[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] xen/riscv: introduce setup_mm()


  • To: oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:59:29 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Bob Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@xxxxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:59:32 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 11.11.2024 13:51, oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-11-11 at 11:29 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 08.11.2024 13:51, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>>> @@ -37,9 +42,9 @@ static inline void *maddr_to_virt(paddr_t ma)
>>>   */
>>>  static inline unsigned long virt_to_maddr(unsigned long va)
>>>  {
>>> -    if ((va >= DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START) &&
>>> +    if ((va >= directmap_virt_start) &&
>>
>> Is this a valid / necessary change to make?
> You are right, this not valid change, va value is DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START-
> relative.
> 
>>  Right now there looks to be
>> nothing immediately below the directmap, yet that would need
>> guaranteeing
>> (e.g. by some BUILD_BIG_ON() or whatever else) if code builds upon
>> that.
> It is not really clear how to check that nothing below the directmap is
> present/used. But IIUC there is no need for this check if properly
> correct the condition above.

Right.

>>>          (va < (DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START + DIRECTMAP_SIZE)))
>>> -        return directmapoff_to_maddr(va - DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START);
>>> +        return directmapoff_to_maddr(va - directmap_virt_start);
>>
>> FTAOD - no question about this part of the change.
>>
>>> @@ -423,3 +429,140 @@ void * __init early_fdt_map(paddr_t
>>> fdt_paddr)
>>>  
>>>      return fdt_virt;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +vaddr_t __ro_after_init directmap_virt_start =
>>> DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START;
>>> +
>>> +struct page_info *__ro_after_init frametable_virt_start;
>>
>> As for directmap_virt_start - perhaps better with initializer?
> Do you mean to initialized by NULL or frame_table?

The latter.

> If to initialize by frame_table then the if-condition won't work
> properly in setup_frametable_mappings() ( but I think that this
> condition could be dropped as setup_frametable_mappings() is supposed
> to be called only once ?! ). And you mentioned about this condition
> here ...
> 
>>
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_RISCV_32
>>> +
>>> +/* Map a frame table to cover physical addresses ps through pe */
>>> +static void __init setup_frametable_mappings(paddr_t ps, paddr_t
>>> pe)
>>> +{
>>> +    paddr_t aligned_ps = ROUNDUP(ps, PAGE_SIZE);
>>> +    paddr_t aligned_pe = ROUNDDOWN(pe, PAGE_SIZE);
>>> +    unsigned long nr_mfns = PFN_DOWN(aligned_pe - aligned_ps);
>>> +    unsigned long frametable_size = nr_mfns *
>>> sizeof(*frame_table);
>>> +    mfn_t base_mfn;
>>> +
>>> +    if ( !frametable_virt_start )
>>> +        frametable_virt_start = frame_table -
>>> paddr_to_pfn(aligned_ps);
>>
>> If you make this conditional, then you need an "else" (or something
>> that's
>> effectively one) just like you have in setup_directmap_mappings().
>> Like
>> for the earlier assumption on ps being zero: Assumptions you make on
>> how
>> a function is used want to at least be self-consistent. I.e. here
>> either
>> you assume the function may be called more than once, or you don't.
> ...
> 
> Do we have in Xen something to be sure that the function is called only
> once or I have to come up with static variable inside the function?

There's no checking needed. All I'm asking for is that the function
either be indeed callable multiple times, or that it not wrongly give
the impression that it can be called more than once when it really can't
be.

>>> +    if ( base_mfn < mfn_x(directmap_mfn_start) )
>>> +        panic("can't add directmap mapping at %#lx below directmap
>>> start %#lx\n",
>>> +              base_mfn, mfn_x(directmap_mfn_start));
>>> +
>>> +    if ( map_pages_to_xen((vaddr_t)mfn_to_virt(base_mfn),
>>> +                          _mfn(base_mfn), nr_mfns,
>>> +                          PAGE_HYPERVISOR_RW) )
>>> +        panic("Directmap mappings for [%#"PRIpaddr", %#"PRIpaddr")
>>> failed\n",
>>> +              mfn_to_maddr(_mfn(base_mfn)),
>>> +              mfn_to_maddr(_mfn(base_mfn + nr_mfns)));
>>
>> Maybe worth also logging the error code?
> I am not really understand why do we need that as the use will see what
> is the issue in the message inside panic().

If the panic() triggers, the user will see that something went wrong with
the given range. The error code may give a hint at _what_ went wrong.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.