[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [RFC 1/1] swiotlb: Reduce calls to swiotlb_find_pool()
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 04:02:59PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote: > > > Conceptually, it's still being used as a boolean function based on > > > whether the return value is NULL. Renaming it to swiotlb_get_pool() > > > more accurately describes the return value, but obscures the > > > intent of determining if it is a swiotlb buffer. I'll think about it. > > > Suggestions are welcome. > > > > Just keep is_swiotlb_buffer as a trivial inline helper that returns > > bool. > > I don't understand what you are suggesting. Could you elaborate a bit? > is_swiotlb_buffer() can't be trivial when CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC > is set. Call the main function that finds and retuns the pool swiotlb_find_pool, and then have a is_swiotlb_buffer wrapper that just returns bool.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |