[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] xen/arm: mpu: Implement a dummy enable_secondary_cpu_mm
Hi,
On 18/09/2024 19:51, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Secondary cpus initialization is not yet supported. Thus, we print an
appropriate message and put the secondary cpus in WFE state.
Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx>
---
Changes from :-
v1 - 1. NR_CPUS is defined as 1 for MPU
2. Added a message in enable_secondary_cpu_mm()
xen/arch/Kconfig | 1 +
xen/arch/arm/arm64/mpu/head.S | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/Kconfig b/xen/arch/Kconfig
index 308ce129a8..8640b7ec8b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/arch/Kconfig
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ config NR_CPUS
default "8" if ARM && RCAR3
default "4" if ARM && QEMU
default "4" if ARM && MPSOC
+ default "1" if ARM && MPU
default "128" if ARM
help
Controls the build-time size of various arrays and bitmaps
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/mpu/head.S b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/mpu/head.S
index ef55c8765c..3dfbbf8879 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/mpu/head.S
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/mpu/head.S
@@ -168,6 +168,16 @@ FUNC(enable_boot_cpu_mm)
b 1b
END(enable_boot_cpu_mm)
+/*
+ * Secondary cpu has not yet been supported on MPU systems. We will block the
+ * secondary cpu bringup at this stage.
Given that NR_CPUS is 1, this should not be reachable. How about the
following comment:
"We don't yet support secondary CPUs bring-up. Implement a dummy helper
to please the common code."
+ */
+ENTRY(enable_secondary_cpu_mm)
+1: PRINT("- SMP not enabled yet -\r\n")
You want the print to be outside of the loop. Otherwise, it will spam
the console in the unlikely case the code is reached.
+ wfe
+ b 1b
+ENDPROC(enable_secondary_cpu_mm)
+
/*
* Local variables:
* mode: ASM
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
|