[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 09/12] sd: convert to the atomic queue limits API
On 29/05/2024 06:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Assign all queue limits through a local queue_limits variable and queue_limits_commit_update so that we can't race updating them from multiple places, and free the queue when updating them so that in-progress I/O submissions don't see half-updated limits. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/sd.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/scsi/sd.h | 6 +- drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c | 15 ++--- 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c index 2d08b69154b995..03e67936b27928 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c @@ -101,12 +101,13 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_SCSI_DEVICE(TYPE_ZBC);#define SD_MINORS 16 -static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *, unsigned int);-static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *); +static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct queue_limits *lim, + unsigned int mode); Are there any reasons why we keep forward declarations like this? AFAICS, this sd_config_discard forward declaration could be removed. +static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, + struct queue_limits *lim); static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *); static void sd_unlock_native_capacity(struct gendisk *disk); static void sd_shutdown(struct device *); -static void sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer); static void scsi_disk_release(struct device *cdev);static DEFINE_IDA(sd_index_ida);@@ -456,7 +457,8 @@ provisioning_mode_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct scsi_disk *sdkp = to_scsi_disk(dev); struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device; - int mode; + struct queue_limits lim; + int mode, err;if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))return -EACCES; @@ -472,8 +474,13 @@ provisioning_mode_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, if (mode < 0) return -EINVAL;- sd_config_discard(sdkp, mode);- + lim = queue_limits_start_update(sdkp->disk->queue); + sd_config_discard(sdkp, &lim, mode); + blk_mq_freeze_queue(sdkp->disk->queue); + err = queue_limits_commit_update(sdkp->disk->queue, &lim); + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(sdkp->disk->queue); + if (err) + return err; return count; } static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(provisioning_mode); @@ -556,6 +563,7 @@ max_write_same_blocks_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct scsi_disk *sdkp = to_scsi_disk(dev); struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device; + struct queue_limits lim; unsigned long max; int err;@@ -577,8 +585,13 @@ max_write_same_blocks_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,sdkp->max_ws_blocks = max; }- sd_config_write_same(sdkp);- + lim = queue_limits_start_update(sdkp->disk->queue); + sd_config_write_same(sdkp, &lim); + blk_mq_freeze_queue(sdkp->disk->queue); + err = queue_limits_commit_update(sdkp->disk->queue, &lim); + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(sdkp->disk->queue); + if (err) + return err; return count; } static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(max_write_same_blocks); @@ -827,17 +840,15 @@ static void sd_disable_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp) blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(sdkp->disk->queue, 0); }-static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned int mode)+static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct queue_limits *lim, + unsigned int mode) { - struct request_queue *q = sdkp->disk->queue; unsigned int logical_block_size = sdkp->device->sector_size; unsigned int max_blocks = 0;- q->limits.discard_alignment =- sdkp->unmap_alignment * logical_block_size; - q->limits.discard_granularity = - max(sdkp->physical_block_size, - sdkp->unmap_granularity * logical_block_size); + lim->discard_alignment = sdkp->unmap_alignment * logical_block_size; + lim->discard_granularity = max(sdkp->physical_block_size, + sdkp->unmap_granularity * logical_block_size); sdkp->provisioning_mode = mode;switch (mode) {@@ -875,7 +886,8 @@ static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned int mode) break; }- blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, max_blocks * (logical_block_size >> 9));+ lim->max_hw_discard_sectors = max_blocks * + (logical_block_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT); }static void *sd_set_special_bvec(struct request *rq, unsigned int data_len)@@ -1010,9 +1022,9 @@ static void sd_disable_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp) blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(sdkp->disk->queue, 0); }-static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)+static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, + struct queue_limits *lim) { - struct request_queue *q = sdkp->disk->queue; unsigned int logical_block_size = sdkp->device->sector_size;if (sdkp->device->no_write_same) {@@ -1066,8 +1078,8 @@ static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp) }out:- blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, sdkp->max_ws_blocks * - (logical_block_size >> 9)); + lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = + sdkp->max_ws_blocks * (logical_block_size >> 9); Would it be ok to use SECTOR_SHIFT here? A similar change is made in sd_config_discard(), above }static blk_status_t sd_setup_flush_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)@@ -2523,7 +2535,7 @@ static void read_capacity_error(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp, #define READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET 10static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,- unsigned char *buffer) + struct queue_limits *lim, unsigned char *buffer) { unsigned char cmd[16]; struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr; @@ -2597,7 +2609,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,/* Lowest aligned logical block */alignment = ((buffer[14] & 0x3f) << 8 | buffer[15]) * sector_size; - blk_queue_alignment_offset(sdp->request_queue, alignment); + lim->alignment_offset = alignment; if (alignment && sdkp->first_scan) sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "physical block alignment offset: %u\n", alignment); @@ -2608,7 +2620,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp, if (buffer[14] & 0x40) /* LBPRZ */ sdkp->lbprz = 1;- sd_config_discard(sdkp, SD_LBP_WS16);+ sd_config_discard(sdkp, lim, SD_LBP_WS16); }sdkp->capacity = lba + 1;@@ -2711,13 +2723,14 @@ static int sd_try_rc16_first(struct scsi_device *sdp) * read disk capacity */ static void -sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer) +sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct queue_limits *lim, + unsigned char *buffer) { int sector_size; struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;if (sd_try_rc16_first(sdp)) {- sector_size = read_capacity_16(sdkp, sdp, buffer); + sector_size = read_capacity_16(sdkp, sdp, lim, buffer); if (sector_size == -EOVERFLOW) goto got_data; if (sector_size == -ENODEV) @@ -2737,7 +2750,7 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer) int old_sector_size = sector_size; sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Very big device. " "Trying to use READ CAPACITY(16).\n"); - sector_size = read_capacity_16(sdkp, sdp, buffer); + sector_size = read_capacity_16(sdkp, sdp, lim, buffer); if (sector_size < 0) { sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Using 0xffffffff as device size\n"); @@ -2796,9 +2809,8 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer) */ sector_size = 512; } - blk_queue_logical_block_size(sdp->request_queue, sector_size); - blk_queue_physical_block_size(sdp->request_queue, - sdkp->physical_block_size); + lim->logical_block_size = sector_size; + lim->physical_block_size = sdkp->physical_block_size; sdkp->device->sector_size = sector_size;if (sdkp->capacity > 0xffffffff)@@ -3220,11 +3232,11 @@ static unsigned int sd_discard_mode(struct scsi_disk *sdkp) return SD_LBP_DISABLE; }-/**- * sd_read_block_limits - Query disk device for preferred I/O sizes. - * @sdkp: disk to query +/* + * Query disk device for preferred I/O sizes. */ -static void sd_read_block_limits(struct scsi_disk *sdkp) +static void sd_read_block_limits(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, + struct queue_limits *lim) { struct scsi_vpd *vpd;@@ -3258,7 +3270,7 @@ static void sd_read_block_limits(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)sdkp->unmap_alignment = get_unaligned_be32(&vpd->data[32]) & ~(1 << 31);- sd_config_discard(sdkp, sd_discard_mode(sdkp));+ sd_config_discard(sdkp, lim, sd_discard_mode(sdkp)); }out:@@ -3278,10 +3290,10 @@ static void sd_read_block_limits_ext(struct scsi_disk *sdkp) }/** below is not a kernel doc comment - * sd_read_block_characteristics - Query block dev. characteristics - * @sdkp: disk to query + * Query block dev. characteristics */ -static void sd_read_block_characteristics(struct scsi_disk *sdkp) +static void sd_read_block_characteristics(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, + struct queue_limits *lim) { struct request_queue *q = sdkp->disk->queue; struct scsi_vpd *vpd; @@ -3307,29 +3319,26 @@ static void sd_read_block_characteristics(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED /* sd_probe rejects ZBD devices early otherwise */if (sdkp->device->type == TYPE_ZBC) { - /* - * Host-managed. - */ - disk_set_zoned(sdkp->disk); + lim->zoned = true;/** Per ZBC and ZAC specifications, writes in sequential write * required zones of host-managed devices must be aligned to * the device physical block size. */ - blk_queue_zone_write_granularity(q, sdkp->physical_block_size); + lim->zone_write_granularity = sdkp->physical_block_size; } else { /* * Host-aware devices are treated as conventional. */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(blk_queue_is_zoned(q)); + lim->zoned = false; } #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED */if (!sdkp->first_scan)return;- if (blk_queue_is_zoned(q))+ if (lim->zoned) sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Host-managed zoned block device\n"); else if (sdkp->zoned == 1) sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Host-aware SMR disk used as regular disk\n"); @@ -3605,8 +3614,10 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk) struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device; struct request_queue *q = sdkp->disk->queue; sector_t old_capacity = sdkp->capacity; + struct queue_limits lim; unsigned char *buffer; unsigned int dev_max; + int err;SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(3, sd_printk(KERN_INFO, sdkp,"sd_revalidate_disk\n")); @@ -3627,12 +3638,14 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)sd_spinup_disk(sdkp); + lim = queue_limits_start_update(sdkp->disk->queue);+ /* * Without media there is no reason to ask; moreover, some devices * react badly if we do. */ if (sdkp->media_present) { - sd_read_capacity(sdkp, buffer); + sd_read_capacity(sdkp, &lim, buffer); /* * Some USB/UAS devices return generic values for mode pages * until the media has been accessed. Trigger a READ operation @@ -3651,10 +3664,10 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)if (scsi_device_supports_vpd(sdp)) {sd_read_block_provisioning(sdkp); - sd_read_block_limits(sdkp); + sd_read_block_limits(sdkp, &lim); sd_read_block_limits_ext(sdkp); - sd_read_block_characteristics(sdkp); - sd_zbc_read_zones(sdkp, buffer); + sd_read_block_characteristics(sdkp, &lim); + sd_zbc_read_zones(sdkp, &lim, buffer); sd_read_cpr(sdkp); }@@ -3683,28 +3696,33 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)q->limits.max_dev_sectors = logical_to_sectors(sdp, dev_max); is setting q->limits.max_dev_sectors directly proper? if (sd_validate_min_xfer_size(sdkp))- blk_queue_io_min(sdkp->disk->queue, - logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->min_xfer_blocks)); + lim.io_min = logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->min_xfer_blocks); else - blk_queue_io_min(sdkp->disk->queue, 0); + lim.io_min = 0;/** Limit default to SCSI host optimal sector limit if set. There may be * an impact on performance for when the size of a request exceeds this * host limit. */ - q->limits.io_opt = sdp->host->opt_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT; + lim.io_opt = sdp->host->opt_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT; if (sd_validate_opt_xfer_size(sdkp, dev_max)) { - q->limits.io_opt = min_not_zero(q->limits.io_opt, + lim.io_opt = min_not_zero(lim.io_opt, logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks)); }sdkp->first_scan = 0; set_capacity_and_notify(disk, logical_to_sectors(sdp, sdkp->capacity));- sd_config_write_same(sdkp); + sd_config_write_same(sdkp, &lim); kfree(buffer);
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |