Re: Xen Project statistics help

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 16.08.2024 20:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> xen.biterg.io was created by a company called Bitergia. Bitergia was
> later contracted by the Linux Foundation to create a generic dashboard
> for all their Open Source projects. Getting access to the Linux
> Foundation dashboard is the best way to go (if it comes to no cost to
> our project).
> 
> I have used scripts like these in the past to get some data out of a
> release. You can copy/paste the output to an Excel datasheet to do
> further calculations there.
> 
> # List of contributors by name (using the commit "Author" tag) for the
> # 4.19 release. One name per commit.
> git log 4.18.0-rc4...4.19.0-rc4 --format='%aN' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
> 
> # List of reviewers (using the Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags) for the
> # 4.19 release. One name per review.
> git log 4.18.0-rc4...4.19.0-rc4 --pretty=format:%b | grep -E 
> "Reviewed-by|Acked-by" | sed -E 
> 's/.*(Reviewed-by|Acked-by):\s*(.*)\s*<.*/\2/' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Just to mention it: Going by tags here doesn't come anywhere close to the
actual work put into reviewing, even when leaving aside the obvious
difference between small, large but mechanical, and large+intrusive
changes. Imo unlike commit stats, review stats would better be collected
from the mailing list.

Jan