[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] xen: add capability to remap non-RAM pages to different PFNs


  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:59:25 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jgross@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsBNBFOMcBYBCACgGjqjoGvbEouQZw/ToiBg9W98AlM2QHV+iNHsEs7kxWhKMjrioyspZKOB ycWxw3ie3j9uvg9EOB3aN4xiTv4qbnGiTr3oJhkB1gsb6ToJQZ8uxGq2kaV2KL9650I1SJve dYm8Of8Zd621lSmoKOwlNClALZNew72NjJLEzTalU1OdT7/i1TXkH09XSSI8mEQ/ouNcMvIJ NwQpd369y9bfIhWUiVXEK7MlRgUG6MvIj6Y3Am/BBLUVbDa4+gmzDC9ezlZkTZG2t14zWPvx XP3FAp2pkW0xqG7/377qptDmrk42GlSKN4z76ELnLxussxc7I2hx18NUcbP8+uty4bMxABEB AAHNH0p1ZXJnZW4gR3Jvc3MgPGpncm9zc0BzdXNlLmNvbT7CwHkEEwECACMFAlOMcK8CGwMH CwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCw3p3WKL8TL8eZB/9G0juS/kDY9LhEXseh mE9U+iA1VsLhgDqVbsOtZ/S14LRFHczNd/Lqkn7souCSoyWsBs3/wO+OjPvxf7m+Ef+sMtr0 G5lCWEWa9wa0IXx5HRPW/ScL+e4AVUbL7rurYMfwCzco+7TfjhMEOkC+va5gzi1KrErgNRHH kg3PhlnRY0Udyqx++UYkAsN4TQuEhNN32MvN0Np3WlBJOgKcuXpIElmMM5f1BBzJSKBkW0Jc Wy3h2Wy912vHKpPV/Xv7ZwVJ27v7KcuZcErtptDevAljxJtE7aJG6WiBzm+v9EswyWxwMCIO RoVBYuiocc51872tRGywc03xaQydB+9R7BHPzsBNBFOMcBYBCADLMfoA44MwGOB9YT1V4KCy vAfd7E0BTfaAurbG+Olacciz3yd09QOmejFZC6AnoykydyvTFLAWYcSCdISMr88COmmCbJzn sHAogjexXiif6ANUUlHpjxlHCCcELmZUzomNDnEOTxZFeWMTFF9Rf2k2F0Tl4E5kmsNGgtSa aMO0rNZoOEiD/7UfPP3dfh8JCQ1VtUUsQtT1sxos8Eb/HmriJhnaTZ7Hp3jtgTVkV0ybpgFg w6WMaRkrBh17mV0z2ajjmabB7SJxcouSkR0hcpNl4oM74d2/VqoW4BxxxOD1FcNCObCELfIS auZx+XT6s+CE7Qi/c44ibBMR7hyjdzWbABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlOMcBYCGwwACgkQsN6d 1ii/Ey9D+Af/WFr3q+bg/8v5tCknCtn92d5lyYTBNt7xgWzDZX8G6/pngzKyWfedArllp0Pn fgIXtMNV+3t8Li1Tg843EXkP7+2+CQ98MB8XvvPLYAfW8nNDV85TyVgWlldNcgdv7nn1Sq8g HwB2BHdIAkYce3hEoDQXt/mKlgEGsLpzJcnLKimtPXQQy9TxUaLBe9PInPd+Ohix0XOlY+Uk QFEx50Ki3rSDl2Zt2tnkNYKUCvTJq7jvOlaPd6d/W0tZqpyy7KVay+K4aMobDsodB3dvEAs6 ScCnh03dDAFgIq5nsB11j3KPKdVoPlfucX2c7kGNH+LUMbzqV6beIENfNexkOfxHfw==
  • Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 07:59:35 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 20.08.24 11:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.08.2024 10:20, Juergen Gross wrote:
When running as a Xen PV dom0 it can happen that the kernel is being
loaded to a guest physical address conflicting with the host memory
map.

In order to be able to resolve this conflict, add the capability to
remap non-RAM areas to different guest PFNs. A function to use this
remapping information for other purposes than doing the remap will be
added when needed.

As the number of conflicts should be rather low (currently only
machines with max. 1 conflict are known), save the remap data in a
small statically allocated array.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
---
V2:
- split off from patch 5 of V1 of the series
- moved to p2m.c
---
  arch/x86/xen/p2m.c     | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h |  3 ++
  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
index 7c735b730acd..bb55e0fe1a04 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
  #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
  #include <xen/balloon.h>
  #include <xen/grant_table.h>
+#include <xen/hvc-console.h>
#include "xen-ops.h" @@ -792,6 +793,70 @@ int clear_foreign_p2m_mapping(struct gnttab_unmap_grant_ref *unmap_ops,
        return ret;
  }
+/* Remapped non-RAM areas */
+#define NR_NONRAM_REMAP 4
+static struct nonram_remap {
+       phys_addr_t maddr;
+       phys_addr_t paddr;
+       unsigned long size;

size_t?

Fine with me.


+} xen_nonram_remap[NR_NONRAM_REMAP];
+static unsigned int nr_nonram_remap;

Both __initdata? Or, considering patch 6, at least __ro_after_init?

__ro_after_init should be fine.


+/*
+ * Do the real remapping of non-RAM regions as specified in the
+ * xen_nonram_remap[] array.
+ * In case of an error just crash the system.
+ */
+void __init xen_do_remap_nonram(void)
+{
+       unsigned int i;
+       unsigned int remapped = 0;
+       struct nonram_remap *remap = xen_nonram_remap;
+       unsigned long pfn, mfn, len;
+
+       if (!nr_nonram_remap)
+               return;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < nr_nonram_remap; i++) {
+               pfn = PFN_DOWN(remap->paddr);
+               mfn = PFN_DOWN(remap->maddr);
+               for (len = 0; len < remap->size; len += PAGE_SIZE) {
+                       if (!set_phys_to_machine(pfn, mfn)) {
+                               pr_err("Failed to set p2m mapping for pfn=%ld 
mfn=%ld\n",

I'm not convinced that frame numbers logged in decimal are overly useful.

I agree. Will switch to hex.


+                                      pfn, mfn);
+                               BUG();
+                       }
+
+                       pfn++;
+                       mfn++;
+                       remapped++;
+               }
+
+               remap++;
+       }
+
+       pr_info("Remapped %u non-RAM page(s)\n", remapped);

This message may be useful in a log also when nothing was remapped - maybe
drop the initial if()?

Fine with me.


+}
+
+/*
+ * Add a new non-RAM remap entry.
+ * In case of no free entry found, just crash the system.
+ */
+void __init xen_add_remap_nonram(phys_addr_t maddr, phys_addr_t paddr,
+                                unsigned long size)
+{
+       if (nr_nonram_remap == NR_NONRAM_REMAP) {
+               xen_raw_console_write("Number of required E820 entry remapping 
actions exceed maximum value\n");
+               BUG();
+       }
+
+       xen_nonram_remap[nr_nonram_remap].maddr = maddr;
+       xen_nonram_remap[nr_nonram_remap].paddr = paddr;
+       xen_nonram_remap[nr_nonram_remap].size = size;
+
+       nr_nonram_remap++;
+}

You don't enforce any constraints on the addresses / size here. With
this the loop in xen_do_remap_nonram() may terminate too early if non-
page-aligned values were passed into here. Both addresses not having
the same offset-into-page may also end up anomalous. Might be worth
switching to frame numbers / number-of-pages for the tracking struct.

Hmm, I'd like to at least WARN() in case someone tries to access a remapped
area out of bounds, which requires to keep the original non-page-aligned
values.

I'll fix the xen_do_remap_nonram() loop.


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.