[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] xen: move per-cpu area management into common code


  • To: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 10:43:45 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsFNBFLhNn8BEADVhE+Hb8i0GV6mihnnr/uiQQdPF8kUoFzCOPXkf7jQ5sLYeJa0cQi6Penp VtiFYznTairnVsN5J+ujSTIb+OlMSJUWV4opS7WVNnxHbFTPYZVQ3erv7NKc2iVizCRZ2Kxn srM1oPXWRic8BIAdYOKOloF2300SL/bIpeD+x7h3w9B/qez7nOin5NzkxgFoaUeIal12pXSR Q354FKFoy6Vh96gc4VRqte3jw8mPuJQpfws+Pb+swvSf/i1q1+1I4jsRQQh2m6OTADHIqg2E ofTYAEh7R5HfPx0EXoEDMdRjOeKn8+vvkAwhviWXTHlG3R1QkbE5M/oywnZ83udJmi+lxjJ5 YhQ5IzomvJ16H0Bq+TLyVLO/VRksp1VR9HxCzItLNCS8PdpYYz5TC204ViycobYU65WMpzWe LFAGn8jSS25XIpqv0Y9k87dLbctKKA14Ifw2kq5OIVu2FuX+3i446JOa2vpCI9GcjCzi3oHV e00bzYiHMIl0FICrNJU0Kjho8pdo0m2uxkn6SYEpogAy9pnatUlO+erL4LqFUO7GXSdBRbw5 gNt25XTLdSFuZtMxkY3tq8MFss5QnjhehCVPEpE6y9ZjI4XB8ad1G4oBHVGK5LMsvg22PfMJ ISWFSHoF/B5+lHkCKWkFxZ0gZn33ju5n6/FOdEx4B8cMJt+cWwARAQABzSlBbmRyZXcgQ29v cGVyIDxhbmRyZXcuY29vcGVyM0BjaXRyaXguY29tPsLBegQTAQgAJAIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkI CwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCWKD95wIZAQAKCRBlw/kGpdefoHbdD/9AIoR3k6fKl+RFiFpyAhvO 59ttDFI7nIAnlYngev2XUR3acFElJATHSDO0ju+hqWqAb8kVijXLops0gOfqt3VPZq9cuHlh IMDquatGLzAadfFx2eQYIYT+FYuMoPZy/aTUazmJIDVxP7L383grjIkn+7tAv+qeDfE+txL4 SAm1UHNvmdfgL2/lcmL3xRh7sub3nJilM93RWX1Pe5LBSDXO45uzCGEdst6uSlzYR/MEr+5Z JQQ32JV64zwvf/aKaagSQSQMYNX9JFgfZ3TKWC1KJQbX5ssoX/5hNLqxMcZV3TN7kU8I3kjK mPec9+1nECOjjJSO/h4P0sBZyIUGfguwzhEeGf4sMCuSEM4xjCnwiBwftR17sr0spYcOpqET ZGcAmyYcNjy6CYadNCnfR40vhhWuCfNCBzWnUW0lFoo12wb0YnzoOLjvfD6OL3JjIUJNOmJy RCsJ5IA/Iz33RhSVRmROu+TztwuThClw63g7+hoyewv7BemKyuU6FTVhjjW+XUWmS/FzknSi dAG+insr0746cTPpSkGl3KAXeWDGJzve7/SBBfyznWCMGaf8E2P1oOdIZRxHgWj0zNr1+ooF /PzgLPiCI4OMUttTlEKChgbUTQ+5o0P080JojqfXwbPAyumbaYcQNiH1/xYbJdOFSiBv9rpt TQTBLzDKXok86M7BTQRS4TZ/ARAAkgqudHsp+hd82UVkvgnlqZjzz2vyrYfz7bkPtXaGb9H4 Rfo7mQsEQavEBdWWjbga6eMnDqtu+FC+qeTGYebToxEyp2lKDSoAsvt8w82tIlP/EbmRbDVn 7bhjBlfRcFjVYw8uVDPptT0TV47vpoCVkTwcyb6OltJrvg/QzV9f07DJswuda1JH3/qvYu0p vjPnYvCq4NsqY2XSdAJ02HrdYPFtNyPEntu1n1KK+gJrstjtw7KsZ4ygXYrsm/oCBiVW/OgU g/XIlGErkrxe4vQvJyVwg6YH653YTX5hLLUEL1NS4TCo47RP+wi6y+TnuAL36UtK/uFyEuPy wwrDVcC4cIFhYSfsO0BumEI65yu7a8aHbGfq2lW251UcoU48Z27ZUUZd2Dr6O/n8poQHbaTd 6bJJSjzGGHZVbRP9UQ3lkmkmc0+XCHmj5WhwNNYjgbbmML7y0fsJT5RgvefAIFfHBg7fTY/i kBEimoUsTEQz+N4hbKwo1hULfVxDJStE4sbPhjbsPCrlXf6W9CxSyQ0qmZ2bXsLQYRj2xqd1 bpA+1o1j2N4/au1R/uSiUFjewJdT/LX1EklKDcQwpk06Af/N7VZtSfEJeRV04unbsKVXWZAk uAJyDDKN99ziC0Wz5kcPyVD1HNf8bgaqGDzrv3TfYjwqayRFcMf7xJaL9xXedMcAEQEAAcLB XwQYAQgACQUCUuE2fwIbDAAKCRBlw/kGpdefoG4XEACD1Qf/er8EA7g23HMxYWd3FXHThrVQ HgiGdk5Yh632vjOm9L4sd/GCEACVQKjsu98e8o3ysitFlznEns5EAAXEbITrgKWXDDUWGYxd pnjj2u+GkVdsOAGk0kxczX6s+VRBhpbBI2PWnOsRJgU2n10PZ3mZD4Xu9kU2IXYmuW+e5KCA vTArRUdCrAtIa1k01sPipPPw6dfxx2e5asy21YOytzxuWFfJTGnVxZZSCyLUO83sh6OZhJkk b9rxL9wPmpN/t2IPaEKoAc0FTQZS36wAMOXkBh24PQ9gaLJvfPKpNzGD8XWR5HHF0NLIJhgg 4ZlEXQ2fVp3XrtocHqhu4UZR4koCijgB8sB7Tb0GCpwK+C4UePdFLfhKyRdSXuvY3AHJd4CP 4JzW0Bzq/WXY3XMOzUTYApGQpnUpdOmuQSfpV9MQO+/jo7r6yPbxT7CwRS5dcQPzUiuHLK9i nvjREdh84qycnx0/6dDroYhp0DFv4udxuAvt1h4wGwTPRQZerSm4xaYegEFusyhbZrI0U9tJ B8WrhBLXDiYlyJT6zOV2yZFuW47VrLsjYnHwn27hmxTC/7tvG3euCklmkn9Sl9IAKFu29RSo d5bD8kMSCYsTqtTfT6W4A3qHGvIDta3ptLYpIAOD2sY3GYq2nf3Bbzx81wZK14JdDDHUX2Rs 6+ahAA==
  • Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Bob Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@xxxxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:43:59 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 22/09/2024 10:23 am, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 19/09/2024 17:59, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/percpu.c b/xen/arch/x86/percpu.c
>> index 3205eacea6..33bded8cac 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/percpu.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/percpu.c
>> @@ -1,79 +1,19 @@
>> -#include <xen/percpu.h>
>>   #include <xen/cpu.h>
>> -#include <xen/init.h>
>> -#include <xen/mm.h>
>> -#include <xen/rcupdate.h>
>> -
>> -unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS];
>> -
>> -/*
>> - * Force uses of per_cpu() with an invalid area to attempt to access
>> the
>> - * middle of the non-canonical address space resulting in a #GP,
>> rather than a
>> - * possible #PF at (NULL + a little) which has security implications
>> in the
>> - * context of PV guests.
>> - */
>> -#define INVALID_PERCPU_AREA (0x8000000000000000UL - (unsigned
>> long)__per_cpu_start)
>> -#define PERCPU_ORDER get_order_from_bytes(__per_cpu_data_end -
>> __per_cpu_start)
>> -
>> -void __init percpu_init_areas(void)
>> -{
>> -    unsigned int cpu;
>> -
>> -    for ( cpu = 1; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++ )
>> -        __per_cpu_offset[cpu] = INVALID_PERCPU_AREA;
>> -}
>> +#include <xen/percpu.h>
>> +#include <xen/smp.h>
>>   -static int init_percpu_area(unsigned int cpu)
>> +int arch_percpu_area_init_status(void)
>
> I understand that Arm and x86 are returning a different value today.
> But now that we are provising a common implementation, I think we need
> to explain the difference. This is probably a question for the x86 folks.

The declarations for CPU Parking (variable, or compile time false) wants
to be in the new common header, at which point
arch_percpu_area_init_status() doesn't need to exist.

That also makes it very clear that there's a difference in return value
based on CPU Parking (and the comment beside the variable explains this
is about not quite offlining CPUs), which is far clearer than some arch
function.

>> diff --git a/xen/common/percpu.c b/xen/common/percpu.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..3837ef5714
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/common/percpu.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +#include <xen/percpu.h>
>> +#include <xen/cpu.h>
>> +#include <xen/init.h>
>> +#include <xen/mm.h>
>> +#include <xen/rcupdate.h>
>> +
>> +unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS];

unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS] = {
    [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = INVALID_PERCPU_AREA,
};

should work, removing the need for percpu_init_areas() and avoids a
window during boot where all CPUs "share" a percpu area.

~Andrew



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.