[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 5/6] tools: add a dedicated header file for barrier definitions


  • To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 08:33:56 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jgross@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsBNBFOMcBYBCACgGjqjoGvbEouQZw/ToiBg9W98AlM2QHV+iNHsEs7kxWhKMjrioyspZKOB ycWxw3ie3j9uvg9EOB3aN4xiTv4qbnGiTr3oJhkB1gsb6ToJQZ8uxGq2kaV2KL9650I1SJve dYm8Of8Zd621lSmoKOwlNClALZNew72NjJLEzTalU1OdT7/i1TXkH09XSSI8mEQ/ouNcMvIJ NwQpd369y9bfIhWUiVXEK7MlRgUG6MvIj6Y3Am/BBLUVbDa4+gmzDC9ezlZkTZG2t14zWPvx XP3FAp2pkW0xqG7/377qptDmrk42GlSKN4z76ELnLxussxc7I2hx18NUcbP8+uty4bMxABEB AAHNH0p1ZXJnZW4gR3Jvc3MgPGpncm9zc0BzdXNlLmNvbT7CwHkEEwECACMFAlOMcK8CGwMH CwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCw3p3WKL8TL8eZB/9G0juS/kDY9LhEXseh mE9U+iA1VsLhgDqVbsOtZ/S14LRFHczNd/Lqkn7souCSoyWsBs3/wO+OjPvxf7m+Ef+sMtr0 G5lCWEWa9wa0IXx5HRPW/ScL+e4AVUbL7rurYMfwCzco+7TfjhMEOkC+va5gzi1KrErgNRHH kg3PhlnRY0Udyqx++UYkAsN4TQuEhNN32MvN0Np3WlBJOgKcuXpIElmMM5f1BBzJSKBkW0Jc Wy3h2Wy912vHKpPV/Xv7ZwVJ27v7KcuZcErtptDevAljxJtE7aJG6WiBzm+v9EswyWxwMCIO RoVBYuiocc51872tRGywc03xaQydB+9R7BHPzsBNBFOMcBYBCADLMfoA44MwGOB9YT1V4KCy vAfd7E0BTfaAurbG+Olacciz3yd09QOmejFZC6AnoykydyvTFLAWYcSCdISMr88COmmCbJzn sHAogjexXiif6ANUUlHpjxlHCCcELmZUzomNDnEOTxZFeWMTFF9Rf2k2F0Tl4E5kmsNGgtSa aMO0rNZoOEiD/7UfPP3dfh8JCQ1VtUUsQtT1sxos8Eb/HmriJhnaTZ7Hp3jtgTVkV0ybpgFg w6WMaRkrBh17mV0z2ajjmabB7SJxcouSkR0hcpNl4oM74d2/VqoW4BxxxOD1FcNCObCELfIS auZx+XT6s+CE7Qi/c44ibBMR7hyjdzWbABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlOMcBYCGwwACgkQsN6d 1ii/Ey9D+Af/WFr3q+bg/8v5tCknCtn92d5lyYTBNt7xgWzDZX8G6/pngzKyWfedArllp0Pn fgIXtMNV+3t8Li1Tg843EXkP7+2+CQ98MB8XvvPLYAfW8nNDV85TyVgWlldNcgdv7nn1Sq8g HwB2BHdIAkYce3hEoDQXt/mKlgEGsLpzJcnLKimtPXQQy9TxUaLBe9PInPd+Ohix0XOlY+Uk QFEx50Ki3rSDl2Zt2tnkNYKUCvTJq7jvOlaPd6d/W0tZqpyy7KVay+K4aMobDsodB3dvEAs6 ScCnh03dDAFgIq5nsB11j3KPKdVoPlfucX2c7kGNH+LUMbzqV6beIENfNexkOfxHfw==
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 07:34:04 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 26.11.24 18:28, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 03:10:04PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
diff --git a/tools/include/xen-barrier.h b/tools/include/xen-barrier.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..62036f528b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/include/xen-barrier.h
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/******************************************************************************
+ * xen-barrier.h
+ *
+ * Definition of CPU barriers, part of libxenctrl.

Does it needs to be part of "libxenctrl" ? :-) Since the goal is to be
able to use the header without xenctrl.

Yeah, but it was part of libxenctrl until now.

So it needs to be distributed together with xenctrl.h, otherwise we'd
need another distribution unit libxenctrl has to depend on.

+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2003-2004, K A Fraser.

I'm not sure this copyright line is enough, looking at `git blame`.

Keir introduce xen_barrier macro in 2012, in
8d3f757328e1 ("libxc: Update rmb/wmb for x86.")
Stefano introduced the Arm macro in 2012, in daa314fe1938 ("arm: compile
libxc"), and Ian in 2013 in ae4b6f29a983 ("tools: libxc: arm64
support").
There's been a modification by Andrew in 2020, so Citrix copyright,
in de16a8fa0db7 ("x86: Use LOCK ADD instead of MFENCE for smp_mb()").

So overall, we probably want:
Copyright (C) 2003-2012, K A Fraser.
Copyright (C) 2012-2020 Citrix Systems, Inc.

Hmm, I just copied the Copyright from xenctrl.h, where I took the contents
of the new header from.

I can see a reason for adding the Copyright for Citrix, but IMHO this
_should_ have happened when the changes were applied in 2020. And I'm feeling
a little bit uneasy to add a Copyright for a company I'm not working for. How
do I really know Citrix is wanting that Copyright to be added?

+ *
+ * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
+ * License as published by the Free Software Foundation;
+ * version 2.1 of the License.
+ *
+ * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+ * Lesser General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
+ * License along with this library; If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#ifndef XENBARRIER_H
+#define XENBARRIER_H

With an extra '_' for the '-' in the header filename?
     XEN_BARRIER_H

Okay.

Otherwise, the rest of the patch looks fine to me, even without the rest
of the series.

Thanks,


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.