Re: [PATCH 00/12] Boot modules for Hyperlaunch

["Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/4/24 03:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.11.2024 18:25, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> > The Boot Modules for Hyperlaunch series is an effort to split out preliminary
> > changes necessary for the introduction of the Hyperlaunch domain builder
> > logic. These preliminary changes revolve around introducing the struct
> > boot_module and struct boot_domain structures. This includes converting the
> > dom0 construction path to use these structures. These abstractions lay the
> > groundwork to transform and extend the dom0 construction logic into a limited,
> > but general domain builder.
> >
> > The splitting of Hyperlaunch into a set of series are twofold, to reduce the
> > effort in reviewing a much larger series, and to reduce the effort in handling
> > the knock-on effects to the construction logic from requested review changes.
> >
> > Much thanks to AMD for supporting this work.
> >
> > !!NOTE on v8!!
> > For this version a complete re-organization of the changes were made with the
> > concept that three tasks were being carried out that were intertwined in the 
> > past
> > versions. These three tasks were 1. capturing the state tracking and
> > enrichment, 2. removing the use of module_t to track where a boot module is
> > located in memory, and 3. abstract the domain construction state. The first
> > eight patches address task 1, task 2 is address with patch nine, and the
> > remaining addresses task 3.
> Just to mention it - a v8 tag would also have been nice in the mail thread
> subjects.
Absolutely, my apologies, I totally missed that I hadn't tagged the series.

v/r,
dps