOY7WYgxlGZFKT71cTc/2DauULwnAaYWwvNf6YIJ2dP9Rmp6zXr4nMXQPBujutuQQEIa3VUxeDQNpqtJl5+IV5sX8gbwE1lnO3p61+QtQJ2NjQ==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=GN+uYZ7TbidrRLp3htBSEsJ+EMzCfq2O2gWIs3ihYuYbqc/IslMC/MyxHZNAso8x2aNHXGpXnxuq9LqLOEqi9Mt5NeXAZ0DsO2xIsp/A9PEY6V8FjDU0k1Td20zHNoKclpvlJ7ycZbzFB9cVbYsucXDcT7MrXDvL9bZ1lChk60eBZEmDLMNwPeT89DZL/ITpVzFoEjyKNEqy0GHO4YDWR8kzZ95MQCanOCDOmovsHYKRznGyFG9ywBtXJKn3DO8xP7tHnIfuQKS4fopRxsxegGtAZUcGLpkvQ7UcQ8BBXq6grgH2Jmbv+LyFF8zitqHGQ3b4ThqiBiLfqWC4GTe6hw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ay1U1DwpJ5a/FZfNU8AP7Kpxl6xdn+BBmvHkP3AQ/GR7PKCw72CyU6JReyJW9ZZTmMX+R6W9VnkeZfX10QigrrKxoCB38MkJIW+lKKooZfh9wai6IecavgDv2coUBsw8ZnJ+6n2nDtRpWR7wy/+ZqSVf9y3Bb0rx8ew1Zp8nI3AF0WAW0PuovmbizXV+mc/Cg4wlJzfUJPRgDK+Xhgj1P18093wdMOhIVaCiyAJv8glLYKT1QRsvU/NUzgh6dcm6rax0kC9PjxIstYCdkFusvowObduBIcDPEOEgOIZ7vA13DojTVovNs7CQ37vosQ4sEbwVBYi3ERDv+S+gDJJlTQ==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Penny Zheng <Penny.Zheng@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 14:23:16 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHbRWiMK0NBCC8wPk6qtayhLuvPaLLZnNkAgAE/IIA=
- Thread-topic: [PATCH v4 4/5] xen/arm: Check for Static Heap feature when freeing resources
Hi Julien,
> On 6 Dec 2024, at 19:19, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 03/12/2024 09:48, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/mmu/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/mmu/setup.c
>> index 9664e85ee6c0..8c87649bc88e 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/mmu/setup.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mmu/setup.c
>> @@ -341,8 +341,12 @@ void free_init_memory(void)
>> if ( rc )
>> panic("Unable to remove the init section (rc = %d)\n", rc);
>> - init_domheap_pages(pa, pa + len);
>> - printk("Freed %ldkB init memory.\n",
>> (long)(__init_end-__init_begin)>>10);
>> + if ( !using_static_heap )
>> + {
>> + init_domheap_pages(pa, pa + len);
>> + printk("Freed %ldkB init memory.\n",
>> + (long)(__init_end-__init_begin) >> 10);
>> + }
>> }
>> /**
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
>> index 2e27af4560a5..22ab342dc8f4 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
>> @@ -206,24 +206,25 @@ void __init discard_initial_modules(void)
>> struct bootmodules *mi = &bootinfo.modules;
>> int i;
>
> Looking at the change below, it seems that discard_initial_modules()
> is a NOP for static_heap. Do you forsee any reason where it would be
> different?
you are right, the code could be a lot simpler.
I’ve prepared a diff on top of this patch if you are ok to do that on commit,
but
It won’t be a problem for me to send another patch for that.
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
index 22ab342dc8f4..85f743a2c6ad 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
@@ -206,25 +206,27 @@ void __init discard_initial_modules(void)
struct bootmodules *mi = &bootinfo.modules;
int i;
- if ( !using_static_heap )
- {
- for ( i = 0; i < mi->nr_mods; i++ )
- {
- paddr_t s = mi->module[i].start;
- paddr_t e = s + PAGE_ALIGN(mi->module[i].size);
+ if ( using_static_heap )
+ return;
- if ( mi->module[i].kind == BOOTMOD_XEN )
- continue;
+ for ( i = 0; i < mi->nr_mods; i++ )
+ {
+ paddr_t s = mi->module[i].start;
+ paddr_t e = s + PAGE_ALIGN(mi->module[i].size);
- if ( !mfn_valid(maddr_to_mfn(s)) ||
- !mfn_valid(maddr_to_mfn(e)) )
- continue;
+ if ( mi->module[i].kind == BOOTMOD_XEN )
+ continue;
- fw_unreserved_regions(s, e, init_domheap_pages, 0);
- }
+ if ( !mfn_valid(maddr_to_mfn(s)) ||
+ !mfn_valid(maddr_to_mfn(e)) )
+ continue;
- mi->nr_mods = 0;
+ fw_unreserved_regions(s, e, init_domheap_pages, 0);
}
+
+ mi->nr_mods = 0;
+
+ remove_early_mappings();
}
/* Relocate the FDT in Xen heap */
|