|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH v2 for-4.19] automation/eclair: add deviations agreed in MISRA meetings
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024, Federico Serafini wrote:
> Update ECLAIR configuration to take into account the deviations
> agreed during the MISRA meetings.
>
> While doing this, remove the obsolete "Set [123]" comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
release-ack requested
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - keep sync between deviations.ecl and deviations.rst;
> - use 'deliberate' tag for all the deviations of R14.3;
> - do not use the term "project-wide deviation" since it does not add useful
> information.
> ---
> .../eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl | 93 +++++++++++++++++--
> docs/misra/deviations.rst | 81 ++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> index ae2eaf50f7..37cad8bf68 100644
> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
> -### Set 1 ###
> -
> #
> # Series 2.
> #
> @@ -23,6 +21,11 @@ Constant expressions and unreachable branches of if and
> switch statements are ex
> -config=MC3R1.R2.1,reports+={deliberate,
> "any_area(any_loc(any_exp(macro(name(ASSERT_UNREACHABLE||PARSE_ERR_RET||PARSE_ERR||FAIL_MSR||FAIL_CPUID)))))"}
> -doc_end
>
> +-doc_begin="The asm-offset files are not linked deliberately, since they are
> used to generate definitions for asm modules."
> +-file_tag+={asm_offsets,
> "^xen/arch/(arm|x86)/(arm32|arm64|x86_64)/asm-offsets\\.c$"}
> +-config=MC3R1.R2.1,reports+={deliberate,
> "any_area(any_loc(file(asm_offsets)))"}
> +-doc_end
> +
> -doc_begin="Pure declarations (i.e., declarations without initialization) are
> not executable, and therefore it is safe for them to be unreachable."
> -config=MC3R1.R2.1,ignored_stmts+={"any()", "pure_decl()"}
> @@ -63,6 +66,12 @@ they are not instances of commented-out code."
>
> -config=MC3R1.D4.3,reports+={disapplied,"!(any_area(any_loc(file(^xen/arch/arm/arm64/.*$))))"}
> -doc_end
>
> +-doc_begin="The inline asm in 'arm64/lib/bitops.c' is tightly coupled with
> the surronding C code that acts as a wrapper, so it has been decided not to
> add an additional encapsulation layer."
> +-file_tag+={arm64_bitops, "^xen/arch/arm/arm64/lib/bitops\\.c$"}
> +-config=MC3R1.D4.3,reports+={deliberate,
> "all_area(any_loc(file(arm64_bitops)&&any_exp(macro(^(bit|test)op$))))"}
> +-config=MC3R1.D4.3,reports+={deliberate,
> "any_area(any_loc(file(arm64_bitops))&&context(name(int_clear_mask16)))"}
> +-doc_end
> +
> -doc_begin="This header file is autogenerated or empty, therefore it poses no
> risk if included more than once."
> -file_tag+={empty_header, "^xen/arch/arm/efi/runtime\\.h$"}
> @@ -213,10 +222,25 @@ Therefore the absence of prior declarations is safe."
> -config=MC3R1.R8.4,declarations+={safe,
> "loc(file(asm_defns))&&^current_stack_pointer$"}
> -doc_end
>
> +-doc_begin="The function apei_(read|check|clear)_mce are dead code and are
> excluded from non-debug builds, therefore the absence of prior declarations
> is safe."
> +-config=MC3R1.R8.4,declarations+={safe, "^apei_(read|check|clear)_mce\\(.*$"}
> +-doc_end
> +
> -doc_begin="asmlinkage is a marker to indicate that the function is only
> used to interface with asm modules."
> -config=MC3R1.R8.4,declarations+={safe,"loc(text(^(?s).*asmlinkage.*$,
> -1..0))"}
> -doc_end
>
> +-doc_begin="Given that bsearch and sort are defined with the attribute
> 'gnu_inline', it's deliberate not to have a prior declaration.
> +See Section \"6.33.1 Common Function Attributes\" of \"GCC_MANUAL\" for a
> full explanation of gnu_inline."
> +-file_tag+={bsearch_sort, "^xen/include/xen/(sort|lib)\\.h$"}
> +-config=MC3R1.R8.4,reports+={deliberate,
> "any_area(any_loc(file(bsearch_sort))&&decl(name(bsearch||sort)))"}
> +-doc_end
> +
> +-doc_begin="first_valid_mfn is defined in this way because the current lack
> of NUMA support in Arm and PPC requires it."
> +-file_tag+={first_valid_mfn, "^xen/common/page_alloc\\.c$"}
> +-config=MC3R1.R8.4,declarations+={deliberate,"loc(file(first_valid_mfn))"}
> +-doc_end
> +
> -doc_begin="The following variables are compiled in multiple translation
> units
> belonging to different executables and therefore are safe."
> -config=MC3R1.R8.6,declarations+={safe,
> "name(current_stack_pointer||bsearch||sort)"}
> @@ -257,8 +281,6 @@ dimension is higher than omitting the dimension."
