|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/vmx: Rewrite vmx_sync_pir_to_irr() to be more efficient
On 27.08.2024 15:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> There are two issues. First, pi_test_and_clear_on() pulls the cache-line to
> the CPU and dirties it even if there's nothing outstanding, but the final
> for_each_set_bit() is O(256) when O(8) would do,
Nit: That's bitmap_for_each() now, I think. And again ...
> and would avoid multiple
> atomic updates to the same IRR word.
>
> Rewrite it from scratch, explaining what's going on at each step.
>
> Bloat-o-meter reports 177 -> 145 (net -32), but the better aspect is the
> removal calls to __find_{first,next}_bit() hidden behind for_each_set_bit().
... here, and no underscore prefixes on the two find functions.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -2317,18 +2317,72 @@ static void cf_check vmx_deliver_posted_intr(struct
> vcpu *v, u8 vector)
>
> static void cf_check vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct vcpu *v)
> {
> - struct vlapic *vlapic = vcpu_vlapic(v);
> - unsigned int group, i;
> - DECLARE_BITMAP(pending_intr, X86_NR_VECTORS);
> + struct pi_desc *desc = &v->arch.hvm.vmx.pi_desc;
> + union {
> + uint64_t _64[X86_NR_VECTORS / (sizeof(uint64_t) * 8)];
Using unsigned long here would imo be better, as that's what matches
struct pi_desc's DECLARE_BITMAP().
> + uint32_t _32[X86_NR_VECTORS / (sizeof(uint32_t) * 8)];
> + } vec;
> + uint32_t *irr;
> + bool on;
>
> - if ( !pi_test_and_clear_on(&v->arch.hvm.vmx.pi_desc) )
> + /*
> + * The PIR is a contended cacheline which bounces between the CPU(s) and
> + * IOMMU(s). An IOMMU updates the entire PIR atomically, but we can't
> + * express the same on the CPU side, so care has to be taken.
> + *
> + * First, do a plain read of ON. If the PIR hasn't been modified, this
> + * will keep the cacheline Shared and not pull it Excusive on the current
> + * CPU.
> + */
> + if ( !pi_test_on(desc) )
> return;
>
> - for ( group = 0; group < ARRAY_SIZE(pending_intr); group++ )
> - pending_intr[group] = pi_get_pir(&v->arch.hvm.vmx.pi_desc, group);
> + /*
> + * Second, if the plain read said that ON was set, we must clear it with
> + * an atomic action. This will bring the cachline to Exclusive on the
Nit (from my spell checker): cacheline.
> + * current CPU.
> + *
> + * This should always succeed because noone else should be playing with
> + * the PIR behind our back, but assert so just in case.
> + */
> + on = pi_test_and_clear_on(desc);
> + ASSERT(on);
> +
> + /*
> + * The cacheline is now Exclusive on the current CPU, and because ON was
"is" is pretty ambitious. We can only hope it (still) is.
> + * set, some other entity (an IOMMU, or Xen on another CPU) has indicated
> + * that at PIR needs re-scanning.
Stray "at"?
> + *
> + * Note: Entities which can't update the entire cacheline atomically
> + * (i.e. Xen on another CPU) are required to update PIR first, then
> + * set ON. Therefore, there is a corner case where we may have
> + * found and processed the PIR updates "last time around" and only
> + * found ON this time around. This is fine; the logic still
> + * operates correctly.
> + *
> + * Atomically read and clear the entire pending bitmap as fast as we, to
Missing "can" before the comma?
> + * reduce the window where another entity may steal the cacheline back
> + * from us. This is a performance concern, not a correctness concern.
> If
> + * the another entity does steal the cacheline back, we'll just wait to
"the other"?
> + * get it back again.
> + */
> + for ( unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vec._64); ++i )
> + vec._64[i] = xchg(&desc->pir[i], 0);
> +
> + /*
> + * Finally, merge the pending vectors into IRR. The IRR register is
> + * scattered in memory, so we have to do this 32 bits at a time.
> + */
> + irr = (uint32_t *)&vcpu_vlapic(v)->regs->data[APIC_IRR];
> + for ( unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vec._32); ++i )
> + {
> + if ( !vec._32[i] )
> + continue;
>
> - bitmap_for_each ( i, pending_intr, X86_NR_VECTORS )
> - vlapic_set_vector(i, &vlapic->regs->data[APIC_IRR]);
> + asm ( "lock or %[val], %[irr]"
> + : [irr] "+m" (irr[i * 0x10])
This wants to be irr * 4 only, to account for sizeof(*irr) == 4.
Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |