[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] xen/bitops: Fix break with in a for_each_set_bit() loop


  • To: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:59:37 +0000
  • Autocrypt: addr=andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsFNBFLhNn8BEADVhE+Hb8i0GV6mihnnr/uiQQdPF8kUoFzCOPXkf7jQ5sLYeJa0cQi6Penp VtiFYznTairnVsN5J+ujSTIb+OlMSJUWV4opS7WVNnxHbFTPYZVQ3erv7NKc2iVizCRZ2Kxn srM1oPXWRic8BIAdYOKOloF2300SL/bIpeD+x7h3w9B/qez7nOin5NzkxgFoaUeIal12pXSR Q354FKFoy6Vh96gc4VRqte3jw8mPuJQpfws+Pb+swvSf/i1q1+1I4jsRQQh2m6OTADHIqg2E ofTYAEh7R5HfPx0EXoEDMdRjOeKn8+vvkAwhviWXTHlG3R1QkbE5M/oywnZ83udJmi+lxjJ5 YhQ5IzomvJ16H0Bq+TLyVLO/VRksp1VR9HxCzItLNCS8PdpYYz5TC204ViycobYU65WMpzWe LFAGn8jSS25XIpqv0Y9k87dLbctKKA14Ifw2kq5OIVu2FuX+3i446JOa2vpCI9GcjCzi3oHV e00bzYiHMIl0FICrNJU0Kjho8pdo0m2uxkn6SYEpogAy9pnatUlO+erL4LqFUO7GXSdBRbw5 gNt25XTLdSFuZtMxkY3tq8MFss5QnjhehCVPEpE6y9ZjI4XB8ad1G4oBHVGK5LMsvg22PfMJ ISWFSHoF/B5+lHkCKWkFxZ0gZn33ju5n6/FOdEx4B8cMJt+cWwARAQABzSlBbmRyZXcgQ29v cGVyIDxhbmRyZXcuY29vcGVyM0BjaXRyaXguY29tPsLBegQTAQgAJAIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkI CwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCWKD95wIZAQAKCRBlw/kGpdefoHbdD/9AIoR3k6fKl+RFiFpyAhvO 59ttDFI7nIAnlYngev2XUR3acFElJATHSDO0ju+hqWqAb8kVijXLops0gOfqt3VPZq9cuHlh IMDquatGLzAadfFx2eQYIYT+FYuMoPZy/aTUazmJIDVxP7L383grjIkn+7tAv+qeDfE+txL4 SAm1UHNvmdfgL2/lcmL3xRh7sub3nJilM93RWX1Pe5LBSDXO45uzCGEdst6uSlzYR/MEr+5Z JQQ32JV64zwvf/aKaagSQSQMYNX9JFgfZ3TKWC1KJQbX5ssoX/5hNLqxMcZV3TN7kU8I3kjK mPec9+1nECOjjJSO/h4P0sBZyIUGfguwzhEeGf4sMCuSEM4xjCnwiBwftR17sr0spYcOpqET ZGcAmyYcNjy6CYadNCnfR40vhhWuCfNCBzWnUW0lFoo12wb0YnzoOLjvfD6OL3JjIUJNOmJy RCsJ5IA/Iz33RhSVRmROu+TztwuThClw63g7+hoyewv7BemKyuU6FTVhjjW+XUWmS/FzknSi dAG+insr0746cTPpSkGl3KAXeWDGJzve7/SBBfyznWCMGaf8E2P1oOdIZRxHgWj0zNr1+ooF /PzgLPiCI4OMUttTlEKChgbUTQ+5o0P080JojqfXwbPAyumbaYcQNiH1/xYbJdOFSiBv9rpt TQTBLzDKXok86M7BTQRS4TZ/ARAAkgqudHsp+hd82UVkvgnlqZjzz2vyrYfz7bkPtXaGb9H4 Rfo7mQsEQavEBdWWjbga6eMnDqtu+FC+qeTGYebToxEyp2lKDSoAsvt8w82tIlP/EbmRbDVn 7bhjBlfRcFjVYw8uVDPptT0TV47vpoCVkTwcyb6OltJrvg/QzV9f07DJswuda1JH3/qvYu0p vjPnYvCq4NsqY2XSdAJ02HrdYPFtNyPEntu1n1KK+gJrstjtw7KsZ4ygXYrsm/oCBiVW/OgU g/XIlGErkrxe4vQvJyVwg6YH653YTX5hLLUEL1NS4TCo47RP+wi6y+TnuAL36UtK/uFyEuPy wwrDVcC4cIFhYSfsO0BumEI65yu7a8aHbGfq2lW251UcoU48Z27ZUUZd2Dr6O/n8poQHbaTd 6bJJSjzGGHZVbRP9UQ3lkmkmc0+XCHmj5WhwNNYjgbbmML7y0fsJT5RgvefAIFfHBg7fTY/i kBEimoUsTEQz+N4hbKwo1hULfVxDJStE4sbPhjbsPCrlXf6W9CxSyQ0qmZ2bXsLQYRj2xqd1 bpA+1o1j2N4/au1R/uSiUFjewJdT/LX1EklKDcQwpk06Af/N7VZtSfEJeRV04unbsKVXWZAk uAJyDDKN99ziC0Wz5kcPyVD1HNf8bgaqGDzrv3TfYjwqayRFcMf7xJaL9xXedMcAEQEAAcLB XwQYAQgACQUCUuE2fwIbDAAKCRBlw/kGpdefoG4XEACD1Qf/er8EA7g23HMxYWd3FXHThrVQ HgiGdk5Yh632vjOm9L4sd/GCEACVQKjsu98e8o3ysitFlznEns5EAAXEbITrgKWXDDUWGYxd pnjj2u+GkVdsOAGk0kxczX6s+VRBhpbBI2PWnOsRJgU2n10PZ3mZD4Xu9kU2IXYmuW+e5KCA vTArRUdCrAtIa1k01sPipPPw6dfxx2e5asy21YOytzxuWFfJTGnVxZZSCyLUO83sh6OZhJkk b9rxL9wPmpN/t2IPaEKoAc0FTQZS36wAMOXkBh24PQ9gaLJvfPKpNzGD8XWR5HHF0NLIJhgg 4ZlEXQ2fVp3XrtocHqhu4UZR4koCijgB8sB7Tb0GCpwK+C4UePdFLfhKyRdSXuvY3AHJd4CP 4JzW0Bzq/WXY3XMOzUTYApGQpnUpdOmuQSfpV9MQO+/jo7r6yPbxT7CwRS5dcQPzUiuHLK9i nvjREdh84qycnx0/6dDroYhp0DFv4udxuAvt1h4wGwTPRQZerSm4xaYegEFusyhbZrI0U9tJ B8WrhBLXDiYlyJT6zOV2yZFuW47VrLsjYnHwn27hmxTC/7tvG3euCklmkn9Sl9IAKFu29RSo d5bD8kMSCYsTqtTfT6W4A3qHGvIDta3ptLYpIAOD2sY3GYq2nf3Bbzx81wZK14JdDDHUX2Rs 6+ahAA==
  • Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:59:48 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 21/11/2024 3:19 pm, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 2:50 PM Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>> for_each_set_bit()'s use of a double for loop had an accidental bug with a
>> break in the inner loop leading to an infinite outer loop.
>>
>> Adjust for_each_set_bit() to avoid this behaviour, and add extend
>> test_for_each_set_bit() with a test case for this.
>>
>> Fixes: ed26376f20bf ("xen/bitops: Introduce for_each_set_bit()")
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Both GCC and Clang seem happy with this, even at -O1:
>>
>>   https://godbolt.org/z/o6ohjrzsY
>> ---
>>  xen/common/bitops.c      | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  xen/include/xen/bitops.h |  2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/common/bitops.c b/xen/common/bitops.c
>> index 91ae961440af..0edd62d25c28 100644
>> --- a/xen/common/bitops.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/bitops.c
>> @@ -110,6 +110,22 @@ static void __init test_for_each_set_bit(void)
>>
>>      if ( ull != ull_res )
>>          panic("for_each_set_bit(uint64) expected %#"PRIx64", got 
>> %#"PRIx64"\n", ull, ull_res);
>> +
>> +    /* Check that we break from the middle of the loop */
>> +    ui = HIDE(0x80001008U);
>> +    ui_res = 0;
>> +    for_each_set_bit ( i, ui )
>> +    {
>> +        static __initdata unsigned int count;
>> +
>> +        if ( count++ > 1 )
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        ui_res |= 1U << i;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if ( ui_res != 0x1008 )
>> +        panic("for_each_set_bit(break) expected 0x1008, got %#x\n", ui_res);
>>  }
>>
>>  static void __init test_multiple_bits_set(void)
>> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/bitops.h b/xen/include/xen/bitops.h
>> index 79615fb89d04..448b2d3e0937 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/bitops.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/bitops.h
>> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static always_inline attr_const unsigned int 
>> fls64(uint64_t x)
>>   * A copy of @val is taken internally.
>>   */
>>  #define for_each_set_bit(iter, val)                     \
>> -    for ( typeof(val) __v = (val); __v; )               \
>> +    for ( typeof(val) __v = (val); __v; __v = 0 )       \
>>          for ( unsigned int (iter);                      \
>>                __v && ((iter) = ffs_g(__v) - 1, true);   \
>>                __v &= __v - 1 )
>>
>> base-commit: e0058760a0c7935ad0690d8b9babb9050eceedf0
> Not a fun of static variables but it's just in the test,

Oh, I guess I can do it with just a local variable.  Incremental diff is:

@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static void __init test_fls(void)
 
 static void __init test_for_each_set_bit(void)
 {
-    unsigned int  ui,  ui_res = 0;
+    unsigned int  ui,  ui_res = 0, tmp;
     unsigned long ul,  ul_res = 0;
     uint64_t      ull, ull_res = 0;
 
@@ -113,12 +113,11 @@ static void __init test_for_each_set_bit(void)
 
     /* Check that we break from the middle of the loop */
     ui = HIDE(0x80001008U);
+    tmp = 0;
     ui_res = 0;
     for_each_set_bit ( i, ui )
     {
-        static __initdata unsigned int count;
-
-        if ( count++ > 1 )
+        if ( tmp++ > 1 )
             break;
 
         ui_res |= 1U << i;


> Reviewed-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.  This turns out to be a whole lot easier than I was fearing.

~Andrew



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.