> -config=MC3R1.R9.5,reports+={deliberate, "any()"}
> -doc_end
>
> -### Set 2 ###
> -
> #
> # Series 10.
> #
> @@ -299,7 +321,6 @@ integers arguments on two's complement architectures
> -config=MC3R1.R10.1,reports+={safe,
> "any_area(any_loc(any_exp(macro(^ISOLATE_LSB$))))"}
> -doc_end
>
> -### Set 3 ###
> -doc_begin="XEN only supports architectures where signed integers are
> representend using two's complement and all the XEN developers are aware of
> this."
> @@ -323,6 +344,49 @@ constant expressions are required.\""
> # Series 11
> #
>
> +-doc_begin="The conversion from a function pointer to unsigned long or (void
> *) does not lose any information, provided that the target type has enough
> bits to store it."
> +-config=MC3R1.R11.1,casts+={safe,
> + "from(type(canonical(__function_pointer_types)))
> + &&to(type(canonical(builtin(unsigned long)||pointer(builtin(void)))))
> + &&relation(definitely_preserves_value)"
> +}
> +-doc_end
> +
> +-doc_begin="The conversion from a function pointer to a boolean has a
> well-known semantics that do not lead to unexpected behaviour."
> +-config=MC3R1.R11.1,casts+={safe,
> + "from(type(canonical(__function_pointer_types)))
> + &&kind(pointer_to_boolean)"
> +}
> +-doc_end
> +
> +-doc_begin="The conversion from a pointer to an incomplete type to unsigned
> long does not lose any information, provided that the target type has enough
> bits to store it."
> +-config=MC3R1.R11.2,casts+={safe,
> + "from(type(any()))
> + &&to(type(canonical(builtin(unsigned long))))
> + &&relation(definitely_preserves_value)"
> +}
> +-doc_end
> +
> +-doc_begin="Conversions to object pointers that have a pointee type with a
> smaller (i.e., less strict) alignment requirement are safe."
> +-config=MC3R1.R11.3,casts+={safe,
> + "!relation(more_aligned_pointee)"
> +}
> +-doc_end
> +
> +-doc_begin="Conversions from and to integral types are safe, in the
> assumption that the target type has enough bits to store the value.
> +See also Section \"4.7 Arrays and Pointers\" of \"GCC_MANUAL\""
> +-config=MC3R1.R11.6,casts+={safe,
> + "(from(type(canonical(integral())))||to(type(canonical(integral()))))
> + &&relation(definitely_preserves_value)"}
> +-doc_end
> +
> +-doc_begin="The conversion from a pointer to a boolean has a well-known
> semantics that do not lead to unexpected behaviour."
> +-config=MC3R1.R11.6,casts+={safe,
> + "from(type(canonical(__pointer_types)))
> + &&kind(pointer_to_boolean)"
> +}
> +-doc_end
> +
> -doc_begin="Violations caused by container_of are due to pointer arithmetic
> operations
> with the provided offset. The resulting pointer is then immediately cast
> back to its
> original type, which preserves the qualifier. This use is deemed safe.
> @@ -354,9 +418,18 @@ activity."
> -config=MC3R1.R14.2,reports+={disapplied,"any()"}
> -doc_end
>
> --doc_begin="The XEN team relies on the fact that invariant conditions of 'if'
> -statements are deliberate"
> --config=MC3R1.R14.3,statements={deliberate , "wrapped(any(),node(if_stmt))" }
> +-doc_begin="The XEN team relies on the fact that invariant conditions of
> 'if' statements and conditional operators are deliberate"
> +-config=MC3R1.R14.3,statements+={deliberate,
> "wrapped(any(),node(if_stmt||conditional_operator||binary_conditional_operator))"
> }
> +-doc_end
> +
> +-doc_begin="Switches having a 'sizeof' operator as the condition are
> deliberate and have limited scope."
> +-config=MC3R1.R14.3,statements+={deliberate,
> "wrapped(any(),node(switch_stmt)&&child(cond, operator(sizeof)))" }
> +-doc_end
> +
> +-doc_begin="The use of an invariant size argument in {put,get}_unsafe_size
> and array_access_ok, as defined in arch/x86(_64)?/include/asm/uaccess.h is
> deliberate and is deemed safe."
> +-file_tag+={x86_uaccess, "^xen/arch/x86(_64)?/include/asm/uaccess\\.h$"}
> +-config=MC3R1.R14.3,reports+={deliberate,
> "any_area(any_loc(file(x86_uaccess)&&any_exp(macro(^(put|get)_unsafe_size$))))"}
> +-config=MC3R1.R14.3,reports+={deliberate,
> "any_area(any_loc(file(x86_uaccess)&&any_exp(macro(^array_access_ok$))))"}
> -doc_end
>
> -doc_begin="A controlling expression of 'if' and iteration statements having
> integer, character or pointer type has a semantics that is well-known to all
> Xen developers."
