[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[XEN PATCH v14 2/5] x86/pvh: Allow (un)map_pirq when dom0 is PVH


  • To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 15:04:21 +0800
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0)
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=n9HsRibqBTCMt13S76pOCZKNm1S4OJKlQQcgJQgl9vA=; b=RI8SGTDSgwc8GjVioKIA6ojKpT7bj8UhAFwEdVWrXj1OpOw8ZsrdwnJC5IVpIRLVK/L7eAIDNzubuN7xBUBj6xUyFcDuuXhkHWGRIs8gk7PZDdzHIMCpxli+mgNdnKbCbZ+RgpgkkyK+oKygje5PL3lNEQmfdEEWOB7RSj/LY2Sp4gTuzwBcqyL0A+kxf+xDTDx3+pAhBfL5VeymPrqXnkG3kTVlpd0C8IXHAH0JBnNd5QFGU66pnR77pPPhhhYxV4BfbBZDn1GlR4EFaNy9/x5UxXDpYW7ydbNSkkPPDUCeh5DhyN19pzpr+/jwuIiigXCZbCog2jvVeB3wcAC5IQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MrSKR7mo4H47b+Wq9BPbpz1Zm2kUWwTfWMOTNKZ3Brbr9Fv1JxyDvlpbKQHcRJk9LzHAW2LEF+tSJsCYgs7T0ucq/x3jSQFrIPkqkV8e49Gb/rSehctbpfAJR3089NuWNTRCGsGdxdpiZlYOT5B5D9UjPFQ/dPYqvxS32mbMOZ+sH/egysad1HgucvmfwpqymVAIQDjMcZ7n3e+dAsdkBSboi3wyV4V5POrAE+lqq/c/SyBvlfnPrY5SkqXq6osopBPElyAQAkwZkZJCkifIwe9eEuQX6FglHep3eKSHrrkv5lr1n1LDgopEMQgmfz/uor7YNNPFvc2L5T56yKxzMQ==
  • Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <gwd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Juergen Gross" <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P . Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stewart Hildebrand <Stewart.Hildebrand@xxxxxxx>, Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 07:05:19 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

When dom0 is PVH type and passthrough a device to HVM domU, Qemu code
xen_pt_realize->xc_physdev_map_pirq and libxl code pci_add_dm_done->
xc_physdev_map_pirq map a pirq for passthrough devices.
In xc_physdev_map_pirq call stack, function hvm_physdev_op has a check
has_pirq(currd), but currd is PVH dom0, PVH has no X86_EMU_USE_PIRQ flag,
so it fails, PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq is not allowed for PVH dom0 in current
codes.

But it is fine to map interrupts through pirq to a HVM domain whose
XENFEAT_hvm_pirqs is not enabled. Because pirq field is used as a way to
reference interrupts and it is just the way for the device model to
identify which interrupt should be mapped to which domain, however
has_pirq() is just to check if HVM domains route interrupts from
devices(emulated or passthrough) through event channel, so, the has_pirq()
check should not be applied to the PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq issued by dom0.

So, allow PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq when dom0 is PVH and also allow
PHYSDEVOP_unmap_pirq for the removal device path to unmap pirq. Then the
interrupt of a passthrough device can be successfully mapped to pirq for domU.

Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
---
v13->v14 changes:
Modified the commit message.

v12->v13 changes:
Removed the PHYSDEVOP_(un)map_pirq restriction check for pvh domU and added a 
corresponding description in the commit message.

v11->v12 changes:
Avoid using return, set error code instead when (un)map is not allowed.

v10->v11 changes:
Delete the judgment of "d==currd", so that we can prevent physdev_(un)map_pirq 
from being executed when domU has no pirq, instead of just preventing 
self-mapping.
And modify the description of the commit message accordingly.

v9->v10 changes:
Indent the comments above PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq according to the code style.

v8->v9 changes:
Add a comment above PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq to describe why need this hypercall.
Change "!is_pv_domain(d)" to "is_hvm_domain(d)", and "map.domid == DOMID_SELF" 
to "d == current->domian".

v7->v8 changes:
Add the domid check(domid == DOMID_SELF) to prevent self map when guest doesn't 
use pirq.
That check was missed in the previous version.

v6->v7 changes:
Nothing.

v5->v6 changes:
Nothing.

v4->v5 changes:
Move the check of self map_pirq to physdev.c, and change to check if the caller 
has PIRQ flag, and just break for PHYSDEVOP_(un)map_pirq in hvm_physdev_op.

v3->v4 changes:
add check to prevent PVH self map.

v2->v3 changes:
Du to changes in the implementation of the second patch on kernel side(that it 
will do setup_gsi and map_pirq when assigning a device to passthrough), add 
PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0, and we need to support self mapping.
---
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c
index f023f7879e24..81883c8d4f60 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c
@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ long hvm_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
     {
     case PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq:
     case PHYSDEVOP_unmap_pirq:
+        break;
+
     case PHYSDEVOP_eoi:
     case PHYSDEVOP_irq_status_query:
     case PHYSDEVOP_get_free_pirq:
-- 
2.34.1




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.