Re: [PATCH] mktarball: only archive Xen

[Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 11:34:53AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.08.2024 11:29, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > As for removing the rule "subtree-force-update-all", I don't think
> > that's a good idea at all. As long as Xen's build systems is cloning
> > subtrees we need to keep the rule. Those subtrees aren't going away
> > anytime soon, especially mini-os for stubdom.
> 
> So you expect people might be using that goal from the command line?
> Fair enough to keep it if so. I simply didn't think a goal with this
> long a name would be intended for manual use.

Well, there's "subtree-force-update" described in `make help`, intended
to be used by developers. The "-all" variate update every subtree
regardless whether they are enable with ./configure or not. I did confuse the
two when replying, so I don't know if "-all" variate is still useful or
not.

-- 

Anthony Perard | Vates XCP-ng Developer

XCP-ng & Xen Orchestra - Vates solutions

web: https://vates.tech