[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] xen: Remove dependency between pciback and privcmd
- To: "Chen, Jiqian" <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 12:10:14 +0200
- Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:10:23 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 11.10.2024 11:33, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/10/11 17:20, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/10/11 16:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 11.10.2024 05:42, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>>> @@ -1757,11 +1756,19 @@ static int __init xen_pcibk_init(void)
>>>> bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, &pci_stub_nb);
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_ACPI
>>>> + xen_acpi_register_get_gsi_func(pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> return err;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void __exit xen_pcibk_cleanup(void)
>>>> {
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_ACPI
>>>> + xen_acpi_register_get_gsi_func(NULL);
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> Just wondering - instead of these two #ifdef-s, ...
>>>
>>>> --- a/include/xen/acpi.h
>>>> +++ b/include/xen/acpi.h
>>>> @@ -91,13 +91,9 @@ static inline int xen_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct pci_dev
>>>> *dev,
>>>> }
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PCI_STUB
>>>> -int pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf(unsigned int sbdf);
>>>> -#else
>>>> -static inline int pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf(unsigned int sbdf)
>>>> -{
>>>> - return -1;
>>>> -}
>>>> -#endif
>>>> +typedef int (*get_gsi_from_sbdf_t)(u32 sbdf);
>>>> +
>>>> +void xen_acpi_register_get_gsi_func(get_gsi_from_sbdf_t func);
>>>> +int xen_acpi_get_gsi_from_sbdf(u32 sbdf);
>>>
>>> ... wouldn't a static inline stub (for the !XEN_ACPI case) aid overall
>>> readability?
>> I'm not sure if other files do this. But for me, it feels a little strange
>> to use "#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_ACPI #else" in apci.h, like self-containment.
>> And "#include apci.h" in pic_stub.c is also wraped with CONFIG_XEN_ACPI.
> OK, I saw other files also do this.
> If you insist, I will make modifications in the next version.
Well, I'm not a maintainer of this code, so I can't very well insist.
Jan
|
