[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] xen: Remove dependency between pciback and privcmd
- To: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 10:17:42 +0200
- Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 08:17:53 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 10.10.2024 09:58, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> --- a/drivers/xen/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/acpi.c
> @@ -125,3 +125,20 @@ int xen_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct pci_dev *dev,
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_acpi_get_gsi_info);
> +
> +get_gsi_from_sbdf_t get_gsi_from_sbdf = NULL;
> +
> +void xen_acpi_register_get_gsi_func(get_gsi_from_sbdf_t func)
> +{
> + get_gsi_from_sbdf = func;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_acpi_register_get_gsi_func);
> +
> +int xen_acpi_get_gsi_from_sbdf(u32 sbdf)
> +{
> + if (get_gsi_from_sbdf)
> + return get_gsi_from_sbdf(sbdf);
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
Perhaps better -EOPNOTSUPP?
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_acpi_get_gsi_from_sbdf);
> \ No newline at end of file
Can you please take care of this as well while touching the file? Or
maybe you are doing so, but the diff doesn't show it properly?
> @@ -484,6 +483,7 @@ static int pcistub_init_device(struct pcistub_device
> *psdev)
> if (err)
> goto config_release;
> psdev->gsi = gsi;
> + xen_acpi_register_get_gsi_func(pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf);
> }
> #endif
Why here rather than directly in xen_pcibk_init()? And why no change to
xen_pcibk_cleanup() to remove the hook again on unload? Which will then
raise the question of possible race conditions.
Jan
|