> @@ -527,8 +600,8 @@ falls under the jurisdiction of other MISRA rules."
> # General
> #
>
> --doc_begin="do-while-0 is a well recognized loop idiom by the xen community."
> --loop_idioms={do_stmt, "literal(0)"}
> +-doc_begin="do-while-[01] is a well recognized loop idiom by the xen
> community."
> +-loop_idioms={do_stmt, "literal(0)||literal(1)"}
> -doc_end
> -doc_begin="while-[01] is a well recognized loop idiom by the xen community."
> -loop_idioms+={while_stmt, "literal(0)||literal(1)"}
> diff --git a/docs/misra/deviations.rst b/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> index 16fc345756..d682616796 100644
> --- a/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> +++ b/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules:
> switch statement.
> - ECLAIR has been configured to ignore those statements.
>
> + * - R2.1
> + - The asm-offset files are not linked deliberately, since they are used
> to
> + generate definitions for asm modules.
> + - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR.
> +
> * - R2.2
> - Proving compliance with respect to Rule 2.2 is generally impossible:
> see `<https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13933>`_ for details. Moreover, peer
> @@ -203,6 +208,26 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules:
> it.
> - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
>
> + * - R8.4
> + - Some functions are excluded from non-debug build, therefore the
> absence
> + of declaration is safe.
> + - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR, such functions are:
> + - apei_read_mce()
> + - apei_check_mce()
> + - apei_clear_mce()
> +
> + * - R8.4
> + - Given that bsearch and sort are defined with the attribute
> 'gnu_inline',
> + it's deliberate not to have a prior declaration.
> + See Section \"6.33.1 Common Function Attributes\" of \"GCC_MANUAL\"
> for
> + a full explanation of gnu_inline.
> + - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR.
> +
> + * - R8.4
> + - first_valid_mfn is defined in this way because the current lack of
> NUMA
> + support in Arm and PPC requires it.
> + - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR.
> +
> * - R8.6
> - The following variables are compiled in multiple translation units
> belonging to different executables and therefore are safe.
> @@ -282,6 +307,39 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules:
> If no bits are set, 0 is returned.
> - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
>
> + * - R11.1
> + - The conversion from a function pointer to unsigned long or (void \*)
> does
> + not lose any information, provided that the target type has enough
> bits
> + to store it.
> + - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
> +
> + * - R11.1
> + - The conversion from a function pointer to a boolean has a well-known
> + semantics that do not lead to unexpected behaviour.
> + - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
> +
> + * - R11.2
> + - The conversion from a pointer to an incomplete type to unsigned long
> + does not lose any information, provided that the target type has
> enough
> + bits to store it.
> + - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
> +
> + * - R11.3
> + - Conversions to object pointers that have a pointee type with a smaller
> + (i.e., less strict) alignment requirement are safe.
> + - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
> +
> + * - R11.6
> + - Conversions from and to integral types are safe, in the assumption
> that
> + the target type has enough bits to store the value.
> + See also Section \"4.7 Arrays and Pointers\" of \"GCC_MANUAL\"
> + - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
> +
> + * - R11.6
> + - The conversion from a pointer to a boolean has a well-known semantics
> + that do not lead to unexpected behaviour.
> + - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
> +
> * - R11.8
> - Violations caused by container_of are due to pointer arithmetic
> operations
> with the provided offset. The resulting pointer is then immediately
> cast back to its
> @@ -308,8 +366,19 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules:
>
> * - R14.3
> - The Xen team relies on the fact that invariant conditions of 'if'
> - statements are deliberate.
> - - Project-wide deviation; tagged as `disapplied` for ECLAIR.
> + statements and conditional operators are deliberate.
> + - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR.
> +
> + * - R14.3
> + - Switches having a 'sizeof' operator as the condition are deliberate
> and
> + have limited scope.
> + - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR.
> +
> + * - R14.3
> + - The use of an invariant size argument in {put,get}_unsafe_size and
> + array_access_ok, as defined in arch/x86(_64)?/include/asm/uaccess.h is
> + deliberate and is deemed safe.
> + - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR.
>
> * - R14.4
> - A controlling expression of 'if' and iteration statements having
> @@ -475,10 +544,10 @@ Other deviations:
> * - Deviation
> - Justification
>
> - * - do-while-0 loops
> - - The do-while-0 is a well-recognized loop idiom used by the Xen
> community
> - and can therefore be used, even though it would cause a number of
> - violations in some instances.
> + * - do-while-0 and do-while-1 loops
> + - The do-while-0 and do-while-1 loops are well-recognized loop idioms
> used
> + by the Xen community and can therefore be used, even though they would
> + cause a number of violations in some instances.
>
> * - while-0 and while-1 loops
> - while-0 and while-1 are well-recognized loop idioms used by the Xen
> --
> 2.34.1
>
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |